Sorry
, but imo the new forms are critic and counter intuitive.
C(5)
looks back 5
bars.... what would looking forward look
like? C(-5)?
imo,
very confusing. I can't help but wonder what made this idea surface
:-))
herman
Thursday,
February 19, 2009, 11:08:25 AM, you wrote:
>
Hello,
> As a
convenience feature I was contemplating for some time to allow
> shorter
syntax to very common operation of referring to past elements of the
array.
> As you now
current syntax to refer to past is:
> Ref( array,
-bars )
> So close
five bars back is Ref( C, -5 )
> I don't have
any technical problem with adding new
> operator
that will make it shorter,
> but I am
wondering about the most preferrable "form",
> that is easy
to use and does not create confusion.
> So I would
like to ask you which
> "short form"
would you prefer.
> -
C@x
> -
C#5
> -
C(5)
> - I don't
like the idea at all
> Please use
this poll to vote:
> Thank
you.
> Best
regards,
> Tomasz
Janeczko
>
amibroker.com
>
------------------------------------
> ****
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group
is for the discussion between users only.
> This is
*NOT* technical support channel.
> TO GET
TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at}
amibroker.com
> TO SUBMIT
SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> (submissions
sent via other channels won't be considered)
> For NEW
RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> Yahoo!
Groups Links
> <*> To
visit your group on the web, go to:
> <*>
Your email settings:
>
Individual Email | Traditional
> <*> To
change settings online go to:
>
(Yahoo! ID required)
> <*> To
change settings via email:
> <*> To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> <*>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: