|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>
Thanks for the info. If QP2 doesn't get straightened out, I may be looking
again. How easy is it to get your data converted to MS format to use with
MS?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Bill G Bolumen <<A
href="mailto:BOLUMENB@xxxxxxxxxxx";>BOLUMENB@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Thursday, September 17, 1998 8:34 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Quotes Plus
Download Problems<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Jim,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>I just subscribed to
TC2000 vs 4.1 and I like it. They are giving a free 30 day trial which
I am in. Have been using TC2000 for some time now but this new version
seems the best so far. I have not tried Quotes Plus which I understand
is quite a bit cheaper but TC2000 is now $29/month flat and you can get even
better deals if you pay ahead for a year or so.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I have always received my data on time as opposed to
Quotes Plus which has a reputation for late data sometimes, however, the
TC2000 data has its problems too with correcting splits and distributions on
a timely manner. In fact, I believe I have several securities where
they still have not corrected splits from last year so it has its problems
too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Just wanted you to know to give you other
options.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bill</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original
Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Jim Greening <<A
href="mailto:JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Wednesday, September 16, 1998 6:10 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Quotes
Plus Download Problems<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Jim,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT
size=2> I gave up on downloading last
night. Just downloaded yesterday's data a little while ago.
Hope I don't have trouble with today's data.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original
Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Jim DeWilder <<A
href="mailto:jdewilder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>jdewilder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B><A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Tuesday, September 15, 1998 8:22 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Quotes
Plus Download Problems<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>Has anyone had problems
downloading from Quotes Plus tonight? It is 5:00 PM PDST and I
am repeatedly not
successful.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Sep 18 15:55:18 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 20306
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 18:25:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA12848
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 05:12:05 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA12844
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 05:12:00 -0600
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com ([207.68.143.160])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA09019
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 15:14:46 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from user - 153.37.102.154 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:05:47 -0700
Message-ID: <00b201bde349$3285f700$9a662599@xxxx>
From: "Jim Greening" <JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 17:05:00 -0400
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Guy,
I sure agree on those idiots in Washington. I'm going to look at
my charts tonight, but believe that the horizontal trading channel
theory is still good. The bottom of the channel is well defined, but
the top is floating a little <G>.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, September 18, 1998 2:40 AM
Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
>Jim
>
>I sent you a Greenspan comment a while ago about my not believing
that he
>would ever do anything in time to do the market any good <G>.
>
>Now if we could only get those idiots in Washington to develop a
laisez
>faire attitude, we'd all be better off <ggg>.
>
>My bottom support in the channel this week is about 909, FWIW.
According to
>my chart, we've got a pretty big channel to move around in. From 909
to
>1065. I'd say there's enough room here to trade and do some damage.
>
>What we have noticed is that with the increased volatility, we've had
to
>expand our visual stops. For instance, we hit our visual stop
yesterday,
>but since we were near the top of the channel, we moved our visual
stop to
>just above the trend line and decided to wait it out. Unfortunately,
I was
>poised to buy a bunch of OEX OTM Puts this morning, expecting EOD
rally to
>carry through into the AM. Gang aft aglay, (sp?) as they say.
>
>The Globex S&P for Dec. is down another 1.50 or so. Meaningless, I
know,
>but today the actual market followed the Globex going into the open.
The
>DJIA was down approx. 212 before the open. I guess it opened up down
almost
>200.
>
>I lost my old expert charts and got a method from Equis support today
to try
>to recapture them. Let's see what happens, as my long term trend
lines
>aren't on this new, temp chart.
>
>Regards
>
>Guy
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 3:25 PM
>> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
>>
>>
>> Guy,
>> After today I'm impressed! How did you talk Greenspan into
jaw
>> boning the market for you <G>. The question now is which witch
will
>> we get tomorrow?
>>
>> Jim
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 6:58 PM
>> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
>>
>>
>> >Jim
>> >
>> >What scares me is the fact that all the press is getting bearish,
>> like
>> >Barons, et al. What are the odds of these guys being right? Now
I'm
>> >starting to worry.
>> >
>> >Guy
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 2:36 PM
>> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Guy,
>> >> I get 1057 for the top of the S&P Short Term Down Trend
>> Channel
>> >> (that's close enough <G>), but really question if it will hold
>> >> considering that we are bouncing off the bottom of a much longer
>> term
>> >> up trend channel. I We should know soon.
>> >>
>> >> Jim
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 12:08 AM
>> >> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Jim
>> >> >
>> >> >I was just so excited to get a signal, any signal <G>.
>> >> >
>> >> >Haven't downloaded my numbers yet. Trying a new service
(Prophet)
>> on
>> >> their
>> >> >31 day free trial. First day, only got about half my futures.
>> Some
>> >> of the
>> >> >symbols changed. Went back and corrected them and then tried
>> again.
>> >> Still
>> >> >didn't download.
>> >> >
>> >> >Guess I'll contact tech support.
>> >> >
>> >> >The top of my trendline was 1054 for the S&P. Maybe it went
>> through
>> >> that
>> >> >number. Will check after the download.
>> >> >
>> >> >Guy
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim
Greening
>> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 3:05 PM
>> >> >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Guy,
>> >> >> Good luck on your short. I just got through looking at
the
>> >> DJIA
>> >> >> and don't believe it's going to turn here. It now looks to
me
>> like
>> >> >> the congestion in the 8500-8600 range could be the top of the
>> >> trading
>> >> >> channel. Of course I've been wrong before and will.....<G>.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jim
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 12:26 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Finally a Signal!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Jim, Steve, et al
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Well, we finally have a confirmation. Will be shorting
either
>> >> >> tonight or
>> >> >> >market on the open, depending upon how I feel <G>.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >We've been out of the market so long, I probably forgot how.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >After looking at my chart, our potential high on this move
up
>> is
>> >> 1053
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> >the S&P futures (still Sep in the Continuous data feed). It
>> hit
>> >> >> 1041.5
>> >> >> >today on its high. Pretty close. Maybe we'll get a bounce
on
>> the
>> >> >> open.
>> >> >> >Anyway, we're short, or will soon be. Remember, 1 chance in
4
>> of
>> >> >> being
>> >> >> >wrong <g>.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Regards
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Guy
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
|