|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> How far would we want this 'simulated chart trading' facility to
> extend...? Would they just be 'at market' buys and sells...? Would
>you
> be able to place stops for each trade based off the chart too...?
>Are
> we talking about placing this information on the chart in replay
>mode
> so that we are simulating being at the RHS of the chart...?
Good questions.
I am sure others can do better than me (I think Herman is a way ahead
of us on this).
My opinion....as a minimum.... what I would like to see... a buy/sell
tear off button ... like my trading platform ....click to action...
trades are recorded ... a 'LiveTest' summary/report is available,
with metrics, the same as a 'BackTest' report....... reports are
saved for later use via Report Explorer.
Using that model, the live tester, would reference the 'BackTester'
settings e.g. for initial equity and other relevant settings.
The 'LiveTester' report could be accessed via AA after the session.
I guess we would need to pause/continue a session by choice.
That is the minimalist model (most bang for the buck?).
Why stop there?
Herman has been talking about a fully blown chart trading approach.
I am not sure exactly what his approach entails but he is definitely
a Chart Trader AND a programmed rules Trader so the scope seems to be
there to put it all together in one feature.
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@xxx>
wrote:
>
> I agree Mike in that I don't yet see the WFA angle here. Perhaps
Allan
> could expand on this.
>
> However, I do see the value in being able to breakdown daily
> 'discretionary portfolio returns & risk' (whether it's genuinely a
> portfolio or one instrument) into the usual analysis metrics.
>
> How far would we want this 'simulated chart trading' facility to
> extend...? Would they just be 'at market' buys and sells...? Would
you
> be able to place stops for each trade based off the chart too...?
Are
> we talking about placing this information on the chart in replay
mode
> so that we are simulating being at the RHS of the chart...?
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Mike" <sfclimbers@> wrote:
> >
> > I can certainly see the value in calculating a full suite of
metrics
> > based on the discretionary trades made via clicking on a chart
over a
> > given time period. These would be the equivalent of a mechanical
> > trader's backtest results and would be the benchmark by which
> > approaches were measured.
> >
> > But, how exactly would a discretionary trader perform a WFA given
> > that WFA is the application of optimized parameters upon untested
> > data?
> >
> > I doubt that you are suggesting that the discretionary trader
would
> > manually iterate over the same chart trying different approaches,
and
> > that AB (or any other product) would then have to somehow figure
out
> > what the methodology was in order to apply that logic into the
next
> > out of sample period. Yet, that would be the only way to marry
the
> > two concepts (i.e. discretionary and WFA).
> >
> > Even if the software did have some kind of artificial
intelligence
> > that could capture logic based on the discretionary trades made
> > within a period, what would be the point? The discretionary
trader
> > would not confine themself to the signals produced by the WFA. If
> > they did, they would no longer be discretionary, but instead be
> > mechanical traders :)
> >
> > It seems to me that WFA is the exact opposite of discretionary
> > trading.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "matrix10014" <allansn@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Sidhartha,
> > > No offense to anyone,but it is a bit of a messy solution and
one
> > that
> > > is good enough to make one dangerous.
> > >
> > > It certainly appears that a skilled programmer could make the
> > > necessary changes to bring it to a professional level,but I am
> > > certainly not that person.
> > >
> > > IMHO,whether one is a discretionary trader or system trader,the
> > > ability to perform some sort on WFA is essential,and the very
same
> > > analytics/statistics should be available to both styles.
> > >
> > > Does anyone think the discretionary traders at firms such as
SAC
> > > capital simply wing it,while the stat arb boys have all the
> > > firepower??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I took a look at Herman's thread Mike and I personally think
it's
> > a
> > > > bit of a messy solution to what Allan is requesting.
Basically he
> > > > wants something of 'professional' quality rather than tacked
on.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Mike" <sfclimbers@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Your comment on simulated discretionary trading was
addressed
> > > earlier
> > > > > in the thread by Herman, though perhaps not to the degree
of
> > > backtest
> > > > > metrics that you might be after.
