|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jim
That's what Viagra's for. The first thing that goes. <ggg>
Now if I could only remember where I put it <G>.
I'll post my support lines as soon as I've got them drawn. My S&P Cont.
data doesn't appear correct, IMHO, so I'm going back to CompuServe to
download them and see how they look.
Regards
Guy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 1998 5:27 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
>
>
> Guy,
> Let's hope both theories work and we both make some money. By
> the way, they say memory is the second thing that goes. I can't
> remember what the first was <G>.
>
> Jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, September 18, 1998 7:23 PM
> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
>
>
> >Jim
> >
> >My channel is so wide, both our theories can probably fit, as well as
> the
> >Titanic. With a range of almost 150 S&P points, we're talking about
> a 1350
> >point range for the DJIA.
> >
> >Since I lost all of my old graphs by changing data providers, and
> can't seem
> >to access my old ones, even by making a copy of the data, I'll have
> to play
> >with putting in my support lines again. Wish I could remember what I
> did
> ><G>.
> >
> >Guy
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> >> Sent: Friday, September 18, 1998 2:05 PM
> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
> >>
> >>
> >> Guy,
> >> I sure agree on those idiots in Washington. I'm going to look
> at
> >> my charts tonight, but believe that the horizontal trading channel
> >> theory is still good. The bottom of the channel is well defined,
> but
> >> the top is floating a little <G>.
> >>
> >> Jim
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Friday, September 18, 1998 2:40 AM
> >> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
> >>
> >>
> >> >Jim
> >> >
> >> >I sent you a Greenspan comment a while ago about my not believing
> >> that he
> >> >would ever do anything in time to do the market any good <G>.
> >> >
> >> >Now if we could only get those idiots in Washington to develop a
> >> laisez
> >> >faire attitude, we'd all be better off <ggg>.
> >> >
> >> >My bottom support in the channel this week is about 909, FWIW.
> >> According to
> >> >my chart, we've got a pretty big channel to move around in. From
> 909
> >> to
> >> >1065. I'd say there's enough room here to trade and do some
> damage.
> >> >
> >> >What we have noticed is that with the increased volatility, we've
> had
> >> to
> >> >expand our visual stops. For instance, we hit our visual stop
> >> yesterday,
> >> >but since we were near the top of the channel, we moved our visual
> >> stop to
> >> >just above the trend line and decided to wait it out.
> Unfortunately,
> >> I was
> >> >poised to buy a bunch of OEX OTM Puts this morning, expecting EOD
> >> rally to
> >> >carry through into the AM. Gang aft aglay, (sp?) as they say.
> >> >
> >> >The Globex S&P for Dec. is down another 1.50 or so. Meaningless,
> I
> >> know,
> >> >but today the actual market followed the Globex going into the
> open.
> >> The
> >> >DJIA was down approx. 212 before the open. I guess it opened up
> down
> >> almost
> >> >200.
> >> >
> >> >I lost my old expert charts and got a method from Equis support
> today
> >> to try
> >> >to recapture them. Let's see what happens, as my long term trend
> >> lines
> >> >aren't on this new, temp chart.
> >> >
> >> >Regards
> >> >
> >> >Guy
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 3:25 PM
> >> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Guy,
> >> >> After today I'm impressed! How did you talk Greenspan into
> >> jaw
> >> >> boning the market for you <G>. The question now is which witch
> >> will
> >> >> we get tomorrow?
> >> >>
> >> >> Jim
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 6:58 PM
> >> >> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >Jim
> >> >> >
> >> >> >What scares me is the fact that all the press is getting
> bearish,
> >> >> like
> >> >> >Barons, et al. What are the odds of these guys being right?
> Now
> >> I'm
> >> >> >starting to worry.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Guy
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim
> Greening
> >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 2:36 PM
> >> >> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Guy,
> >> >> >> I get 1057 for the top of the S&P Short Term Down Trend
> >> >> Channel
> >> >> >> (that's close enough <G>), but really question if it will
> hold
> >> >> >> considering that we are bouncing off the bottom of a much
> longer
> >> >> term
> >> >> >> up trend channel. I We should know soon.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Jim
> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 12:08 AM
> >> >> >> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Jim
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I was just so excited to get a signal, any signal <G>.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Haven't downloaded my numbers yet. Trying a new service
> >> (Prophet)
> >> >> on
> >> >> >> their
> >> >> >> >31 day free trial. First day, only got about half my
> futures.
> >> >> Some
> >> >> >> of the
> >> >> >> >symbols changed. Went back and corrected them and then
> tried
> >> >> again.
> >> >> >> Still
> >> >> >> >didn't download.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Guess I'll contact tech support.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >The top of my trendline was 1054 for the S&P. Maybe it went
> >> >> through
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >number. Will check after the download.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Guy
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim
> >> Greening
> >> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 3:05 PM
> >> >> >> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Guy,
> >> >> >> >> Good luck on your short. I just got through looking
> at
> >> the
> >> >> >> DJIA
> >> >> >> >> and don't believe it's going to turn here. It now looks
> to
> >> me
> >> >> like
> >> >> >> >> the congestion in the 8500-8600 range could be the top of
> the
> >> >> >> trading
> >> >> >> >> channel. Of course I've been wrong before and
> will.....<G>.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Jim
> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >> >> To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >> >> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 12:26 AM
> >> >> >> >> Subject: Finally a Signal!
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >Jim, Steve, et al
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Well, we finally have a confirmation. Will be shorting
> >> either
> >> >> >> >> tonight or
> >> >> >> >> >market on the open, depending upon how I feel <G>.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >We've been out of the market so long, I probably forgot
> how.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >After looking at my chart, our potential high on this
> move
> >> up
> >> >> is
> >> >> >> 1053
> >> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> >> >the S&P futures (still Sep in the Continuous data feed).
> It
> >> >> hit
> >> >> >> >> 1041.5
> >> >> >> >> >today on its high. Pretty close. Maybe we'll get a
> bounce
> >> on
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> open.
> >> >> >> >> >Anyway, we're short, or will soon be. Remember, 1 chance
> in
> >> 4
> >> >> of
> >> >> >> >> being
> >> >> >> >> >wrong <g>.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Regards
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Guy
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
|