PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2> If
I ever stumble on to the secret I'll yell <G>. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Bill G Bolumen <<A
href="mailto:BOLUMENB@xxxxxxxxxxx">BOLUMENB@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Sunday, September 13, 1998 4:55 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Weekly
Pick<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Jim,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>I have to agree. I also
tried Candlesticks for about 6 months with both Telescan and Metastock and
was unsuccessful generating any reliable signals although some people swear
by it, I have yet to see it demonstrated consistently. Even as an
additional indicator, I completely stopped looking at it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Good luck this week.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bill</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original
Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Jim Greening <<A
href="mailto:JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Sunday, September 13, 1998 3:39 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Weekly
Pick<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Guy,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT
size=2> I have Nison's book on "Japanese
Candlestick Charting Techniques" and have tried to follow/use some
of the formations with no success what so ever. I even tried some
systems with candlestick formations, but didn't get good returns.
I'm convinced that there may be something to it and even use the
Candlestick charts, but so far it just hasn't soaked in
<G>.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original
Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>Guy Tann <<A
href="mailto:grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx">grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B><A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Sunday, September 13, 1998 12:57 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>RE:
Weekly Pick<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Jim</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Took a look at my DJIA weekly charts with the corresponding
BB (using their defaults) and by BB range runs from 9350 and 6600
with the current position being just below the mid point around
7900. I can be like the NBC talking heads and say we have an
equal chance of going up or going down.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>FWIW, we finally got a Sell Signal.....</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Now our 'Contrary' was a 36 and our maximum is 35 (based upon
probabilities). Now comes the basic question and the second
guessing of our system, do we wait, and follow the trading rules, or
do we say that's close enough and short the
market.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Hopefully our maturity will prevail and we will wait.
We need another up day, but not quite as
strong. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Wish I knew more about Candlesticks, but when I switched over
to that format, the pattern looks interesting. If I only knew
what it means <G>. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Regards</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Guy</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=230521316-13091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On Behalf Of</B> Jim
Greening<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, September 12, 1998 10:54
AM<BR><B>To:</B> Metastock<BR><B>Subject:</B> Weekly
Pick<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> The
market did move up yesterday and I did open my DELL position at
56 3/8. So far so good, now if it will just follow through
<G>. I took a long look at the indices last night
and they are acting right for my theory. To expand it a
little, I believe the DJIA is trying to set up a volatile
sideways or horizontal channel trading range between 7500 and
8000. The DJIA is not near the bottom of any of my trend
channels but both the OEX and SPX are bouncing off the bottom of
long term channels. There is , however, some support for
the DJIA near 7500 from the Jan lows and resistance above 8000
from last falls highs. Looking at the daily action, the
DJIA has tested the 7500 level three times in the last two weeks
so it does look like a bottoming action. With the
volatility we have seen, I fully expect another test of the 8000
level soon. However, this is still a somewhat tenuous
theory and a long way from reality. I will commit to
positions to play the theory, but want to do so more cautiously
then usual with very close stops. That means any stock I
pick must be close to the bottom of the channel since I set my
stops under the channel and preferable has just bounced up a
little. Also I'm only going to play the large market
leaders in groups I'm interested in. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> Even
with the large DELL position and my normal size RDC position,
I'm still over 50% cash and want at least one more position to
play the bounce I'm hoping for. I think the brokers and
financial service groups have been over punished and over sold
lately so that's the group for this weeks pick. I narrowed
my list to Schwab and Travelers Group (TRV) and decided on TRV
since it is so over sold and since Sandy Weill always bounces
back. I only wish I had ridden his coat tails more in the
past <G>. TRV is going to be the true financial
services giant when the merger with Citicorp is
completed.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> TRV at
40 7/8 broke out of a Short Term Down Trend Channel Friday on
good volume. It's also in a Long Term Up Trend Channel
(LTUTC) with the top at 80 3/8 and the bottom at 38. It
peaked at 73 3/8 on 4/6/98 and then went into a four month
CANSLIM cup type formation but failed to breakout in Jul and
then went into a tail spin to a low of 36.4375 Friday morning
before the good up move. Looking at the chart, the last
week shows a typical Equivolume reversal pattern with TRV
bouncing off the bottom of the LTUTC twice on high volume.
