[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Web sites for stock charts



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Thank You John, for pointing out Richards' thoughtless
thank-ridden missives.

And for protecting our precious natural resouses and
bodily fluids.

Signed,

Another Strong Metastock-lidite

-----Original Message-----
From: John Scudiero <scudiero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: Web sites for stock charts


>Richard your response is silly and in fact I wish I did not have to write
>this e-mail.  But why don't you get a real life.  I had high hopes when
>joining this stock group, since I am a strong user of metastock. Since
>joining I been getting over 50 e-mails a day.  More than half of them are
>simple stupid thank you's from idiots like yourself who have no respect for
>other peoples time or natural resources (yes we waste precision natural
>resouses).
>
>Get smart and just sent a personal thank you and not broatcast it over the
>net.  We don not want to see that stuff.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard Estes <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 2:04 AM
>Subject: Re: Web sites for stock charts
>
>
>>Do you hug trees, too?
>>
>>Every time I see the "web police", quitting petting their cats, long
enough
>>to jump on  someone, I know they need to get a life. I could care less.
>>Especially when their posts offer no substance. The Net is free, the exits
>>are marked.
>>
>>Richard Estes
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxx>
>>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lionel Issen
>><lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Date: Sunday, July 26, 1998 10:13 AM
>>Subject: Re: Web sites for stock charts
>>
>>
>>>>Are you aware you sent 4KB of data all over the planet just so you could
>>>>say 'thank you'?
>>>
>>>4KB x 15000 users being member of the List = 60000KB = 53MB.
>>>Not as bad as some list-members requesting to be put on another
>>List-members' mailing-list.
>>>Last week have received roughly 25 requests' copies(straight deleted to
>the
>>bin) =
>>>25 x 4KB x 15000 = 1500000KB = 1332MB = 1.18GB(estimated)
>>>
>>>But that is not important(or why else is the internet sometimes so
slow?).
>>>What is important is that the High Trafficed List can be reduced to mail
>>WITH content THAT is
>>>to then intrest of ALL, NOT ONLY to the single supposibly ADRESSED
MEMBER.
>>>The replies or requests are pretty natural, as a lot of work has to be
>done
>>to the earlier send
>>>mails generating these requests, work that is widely appriciated,
>>recoqnised and much welcomed.
>>>
>>>This OFCOURSE is NOT implementing that these answer-mails are
unimportant,
>>far from that
>>>actualy, as they are, in particular, to the adressed list-member.
>>>But to the exceptance that they are not important to ANY OTHER
>>List-members, as they cannot
>>>find ANY employment for them.
>>>
>>>Therefore please ask 'your' senders of these
>>"no-List-related-contents"-mails to send these
>>>directly to the applicable rightious List-members' private
email-adresses.
>>>This will then save, ALL of the other List-members, on unnessacery
>>load-receiving- and deleting
>>>handlings.
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance for the cooperation in this, the help is hereby given,
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Ton Maas
>>>Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>
>>
>