Howard hasn't posted for a while.
We can't presume... he is a 
  volunteer also and doesn't make much 
money out of his books... unless AB 
  is paying?
It comes down to Tomasz.
Hopefully Herman is talking to 
  Tomasz.
Herman is very good in that role.
Remember that Herman, 
  Tomasz and I have worked together before.
We know each other quite 
  well, in that regard e.g they know I am a 
bit grumpy to work with and 
  Herman knows the way I like to work...I 
always wanted to have an open 
  format.... there was support for a Wiki 
Help Manual at the ATP.... in the 
  workforce I found out that people 
can be trusted... if you trust them they 
  won't let you down.
I used to post my files on the company intranet, 
  without any 
protection, and no one ever did them any harm.
We 
  should have learnt the lessons from the UKB and now we need to 
move on to 
  markII - I hope it wasn't all for nothing - we are so 
close.
It 
  would be a shame to waste all of it.
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, 
  "lou" <loulh@xxx> wrote:
>
> This is one post I strongly 
  agree with. Perhaps Howard should be 
brought 
> into the discussion 
  on how to help finance a new book. Perhaps a 
guaranteed 
> number of 
  sales or whatever.
> 
> PS - The many many good ideas raise hope 
  that this time a solution 
will 
> indeed be found.
> 
> 
  lou howard
> 
  =====================================================
> 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "sidhartha70" 
  <sidhartha70@...>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com>
> 
  Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 2:57 AM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Help 
  Manual
> 
> 
> > Brian is right that the Help manual is 
  incomplete and inadequate.
> >
> > I don't buy the argument 
  that "we shouldn't expect it to be 
complete
> > because AmiBroker 
  is cheap".
> >
> > I know it's just TJ and Marcin, but 
  that's TJ's choice. I've 
stated
> > before, and I'll state again, 
  I would happily pay $500 for 
AmiBroker
> > IF it had great 
  on-line help manuals. IF it had something along 
the
> > lines of 
  a decent beginners, intermediate and advanced users 
guide.
> > 
  And I'm sure new incremental users would come on board as 
  
AmiBroker
> > becomes more 'accessbile' to the masses.
> 
  >
> > I took the plunge with AmiBroker, and there is absolutely no 
  
doubting
> > it's a fine product.
> >
> > The 
  users of AmiBroker deserve to get the same support as they 
would
> 
  > if they chose to purchase one of the C# based alternatives - 
  
namely
> > Ninja, RightEdge or OpenQuant etc. IF they have to pay 
  more for 
that
> > support, then so be it... TJ can hire someone 
  to work solely on 
new
> > user guides for the next 6 months. 
  Shouldn't cost too much.
> >
> > Let's pretend that Howard 
  produces a 'beginners' book for 
AmiBroker,
> > then another one 
  for more advanced users, say focusing on the 
custom
> > 
  backtester... suddenly we've got three books for AmiBroker coming 
  
in
> > at $50 each... that's $150.
> >
> > 
  Personally I'd be happy with either solution. A Howard provided
> > 
  alternative that costs $150, or an in-house AmiBRoker one that 
  
adds
> > $150 to AB price.
> >
> > But let's at 
  least have one of the two alternatives.
> >
> >
> > 
  --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, 
  "Steve Dugas" <sjdugas@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Jeez 
  Brian, even TJ admits that everything is not perfect, but 
there
> 
  > are
> >> only 24 hours in a day and how much harder do you 
  think he can 
work?
> > He is
> >> human like the rest 
  of us, if you spot an error or ommision, just
> > report it
> 
  >> so he can fix it.
> >>
> >> Steve
> 
  >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: 
  "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
> >> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com>
> 
  >> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 7:08 PM
> >> Subject: 
  [amibroker] Help Manual
> >>
> >>
> >> 
  >
> >> > There are far too many Help Manual questions posted 
  in this 
forum.
> >> >
> >> > This takes up 
  our valueable time answering questions that 
should have
> >> 
  > been answered by AmiBroker.
> >> >
> >> > 
  In fact they waste far more time than OT posts.
> >> >
> 
  >> > Our precious time would be far better spent answering more 
  
interesting
> >> > questions.
> >> >
> 
  >> > Some of the features in AB aren't explained in the manual, 
  
some things
> >> > are out of date and sometimes the 
  explanations are a bit 
cryptic.
> >> >
> >> 
  > Example:
> >> >
> >> > Prettify was added 
  to the Formula Editor in beta version 5.04
> >> > - included in 
  devlog under version 5.05 Feb08
> >> > - official release v5.10 
  in June08 which includes manual 5.10
> >> >
> >> 
  > Ami website PDF manual is still version 5.00
> >> 
  >
> >> > - Search PDF for prettify == nothing
> 
  >> > - Search AB manual version 5.1 for prettify == nothing
> 
  >> > - Use AB site search engine == nothing
> >> > - 
  Google amibroker.com == 3 hits from devlog
> >> > - devlog 
  records release but has no info about it and no
> > explanation 
  in
> >> > the read me
> >> > - searched KB == 
  nothing
> >> > - searched UKB == nothing
> >> 
  >
> >> > The screenshot of the FE edit dropdown menu, in the 
  Help 
Manual is out
> >> > of date (at least it looks 
  different to my version 5.10)
> >> >
> >> > http://www.amibroker.com/guide/w_afledit.html
> 
  >> >
> >> > The Devlog just says that the Prettify 
  function was added ...
> > looked in
> >> > the AFL 
  function list and couldn't find anything... is it a
> > function 
  or
> >> > a function()?
> >> >
> >> 
  > New features should be explained in the official help manual 
  
that
> > comes
> >> > out immediately after the 
  beta inclusion.
> >> > We should not have to search elsewhere 
  but even if we do we, 
in this
> >> > case, we still find 
  nothing.
> >> >
> >> > It shouldn't be up to 
  volunteers to explain help manual items 
in this
> >> > 
  forum, or the UKB, or anywhere else.
> >> >
> >> 
  > It saves AB some effort if they don't have to keep the manual 
up 
  to
> >> > date but the effort is transferred to the volunteers, 
  who have 
to
> >> > answer it scores of times, instead of AB 
  answering it once.
> >> >
> >> > If we all took 
  the rationalist approach, that some people are
> >> > 
  advocating e.g. "users should have skills or lower their 
sights or 
  pay
> >> > Graham", and charged AB for the time we spend 
  providing AB 
support
> > then
> >> > the program 
  would cost thousands of dollars and wouldn't look 
so
> > 
  cheap,
> >> > up against other software, afterall
> 
  >> >
> >> > brian_z
> >> >
> 
  >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
  > ------------------------------------
> >> 
  >
> >> > Please note that this group is for discussion 
  between users 
only.
> >> >
> >> > To get 
  support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> >> > 
  SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >> >
> >> > For NEW 
  RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check 
DEVLOG:
> >> 
  > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> 
  >> >
> >> > For other support material please check 
  also:
> >> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> 
  >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> 
  >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> 
  >
> >
> >
> > 
  ------------------------------------
> >
> > 
  Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> 
  >
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly 
  to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > For NEW 
  RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> 
  >
> > For other support material please check also:
> > 
  http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> 
  > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> 
  >
>