[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trend Line error in MSWIN 6.5!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Al,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I 
sent a copy to equis support.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From: 
    </B>Alton Stephens &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:astephen@xxxxxxxx";>astephen@xxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: </B><A 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date: 
    </B>Monday, September 07, 1998 6:54 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Trend Line error 
    in MSWIN 6.5!<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
    <DIV><SPAN class=950032822-07091998><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
    size=3>Jim, I hope Equis support sees your question- it is buried in your 
    post and is most easy to miss altogether unless one reads the post 
    carefully.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><BR>
    <P><FONT size=2>Al Stephens<BR>astephen@xxxxxxxx</FONT> </P>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
        <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman" 
        size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
        owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On Behalf Of</B> Jim 
        Greening<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, September 07, 1998 2:43 
        PM<BR><B>To:</B> Metastock<BR><B>Subject:</B> Weekly Pick &amp; 
        XCIT<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>All,</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Jim DeWilder 
        and I have been exchanging messages for the last two days trying to get 
        our XCIT charts to agree.&nbsp; His trend line was right at the bottom 
        of the data and hadn't been broken yet.&nbsp; We tried to duplicate 
        results and I even erased my file and reloaded data from Quotes Plus 2 
        to make sure we were working from the same data.&nbsp; I now think my 
        attached chart is right, which has a slightly lower trend&nbsp; line 
        than my original chart.&nbsp; The stock still broke the trend&nbsp; line 
        and pulled back above, but hasn't broken back through again.&nbsp; Since 
        the other facts I mentioned are still valid, I'm still going to open a 
        put position tomorrow, but only 1/2 the size that I originally 
        intended.&nbsp; If you are thinking about shorting the stock, you might 
        want to consider playing safe and waiting for it to trade below 
        24.</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We are still 
        trying to get our charts to agree exactly, but I wanted to get this 
        information out today.&nbsp; I did learn two things.&nbsp; First, you 
        have to be extremely careful when you are making a trend&nbsp; line from 
        two or three points that are fairly close together then extending it to 
        the right across a long time span.&nbsp; The second is more 
        disturbing.&nbsp; I made my long term trend line by zooming in on the 
        May96 to Aug 97 data range, changing the Y scale max to 10 and then drew 
        the trend line through the low points and extended it to the 
        right.&nbsp; I then hit the ZOOM reset and looked at the chart as I 
        gradually zoomed in to the right.&nbsp; The disturbing fact is that each 
        time I zoomed in, the trend line angle seemed to shift up or down a 
        little.&nbsp; That's very disturbing if the trend line position relative 
        to the stock data varies depending on how much you zoom in or 
        out.</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Equis Support 
        has anyone else complained about this.&nbsp; Do trend lines that the 
        user draw in really shift position when you zoom in and out?&nbsp; If 
        so, is the working solution to set your zoom so the beginning and ending 
        points of the trend line you want to act on are displayed?</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
        <DIV><FONT color=#000000 
size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Sep 07 18:45:27 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 3727
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon,  7 Sep 1998 21:33:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA01536
	for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 18:36:47 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA01533
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 18:36:42 -0600
Received: from mail.alphalink.com.au (mail02.alphalink.com.au [203.56.45.7])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA10241
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 18:47:20 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ian (ppp60-as0-Melbourne.alphalink.com.au [202.164.245.187]) by mail.alphalink.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA07562 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 10:38:58 +1000
Message-ID: <005a01bddac1$1360dba0$bbf5a4ca@xxx>
From: "Ian Mitchell" <ianm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "metastock post" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Win 98
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 10:27:23 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0518.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0518.4
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1

When Win98 installs, the software checks out all the hardware including the
motherboard and peripherals and builds an operating system based on this. If
you take the image from your Notebook and place in on your Desktop, I doubt
it will work at all, and definitely would not be optimally configured. I
recommend a clean Win98 install on the desktop.

I don't think you should be too worried about this. You will be surprised at
the amount of extra files and clutter you have accumulated, which will be
cleaned out, and the system should run better as a result. I for one do a
clean install about every 3 months, and consider the few hours required a
worthy investment in my computing resource.

Of course make sure you back up important data first. If you have Outlook
Express make sure you back up your e-mails. They are by default set up in
the c:\windows\application data\microsoft\outlook express directory. Also
backup your browser bookmarks. I place all valuable data onto another
partition (D: Drive) and Deltree c:\, rather than a re-format of c:

Cheers
Ian
(ianm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Saxon <bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: E-mail List FastTrack <fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; E-mail List Metastock
<metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, 8 September 1998 1:24 am
Subject: Win 98


>I am getting a new Notebook that comes with Win98.  I have heard so much to
do
>about doing Upgrades as opposed to wiping the disk clean and installing
from
>scratch.  Some say, including PC Magazine that cleaning the disk is better.
>Could I just use the pre installed Win98 on the Notebook, reinstall all my
>programs (Ugh) and then put a mirror image on my desktop after it is
configured
>like I want it?  Is that better than an upgrade on the desktop??   Thanks,
>Bill
>
>