PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have tried to patch my version of MS 6.5. But the patching process stops
with me at about 37%. The version of MS is then still 6.5 and not 6.52.
The helpdesk said that my version of MS is not complete and that I should
try downloading the patch again. After several downloads the oatch still
satops at 37%>
Also a fresh installation of MS 6.5 from the CD gives the same stop of the
patch at 37%.
Anybody knows this problem and how to overcome it. Equis asks to wait for
the the new CD and then buy the new CD with a complete compiled version
6.52.
Bote-schijf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Hefner <VonHef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, February 18, 1999 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Missing File
>Hello Guy,
> Not sure this will fix your problem, but I had a similar warning ........
>the fix for
>my problem was to do a FULL reinstall from the 6.5 CD; my previous install
>from the CD did not include all of the "Multimedia" stuff. If memory
serves
>me,
>the file in question didn't have anything to do with "multimedia".
>
> Best wishes,
> Adam Hefner.
>VonHef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>---------------------------------------
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Thursday, February 18, 1999 1:57 AM
>Subject: Missing File
>
>
>>All:
>>
>>Well, I finally broke down and installed the latest and greatest updates.
>I
>>downloaded the newest 6.52 upgrade as well as the patch 6.52r. Never got
>>the message about completion that some people talk about. I hope that the
>>reason was that it was a window flashed upon the screen that went away by
>>itself.
>>
>>Anyway, both procedures appeared to run to completion. When I brought up
>>DL, it had the 2/8/99 build date and I hope this is correct.
>>
>>Trying to bring up MS, I get a bunch of error messages concerning the
>>MS65SNTX.DTA file not being current. OK everybody. What do I do now? I
>>went out to the Equis site and did a search for it and got nothing in
>>return. My file is dated 9/16/97. I assume the message indicates there
is
>>a newer version. Any suggestions as to where to find it or could some
kind
>>soul e-mail it to me?
>>
>>Maybe this is one of the reasons that I have had problems with MS using
>OLE.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Guy
>>
>
>
>
>
|