Sorry , but imo the new forms are critic and counter intuitive.
C(5) looks back 5 bars.... what would looking forward look like? C(-5)?
imo, very confusing. I can't help but wonder what made this idea surface :-))
herman
Thursday, February 19, 2009, 11:08:25 AM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> As a convenience feature I was contemplating for some time to allow
> shorter syntax to very common operation of referring to past elements of the array.
> As you now current syntax to refer to past is:
> Ref( array, -bars )
> So close five bars back is Ref( C, -5 )
> I don't have any technical problem with adding new
> operator that will make it shorter,
> but I am wondering about the most preferrable "form",
> that is easy to use and does not create confusion.
> So I would like to ask you which
> "short form" would you prefer.
> - C@x
> - C#5
> - C(5)
> - I don't like the idea at all
> Please use this poll to vote:
> Thank you.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ------------------------------------
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> (Yahoo! ID required)
> <*> To change settings via email:
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: