|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jim,
Thank G-d there are individuals such as you.
Please count me in to the moderated list.
Also, maybe you'd want to set ujp some rules
of etiquette. For example, many responses from
list members is a forward to all incorporating the
original note. Responses to responses also does
the same. Consequently we end up with e-mail
that is growing geometrically. I suggest that all
try to be specific in the SUBJECT and respondents
just refer to the SUBJECT as specified. Or maybe
respondents should just add a REFERENCE line
indicating the sender and date of the original only.
Regards,
Stan Rubenstein
----------
> From: Jim Michael <genepool@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Wouldn't it be nice ...
> Date: Thursday, September 17, 1998 5:41 PM
>
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998 lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Count me in too. I'm deleting unread all emails on the soap opera.
>
> OK, since I have a server with Majordomo ready to go, I am willing to set
> up and maintain a moderated Metastock + Technical trading list. I have
> been on this list since the days it was getting maybe one post a month
> (most of the traffic was in the investment forum on CIS at the time, not
> the Internet) and think it is now time for a moderated list. I can
> understand reluctance on Equis' part in attempting to moderate the list
> due to the ill will that they think may be generated. I realize
> there are those who equate moderation with censorship and will not be
> interested, but that's OK. If you are interested please send me a
> *private* email saying you are interested in the new list. I will need a
> few days to set everything up and test. If someone has already begun work
> on a moderated list, please let me know so I don't waste the effort.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim
> --
|