[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Lionel, I completely agree with you.  Couldn't have said it better myself.

Al


Al Stephens
astephen@xxxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lionel Issen
> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 1998 5:25 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; EMail List FastTrack; Al Angle; John
> Aupperle; Scott Brandau; Stan Ellison; Clem Gagne; Mike Hasket; Pamela
> E. Hinchey; Mike Hodges; Marketspace Financial; Don Potter; Andy Pracht;
> Gene Schwartz
> Cc: Al Angle; John Aupperle; Scott Brandau; Stan Ellison; Clem Gagne;
> Mike Hasket; Pamela E. Hinchey; Mike Hodges; Marketspace Financial; Don
> Potter; Andy Pracht; Gene Schwartz; Frank Tarr, OD
> Subject: Re: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr
>
>
> Bill:
>
> On the one hand you have a point or two.
>
> On the other hand the Republicans have no program, no policy, and no plans
> for dealing with our domestic, economic, military, and foreign policy
> problems.
>
> This "lets get Clinton for screwing around" is like Hitler
> blaming the Jews,
> Stalin blaming the capitalists, the KKK blaming Blacks, Jews, and
> Hispanics,
> the Ayatollah blaming the Americans.. need I go on.  Finding a scapegoat
> beats thinking and working to solve our problems each and every time.
>
> The investigation started with Whitewater, nothing was found.  So we did
> find that Clinton has his brains hanging out.  Incidentally one
> of our  most
> lecherous presidents was a republican, so what.
>
> This so-called investigation and report has made us the laughing stock of
> the world and has seriously weakened our influence and ability to
> influence
> events.  It will also weaken the ability and power of presidents in the
> future, no matter what party they belong to.
>
> Kenneth Starr has done his party and our country a great diservice.
>
> Lionel
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Saxon <bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: EMail List FastTrack <fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; EMail List Metastock
> <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Al Angle <jangle@xxxxxxxx>; John Aupperle
> <JAupp@xxxxxxx>; Scott Brandau <sbrandau@xxxxxxxx>; Stan Ellison
> <BSEllison@xxxxxxx>; Clem Gagne <clemray@xxxxxxx>; Mike Hasket
> <ellmic1@xxxxxxxx>; Pamela E. Hinchey <spamette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Mike Hodges
> <mwhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Marketspace Financial <marketspac@xxxxxxx>; Don
> Potter <djp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Pracht <pracht@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gene
> Schwartz <travel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Al Angle <jangle@xxxxxxxx>; John Aupperle <JAupp@xxxxxxx>;
> Scott Brandau
> <sbrandau@xxxxxxxx>; Stan Ellison <BSEllison@xxxxxxx>; Clem Gagne
> <clemray@xxxxxxx>; Mike Hasket <ellmic1@xxxxxxxx>; Pamela E. Hinchey
> <spamette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mike Hodges <mwhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Marketspace
> Financial <marketspac@xxxxxxx>; Don Potter
> <djp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy
> Pracht <pracht@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gene Schwartz
> <travel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Frank
> Tarr, OD <FTARR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, September 13, 1998 1:14 PM
> Subject: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr
>
>
> >My wife, who grabbed this best seller from my hands before I had a chance
> to
> >read it, made this observation.  I tend to agree with her.  Like
> most women
> she
> >is quite intuitive.  I do not think that Monica is the poor little intern
> >intimidated by a President who wielded his power and influence
> to have his
> way
> >with her.  To me (and my wife) she is an attractive young lady who by her
> own
> >account seduced a relatively old fool who used the wrong head to think
> with.
> >
> >I feel sorry for the man but I am not sure I want him as Commander in
> Chief.
> >Not because of the perjury but because of the lack of good sense.  The
> >interesting thing is that with all the mulling over by the press I have
> heard no
> >one put forth this observation.  When I carefully read the details of the
> >encounters this conclusion seems reasonable and likely.
> >Any opinions??
> >
> >
>