It closed at the lows on the first bounce, but closed at the
highs yesterday. The Support/Resistance and CMO indicators
look like the beginning of a reversal pattern. The
fundamentals are better than ever with the PE at 12.1,
price/sales at 1.1, return on equity at 17.5%, 5 yr. revenue
growth rate at 49% and 5 yr. earnings growth rate at 19%.
TRV just kept growing while the stock price dropped.
That's why I think it's so over sold and such a bargain right
here. I'll take a long position at Monday's open, set my
target just under the top of the LTUTC at 80 and my mental stop
just under it at 37 3/4. I'd like to hang on to this one
as a long term core position if it will let me so I'll wait
until a good short term up trend channel forms before moving my
stop up to it. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> I'm
sending a TRV.GIF chart to everyone on my email chart
list. If you're not on the list, and want on, just
yell.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000
size=2>Jim </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Sep 13 17:14:11 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 1768
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 19:59:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA22920
for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 16:41:28 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA22917
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 16:41:25 -0600
Received: from server.worldinfonet.com (mail.boydcorp.com [207.183.248.2])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA02733
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 16:52:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from johntaff ([209.214.52.28]) by server.worldinfonet.com
(Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-36476U2500L250S0)
with SMTP id AAA187 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Sun, 13 Sep 1998 15:39:18 -0700
Message-ID: <002401bddf68$78fde560$1c34d6d1@xxxxxxxx>
From: "Jim DeWilder" <jdewilder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PV Binary Wave System Test
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 15:47:17 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_01BDDF2D.C91375A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>Jim,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I can make the changes you outlined below
manually. However, if you could send me the files with the changes in
them, I would appreciate it. I would like to experiment a little
more.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Jim Greening <<A
href="mailto:JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Metastock <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Sunday, September 13, 1998 10:31 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>PV Binary Wave
System Test<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> I wanted everyone
to know that I hadn't forgotten the development of the Price Volume Binary
Wave. I've just been very busy and haven't had much time for it.
For one thing our first grandson (to go with our two granddaughters) was
born a couple of months ago. They live about an hours drive North of
us and needless to say, we have been making that short trip often
<G>. Anyway, back to business. I combined the first two
PVBW formulas into the following:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Sep 13 17:47:50 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 17699
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 20:44:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA23514
for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 17:33:29 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA23511
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 17:33:26 -0600
Received: from camel14.mindspring.com (camel14.mindspring.com [207.69.200.64])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02788
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 17:44:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from dell (pool-207-205-239-156.atln.grid.net [207.205.239.156])
by camel14.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA09243
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 19:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000b01bddf6f$2f3e0700$0100a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Richard Estes" <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 18:35:24 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
I wondered, who the polls were calling. Now I know. We shouldn't take up any
more space here. But I would note two things if Clinton and others lied in
whitewater, filegate, travelgate, and fundsgate like they did in Zippergate.
It would be very hard to bring forward, what anyone could see was crooked
actions on their part. The man has lied all his life, he has never uttered
the truth about anything, period.
Zippergate was turned over to Starr by AG Reno and a three judge panel. When
the judges in the phoney appeals cases by clinton saw the evidence, they
decided in Starr's favor.
No, Republicans have no plans to increase the socialist aspects of our
government. That is why I like them, I believe in capitalism.
