[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guy Tann: Data Vendors



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Guy,

1999-1969 =30 years.  Hm-m-m-m.  Wish my memory was that good.
Calls to mind when the great grandson showed the new born to the 92 year
old great grandfather.  The gandfathers response was, "As best I can
recollect, it's a girl."

Please!!  No flames.  Anticipating a slow weekend, and still bleeding from
Friday's action in MER and SLB.

Al Taglavore

----------
> From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> Date: Friday, March 19, 1999 9:45 PM
> 
> Bob
> 
> OK, I understand that it's only $29 more.  My question is, what do I get
for
> the $29?  It's a little hard to sell me something if I can't see it,
touch
> it, feel it, oops, sorry, thinking about something else...  Those 60s
> flashbacks are truly realistic.  <G>
> 
> Guy
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bob Jagow
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 12:10 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> 
> 
> No free page, but print subscribers pay only $29/yr for the bundle --
> Barron's, Smart Money, and WSJ.
> 
> bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy Tann
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 1999 10:55 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
> Tried to look at it but it's subscription only.  I'll try to see if they
> have a free page somewhere.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Guy
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bob Jagow
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 1999 9:47 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> 
> 
> The Online MarketLab now has most everything, Guy.
> 
> http://interactive.wsj.com/documents/mlab-dj_half_hour.htm
> 
> Bob
> 
> bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy Tann
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 11:19 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> 
> 
> Al
> 
> Per my other post (which I haven't seen posted here yet, BTW) check out
page
> C3 of the Money & Investing Section of the Wall Street Journal.  In the
> table (The Dow Jones Averages Hour by Hour) they post both the
theoretical
> and the actual.  The open and the close remain the same in both cases. 
We
> hand post the actual from this table in our own data base.  I'm not sure
if
> anybody might provide it.  I think Prophet might have it, but since I
> couldn't get it to work, I really don't remember.
> 
> Guy
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 1:36 PM
> To: MetaStock List Group
> Subject: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> 
> 
> Guy, HOLD EVERYTHING!!  I recently made a post on Primate as a
satisfactory
> data vendor.  Please read a response to an inquiry I made today.  I ask
> this LIST, am I missing something?  My broker demands real money.  Gosh,
I
> wish my losss were "theoretical".
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Taglavore <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Primate Software <support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 10:01 AM
> Subject: Data Errors
> 
> >According to the data I have downloaded from QuoteMonkey, the DJIA
crossed
> >10,000 on 3/12, 3/15, and 3/16.  Did I miss something?  With the world
> >looking for Dow 10,000, I would have thought that your office would have
> >caught this immediately.  I have previously asked about
> >discrepancies/omissions and have received no reply.  What is the correct
> >procedure to get flawed data corrected?  How/When do you verify and
> correct
> >the data you have sent?  A prompt reply would be very much appreciated.
> >
> >Al Taglavore
> PRIMATE RESPONSE:
> 
> Al,  I thought I explained this before?  If not, you are looking at
> theoretical data for the highs and lows NOT actual.  If you look at
> Investors Daily they also use theoretical.  What it is- if all 30 Dow
> stocks
> trade at their highs or lows you would get these numbers.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>