[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Grabbing an alligator by the tail



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>Hi Manoj, 
</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I have no 
idea how to smooth the moving averages (MAs) of the alligator ( its no doubt 
proprietary), but I was able to get a close approximation.&nbsp; What I did was 
use the MA indicator creator of MS 6.5 and create each moving average 
separately.&nbsp; You can color them the desired color, and offset them 
horizontally as required (read the guided tour). Then lay each MA on a chart and 
finally save the chart as a template. Be aware that you are using median price 
vice close in the MAs. See page 160 of users manual.&nbsp; This template works 
pretty well for me.&nbsp;</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If you're 
interested in the Profitunity approach....I recommend Bill Williams' <U>Trading 
Chaos</U> . Lots of info on where the ideas in &quot;Investors Dream&quot; 
originated. As far as the $2500.00 he wants for his Home Study Course.....I 
ain't got it. And even if I did, I think I would first spend alot of time with 
the approach as detailed in the book and prove it viable for me before I 
invested further. It seems to me (after massive internet user group searches) 
that the trading approach is the secondary issue.&nbsp; The primary issues that 
must be mastered being <U>discipline/psychology </U>and <U>money management</U>. 
So keep that in mind as you search out your approach and before you drop $2500 
bucks for a course.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT>Thanks for the 
fractal info.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Good trading,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>Rod</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT 
color=#000000></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Jul 07 12:06:34 1998
X-POP3-Rcpt: neal@xxxxxxxxx
Return-Path: <owner-metastock-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
          by purebytes.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id LAA31195 for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:13:05 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05876
	for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:47:26 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: freeze.metastock.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from smtp.amigo.net (amigo.net [209.94.64.30])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA05871
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:47:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from amigo.net ([209.94.74.55]) by smtp.amigo.net
          (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-0U10L2S100)
          with ESMTP id AAA12256 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
          Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:40:43 -0600
Message-ID: <35A25D98.D9857FCE@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 11:40:40 -0600
From: Leo Karl <leokarl@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Wyckoff Method
References: <000201bda9bb$39b84cc0$58ce4cc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



Any opinions or experience with the Wyckoff Method of trading,
especially with the $850 course offered by the Stock Market Institute of
Phoenix, AZ?

I sent for their literature describing the course which I have heard
described as very good, but "a lot of work".  The literature is a bit
vague, and generalized.

I would be interested in any comments, both pro and con.

Thanks,

Leo