|
Hello,
There is no need for appologies. I see no problem with any
discussion
as long as it has "a little bit of AmiBroker flavour"
:-)
Best regards,
Tomasz
Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:31
PM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [amibroker] Re:
update Saturn uranus opposition .
hi,
I am a regular reader here though i
dont post much since long .
I made a mistake of not marking off
topic .My sincere apologies
to anyone. It was an oversight
,Just forgot to do so .
I am just interested in
these highly volatile and troubled times
whether anyone has worked on any
afl and used amibroker in
concert with astrological planet aspects
and postions in a asingle
application .
There
are trading software available who have the astro ephemeris
inbuilt but
they lack in backtester and also individual analysis
capabilities for the same .
. Astrologers basically dont like
to share their methods of work
since the topic has a rather wide latitude
and there is a problem of
proof and theory and basically a problem of
ridicule .Its not just maths .
So i posted a trading
analysis just so if someone a regular practitioner
in financial
markets may contact and share even of any afl he may have
worked with
or is working on .
Once again my apologies .
On 3/6/09, brian_z111 <brian_z111@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and
AmiBroker-related >stuff.
> I guess that there are other lists
where you can discuss astrology.
I thought it was a discussion
on Astrological Trading, not Astrology per se, AND Natasha invited anyone
from the group to discuss AmiBroker applications.
Did you read her
posts and look at the attachments where she marked some astrologically
significant points (her defintion not mine) on an AmiBroker
chart?
Isn't that ON TOPIC.
OR I am misunderstanding N's posts
and the forum' rules?
> Please return to
AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly >mark
> your
off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum >rules,
>
so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
I
agree that it is courtesy to mark OT as OT.
However, could you please
clarify what is OT e.g. here are two of your posts ... one is a Youtube
video where US interest rates are being discussed and another is a
discussion on the US financial system and paper money.
They were both
started by you and WERE NOT marked as OT.
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/114069
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/119088
I
guess it depends on our personal viewpoint but I think Astrological Trading,
where the Hulbert digest (an independent review) ranks AstroTraders as 1
& 2out of 10, for 2008, has more relevance to trading than commentary on
economic indicators.
I notice that no one bothered to make an
objective analysis of that claim e.g. is it a one off fluke OR has an
AstroTrader been in the top ten on other occasions?
Many of the
posters were too busy falling over themselves to try to be funny that they
didn't have the time to follow their own "Law of Objective
Analysis'.
Also, Amibroker has built-in drawing tools for Gann Fans
and Fibonacci and they have no scientific credibility so why single out
Astro Trading as 'allowable for forum members to make 'innocent' fun of and
post 'anus' jokes about'?
My inclination was to email the moderator
asking him to take down the 'fun poking' posts that were 'going nowhere' and
collectively intended to ridicule Natasha.
Is there a difference
between ridicule and humiliation?
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko"
<groups@xxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry but
this is OFF TOPIC discussion.
>
> This mailing list is to
discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related stuff.
>
> I guess that
there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
>
>
Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly
mark
> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum
rules,
> so people can filter out off-topic subjects
automatically.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> -----
Original Message -----
> From: Natasha ~~!!!
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, March 06,
2009 7:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus
opposition .
>
>
> The top ten Paid Newsletters in order
are with gains ..
> according to Hulbert .
>
> 2008's Top
Ten
> 1. Crawford Perspectives +42.4%
> 2. Peter Eliades
Stockmarket Cycles 20.8%
> 3.
>
--
Warm
Regards;
`````` Natasha
!!!
To achieve, you need thought. You have to know what you are doing and
that's real power.
“When you see that trading is done, not by
consent, but by compulsion - when you see that in order to produce, you need
to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see money flowing
to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get
richer by graft and pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against
them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded
and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is
doomed.” ~ 1857 Ayn R. ~ Atlas Shrugged
__._,_.___
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
![]()
__,_._,___
|