Richard Estes
-----Original Message-----
From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; EMail List FastTrack
<fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Al Angle <jangle@xxxxxxxx>; John Aupperle
<JAupp@xxxxxxx>; Scott Brandau <sbrandau@xxxxxxxx>; Stan Ellison
<BSEllison@xxxxxxx>; Clem Gagne <clemray@xxxxxxx>; Mike Hasket
<ellmic1@xxxxxxxx>; Pamela E. Hinchey <spamette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mike Hodges
<mwhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Marketspace Financial <marketspac@xxxxxxx>; Don
Potter <djp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Pracht <pracht@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gene
Schwartz <travel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Angle <jangle@xxxxxxxx>; John Aupperle <JAupp@xxxxxxx>; Scott Brandau
<sbrandau@xxxxxxxx>; Stan Ellison <BSEllison@xxxxxxx>; Clem Gagne
<clemray@xxxxxxx>; Mike Hasket <ellmic1@xxxxxxxx>; Pamela E. Hinchey
<spamette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mike Hodges <mwhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Marketspace
Financial <marketspac@xxxxxxx>; Don Potter <djp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy
Pracht <pracht@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gene Schwartz <travel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Frank
Tarr, OD <FTARR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, September 13, 1998 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr
>Bill:
>
>On the one hand you have a point or two.
>
>On the other hand the Republicans have no program, no policy, and no plans
>for dealing with our domestic, economic, military, and foreign policy
>problems.
>
>This "lets get Clinton for screwing around" is like Hitler blaming the
Jews,
>Stalin blaming the capitalists, the KKK blaming Blacks, Jews, and
Hispanics,
>the Ayatollah blaming the Americans.. need I go on. Finding a scapegoat
>beats thinking and working to solve our problems each and every time.
>
>The investigation started with Whitewater, nothing was found. So we did
>find that Clinton has his brains hanging out. Incidentally one of our
most
>lecherous presidents was a republican, so what.
>
>This so-called investigation and report has made us the laughing stock of
>the world and has seriously weakened our influence and ability to influence
>events. It will also weaken the ability and power of presidents in the
>future, no matter what party they belong to.
>
>Kenneth Starr has done his party and our country a great diservice.
>
>Lionel
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Saxon <bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: EMail List FastTrack <fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; EMail List Metastock
><metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Al Angle <jangle@xxxxxxxx>; John Aupperle
><JAupp@xxxxxxx>; Scott Brandau <sbrandau@xxxxxxxx>; Stan Ellison
><BSEllison@xxxxxxx>; Clem Gagne <clemray@xxxxxxx>; Mike Hasket
><ellmic1@xxxxxxxx>; Pamela E. Hinchey <spamette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mike
Hodges
><mwhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Marketspace Financial <marketspac@xxxxxxx>; Don
>Potter <djp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Pracht <pracht@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gene
>Schwartz <travel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Al Angle <jangle@xxxxxxxx>; John Aupperle <JAupp@xxxxxxx>; Scott
Brandau
><sbrandau@xxxxxxxx>; Stan Ellison <BSEllison@xxxxxxx>; Clem Gagne
><clemray@xxxxxxx>; Mike Hasket <ellmic1@xxxxxxxx>; Pamela E. Hinchey
><spamette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mike Hodges <mwhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Marketspace
>Financial <marketspac@xxxxxxx>; Don Potter <djp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Andy
>Pracht <pracht@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gene Schwartz <travel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Frank
>Tarr, OD <FTARR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sunday, September 13, 1998 1:14 PM
>Subject: "The Seduction of a President" by Kenneth Starr
>
>
>>My wife, who grabbed this best seller from my hands before I had a chance
>to
>>read it, made this observation. I tend to agree with her. Like most
women
>she
>>is quite intuitive. I do not think that Monica is the poor little intern
>>intimidated by a President who wielded his power and influence to have his
>way
>>with her. To me (and my wife) she is an attractive young lady who by her
>own
>>account seduced a relatively old fool who used the wrong head to think
>with.
>>
>>I feel sorry for the man but I am not sure I want him as Commander in
>Chief.
>>Not because of the perjury but because of the lack of good sense. The
>>interesting thing is that with all the mulling over by the press I have
>heard no
>>one put forth this observation. When I carefully read the details of the
>>encounters this conclusion seems reasonable and likely.
>>Any opinions??
>>
>>
>
|