[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Was thinking of Metastock but now not so sure


  • To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Was thinking of Metastock but now not so sure
  • From: Alain JOSSART <Alain.Jossart@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 01:12:00 -0500 (EST)
  • In-reply-to: <003d01be5c86$27027c80$5f1c4118@xxxxxxxx-a.gvsa1.bc.wave.ho me.com>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


+ Does Metastock Pro ($1500) compare to TradeStation 2000i or TradeStation
2000i + RadarScreen 2000i (a total of $4800) ?

I found both companies already failed to provide a downloadable document
providing complete technical specifications.

Alain
______________________________________
At 21:16 20/02/99 +1000, George Ashton wrote:
>You forgot the dongle!
>
>George.
>
>At 20:02 19/02/99 -0800, you wrote:
>>RS:
>>
>>I have not looked at Omega's TradeStation 2000i in depth, but I do monitor
>>their listserver.  I don't want to sound like a testimonial for MetaStock,
>>but the bitterness expressed on the Omega listserver relating to upgrades,
>>pricing, technical support and the complexity of Omega EasyLanguage leaves
>>me with a healthy respect for MetaStock and the techs at Equis [is my free
>>Equis T-Shirt in the mail, yet, guys? :) ].
>>
>>I guess the more you ask of a technical analysis package, the bigger it
>>bloats and the more complex and buggy it gets.
>>
>>Subscribe to both listservers and get a feel for it before deciding on a
>>package.
>>
>>
>>>>SNIP<<
>>>OK  I  decided to watch for a few weeks before jumping in.
>>>Now, i think i will not.     I dont know why anyone would accept
>>installing
>>>your own patches and all this  file management and screen saving... and
>>>not being able to write formulas the way you might want to with a
>>programming
>>>language or some  "Easier" language.
>>>
>>>Has anyone thoroughly checked out  Tradestation2000 ?  I did read the
>>>older T/S book with examples and the language looks  EASY-er to me.
>>>RS
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>