|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Got to be something about wiping your chinski.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steve Karnish
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 10:49 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr (My first
> and last post to this thread)
>
>
> > > How about lying, but not under oath? Idaho Rep. Helen
> Chenoweth denied her
> > > affair when first confronted with it in 1995, a reporter
> for the Spokane
> > > Spokesman-Review says.
>
> I have absolutely no opinion about Clinton/Starr, with maybe the
> exception that they're both scumbag lawyers. But Helen
> Chenoweth, now you're talking my own back yard: Idaho. In this
> neck of the woods, where the most common bumper sticker is: "Can
> Helen, not salmon", we always knew she was a good for nothing,
> cheap slut. Oh boy, just think, years and years to come of
> examining every politician's natural and unnatural sexual
> histories. John Lennon said it best: "Everybody has something
> to hide, except me and my monkey".
>
> This list has been so much fun lately, I've been thinkin of
> sponsor a limerick contest. How about it? Here's the rule: You
> must use Lewinsky and Kaczynski in the same limerick. Starting
> tomorrow, I will post limericks until this thread stops. I
> don't care
> who's offended. Every post concerning Clinton/Starr
> offends me.
>
> So, get ready:
>
> Said Bill Clinton to young Ms. Lewinsky
> We don't want to leave clues like Kaczynski,
> Since you look such a mess,
> Use the hem of your dress
> (to be filled in tomorrow)
>
> Sleep tight,
>
> Steve Karnish
> CCT
>
> ----------
> > From: Mullin285@xxxxxxx
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr
> > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 8:57 PM
> >
> > Sheesh... No offense but I really hope that this thread
> doesn't evolve into a
> > discussion about regional politicians, I can barely stand it
> now. Fortunatly I
> > don't know enough about the Idaho reps love affairs or results
> to comment
> > directly about that. On who's furniture did she do her dirty
> deeds? Uhh never
> > mind, please don't answer.
> >
> > I'm sorry but this is really getting out of hand now. So it no
> longer matters
> > if you lie under oath? What the heck is an oath for then?
> Maybe we should
> > repeal the 'oath' law, that would really be 'convenient'.
> "Which is worse,
> > lying before a prosecutor, or lying before God' you ask. Hmmm
> tough one here.
> > Does that mean that God can't hear ya if you lie before a
> prosecutor? Hmmm If
> > that's true then I wonder if you have an affair with a
> prosecutor, does that
> > mean God can't see it. This may be a good solution for Willy,
> He should have
> > had all of his affairs with prosecutors then no one would
> know. Too late now.
> >
> > I can't believe it is still going on. More of Clinton's true
> colors are now
> > coming out. Kind of like, but officer they went through the
> red light too. If
> > he were a real man he would stand up and take responsibility
> for his deeds. Oh
> > yeah but I never inhaled. Sheesh. Reminds me of 3rd grade, but
> teacher he
> > started it... I'm waiting to hear Clinton's new defense 'But I
> had my fingers
> > crossed ...
> >
> > This world is getting to be a scary place. Oh if only AOL mail
> had kill files.
> > Anyone know of a way to kill threads coming through AOL?
> >
> > In a message dated 9/16/98 9:48:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > Brookemail@xxxxxxx writes:
> > > How about lying, but not under oath? Idaho Rep. Helen
> Chenoweth denied her
> > > affair when first confronted with it in 1995, a reporter
> for the Spokane
> > > Spokesman-Review says. Or is it just lying under oath that
> you're
> > > conveniently
> > > concerned about? Are the vows of marriage an oath? Is an
> affair in itself a
> > > lie, when your spouse doesn't know about it? Did Reps. Dan
> Burton and Henry
> > > Hyde in effect lie to their familes? Or are you concerned
> only about lying
> > > to
> > > prosecutors? Are you concerned about character? "This
> hypocrite broke up my
> > > family," says the former husband of a woman who reportedly
> had an affair
> > > with
> > > Hyde. Which is worse, lying before a prosecutor, or lying
> before God?
> > >
>
|