PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>Hi Manoj,
</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000> I have no
idea how to smooth the moving averages (MAs) of the alligator ( its no doubt
proprietary), but I was able to get a close approximation. What I did was
use the MA indicator creator of MS 6.5 and create each moving average
separately. You can color them the desired color, and offset them
horizontally as required (read the guided tour). Then lay each MA on a chart and
finally save the chart as a template. Be aware that you are using median price
vice close in the MAs. See page 160 of users manual. This template works
pretty well for me. </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000> If you're
interested in the Profitunity approach....I recommend Bill Williams' <U>Trading
Chaos</U> . Lots of info on where the ideas in "Investors Dream"
originated. As far as the $2500.00 he wants for his Home Study Course.....I
ain't got it. And even if I did, I think I would first spend alot of time with
the approach as detailed in the book and prove it viable for me before I
invested further. It seems to me (after massive internet user group searches)
that the trading approach is the secondary issue. The primary issues that
must be mastered being <U>discipline/psychology </U>and <U>money management</U>.
So keep that in mind as you search out your approach and before you drop $2500
bucks for a course.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT>Thanks for the
fractal info.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Good trading,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>Rod</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT
color=#000000></FONT></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Jul 07 12:06:34 1998
X-POP3-Rcpt: neal@xxxxxxxxx
Return-Path: <owner-metastock-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by purebytes.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id LAA31195 for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:13:05 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05876
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:47:26 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: freeze.metastock.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from smtp.amigo.net (amigo.net [209.94.64.30])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA05871
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:47:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from amigo.net ([209.94.74.55]) by smtp.amigo.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-0U10L2S100)
with ESMTP id AAA12256 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Tue, 7 Jul 1998 11:40:43 -0600
Message-ID: <35A25D98.D9857FCE@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 11:40:40 -0600
From: Leo Karl <leokarl@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Wyckoff Method
References: <000201bda9bb$39b84cc0$58ce4cc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Any opinions or experience with the Wyckoff Method of trading,
especially with the $850 course offered by the Stock Market Institute of
Phoenix, AZ?
I sent for their literature describing the course which I have heard
described as very good, but "a lot of work". The literature is a bit
vague, and generalized.
I would be interested in any comments, both pro and con.
Thanks,
Leo
|