|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Richard your response is silly and in fact I wish I did not have to write
this e-mail. But why don't you get a real life. I had high hopes when
joining this stock group, since I am a strong user of metastock. Since
joining I been getting over 50 e-mails a day. More than half of them are
simple stupid thank you's from idiots like yourself who have no respect for
other peoples time or natural resources (yes we waste precision natural
resouses).
Get smart and just sent a personal thank you and not broatcast it over the
net. We don not want to see that stuff.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Estes <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: Web sites for stock charts
>Do you hug trees, too?
>
>Every time I see the "web police", quitting petting their cats, long enough
>to jump on someone, I know they need to get a life. I could care less.
>Especially when their posts offer no substance. The Net is free, the exits
>are marked.
>
>Richard Estes
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxx>
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lionel Issen
><lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Sunday, July 26, 1998 10:13 AM
>Subject: Re: Web sites for stock charts
>
>
>>>Are you aware you sent 4KB of data all over the planet just so you could
>>>say 'thank you'?
>>
>>4KB x 15000 users being member of the List = 60000KB = 53MB.
>>Not as bad as some list-members requesting to be put on another
>List-members' mailing-list.
>>Last week have received roughly 25 requests' copies(straight deleted to
the
>bin) =
>>25 x 4KB x 15000 = 1500000KB = 1332MB = 1.18GB(estimated)
>>
>>But that is not important(or why else is the internet sometimes so slow?).
>>What is important is that the High Trafficed List can be reduced to mail
>WITH content THAT is
>>to then intrest of ALL, NOT ONLY to the single supposibly ADRESSED MEMBER.
>>The replies or requests are pretty natural, as a lot of work has to be
done
>to the earlier send
>>mails generating these requests, work that is widely appriciated,
>recoqnised and much welcomed.
>>
>>This OFCOURSE is NOT implementing that these answer-mails are unimportant,
>far from that
>>actualy, as they are, in particular, to the adressed list-member.
>>But to the exceptance that they are not important to ANY OTHER
>List-members, as they cannot
>>find ANY employment for them.
>>
>>Therefore please ask 'your' senders of these
>"no-List-related-contents"-mails to send these
>>directly to the applicable rightious List-members' private email-adresses.
>>This will then save, ALL of the other List-members, on unnessacery
>load-receiving- and deleting
>>handlings.
>>
>>Thanks in advance for the cooperation in this, the help is hereby given,
>>
>>Regards,
>>Ton Maas
>>Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
|