PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello,
I am sorry guys for ommission of C(-5) option. I have edited the poll, but
that unfortunatelly erased the votes placed already, so please re-submit your vote.
I appologize once again for this inconvenience.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Ludwig" <Thomas.Ludwig@xxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] A shorter syntax to reference past elements of array
Hello,
I agree with this view. Shortening ref(C, -5) to C(-5) is fine but not to
C(5) - that's confusing. It's a pity that this option is not offered in
the poll.
Thomas
> Sorry , but imo the new forms are critic and counter intuitive.
>
> C(5) looks back 5 bars.... what would looking forward look like?
> C(-5)?
>
> imo, very confusing. I can't help but wonder what made this idea
> surface :-))
>
> herman
>
> Thursday, February 19, 2009, 11:08:25 AM, you wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As a convenience feature I was contemplating for some time to allow
> > shorter syntax to very common operation of referring to past
> > elements of the array. As you now current syntax to refer to past
> > is:
> >
> > Ref( array, -bars )
> >
> > So close five bars back is Ref( C, -5 )
> >
> > I don't have any technical problem with adding new
> > operator that will make it shorter,
> > but I am wondering about the most preferrable "form",
> > that is easy to use and does not create confusion.
> >
> > So I would like to ask you which
> > "short form" would you prefer.
> > - C@x
> > - C#5
> > - C(5)
> > - I don't like the idea at all
> >
> > Please use this poll to vote:
> > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/surveys?id=2828485
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> >
> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|