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/128437
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "matrix10014" <allansn@>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi T,
> > > > > > As a discretionary trader,I find the charting package
in
> > Ami
> > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > excellent.The only gripe I have is that one can not shift
to
> > > higher
> > > > > > time frames(daily to weekly) without the chart and
trendlines
> > > > > jumping
> > > > > > all over the place,i.e.,from one date to the next.Without
> > > having
> > > > > the
> > > > > > end dates locked(far right dates),multiple time frame
> > analysis
> > > > > > becomes a very difficult task,and analysis is rendered
> > > useless.Its
> > > > > > essential that the far right side of the chart have the
same
> > > date
> > > > > on
> > > > > > any time frame.I discussed it in the past,but you had
your
> > own
> > > > > > views.Sadly,I had to go to another program.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On another note,and far more important, a discretionary
> > trader
> > > > > needs
> > > > > > the same risk management tools that a system trader
does.The
> > > two
> > > > > > styles are not so disimilar that a system trader has the
> > > benefit of
> > > > > > full backtesting/optimisation/WFA while the discretionary
> > > trader
> > > > > > should be left to perform his analysis with a
pencil,paper
> > and
> > > > > > abacus.Ami should offer the capability to SIMULATE
> > > discretionary
> > > > > > trading.That means the ability to point and click on the
> > chart
> > > and
> > > > > > record all Entrys(long and short),Exits,and stops with
> > > > > > pyramiding/scaling capabilities.In addition full
reporting
> > > should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > available with a scaled down version of backtest results
as
> > > well as
> > > > > > the capability to export the trades should one wish to do
> > > perform
> > > > > > further analysis,i.e position sizing,Money management.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unless one is performing algorithmic trading/mean
reversion
> > > > > > strategies,I think there is a fine line between rule
based
> > > trading
> > > > > vs
> > > > > > discretionary.Granted the approachs are different,but
once a
> > > trade
> > > > > is
> > > > > > on,one still has to manage it with the very best tools
> > > > > > available.Hopefully,Ami can level the playing field
between
> > the
> > > > > > system "tools" vs the "discretionary" tools avaiable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Allan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Allan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko"
<groups@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I appreciate all suggestions and there is really no
problem
> > > > > > > in adding new features provided that there is demand
for
> > them.
> > > > > > > I specifically asked for charting suggestions, as this
is
> > way
> > > > > > > more "subjective" thing than backtesting and other rule-
> > based
> > > > > tools.
> > > > > > > Discretionary traders seem to be very sensitive to all
those
> > > > > > > little details and aesthetics. These are are sometimes
easy
> > > to
> > > > > > develop
> > > > > > > sometimes not, but unless you hear the feedback it is
not
> > > possible
> > > > > > > to know what every single person uses.
> > > > > > > So again, feedback is appreciated. If possible and not
too
> > > time
> > > > > > consuming
> > > > > > > for you, I greatly appreciate filling the issue via
> > feedback
> > > > > > center. If not,
> > > > > > > I can keep track on my internal list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > > > > amibroker.com
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@>
> > > > > > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:30 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: 'Rule Based'
> > versus 'Discretionary'
> > > > > > trading...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How97,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I agree. You've stated nothing that I haven't already.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I do use other software... MarketDelta & have been
> > looking
> > > at
> > > > > > Ninja
> > > > > > > > with a market profile plug in as an alternative.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Like others, I'm not desperately keen on using
multiple
> > > software
> > > > > > > > systems. I'd rather try and get it under one roof.
And
> > the
> > > > > truth
> > > > > > is it
> > > > > > > > really wouldn't be hard for TJ to add some of that
> > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm adding my voice to a largely dominant rule based
> > > crowd... I
> > > > > > hope
> > > > > > > > you're ok with free expression of wishes and
ideas...??
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think others have also made it clear on this thread
> > that
> > > > > they'd
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > to see some more functionality on the charting side
too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "how97"
<101.158294@>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I believe it is clear that the large majority of the
AB
> > > users
> > > > > > want
> > > > > > > >> to have the possibility for rule-based trading,
> > > backtesting,
> > > > > > > >> automatic analysis, automatic trading etc. For that
> > group
> > > > > > Amibroker
> > > > > > > >> is just excellent and it is constantly enhanced in
these
> > > > > > > >> possibilities. And that is what the large majority
of
> > its
> > > > > users
> > > > > > > >> wants. And AB strongly supported by its users and
driven
> > > by
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > > >> wishes.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The large majority of users is clearly not the
> > > discretionary
> > > > > > > >> traders. These may need better or specialized
charting.
> > > That
> > > > > may
> > > > > > > >> well be. If this better charting software exists
already
> > > as
> > > > > you
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > >> saying, why are you not using it, why did you come
here
> > to
> > > AB?
> > > > > > What
> > > > > > > >> were you looking for?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I think it is also a clear preference of Tomasz to
> > develop
> > > AB
> > > > > > into a
> > > > > > > >> direction where most of its users wants to ahve it.
And
> > > that
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > >> good. A lot of the stuff in AB is much too complex
if
> > you
> > > are
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > >> looking for other kinds of charting. So why bother?
You
> > > need
> > > > > to
> > > > > > use
> > > > > > > >> a different software.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> By the way: In my opinion AB allows excellent
charting.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > > > >> how97
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70"
> > > <sidhartha70@>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > From my perspective, and this is really why I
> > connected
> > > > > > charting to
> > > > > > > >> > the ideas of 'rule based' vs 'discretionary'
> > trading...
> > > if
> > > > > you
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > >> a
> > > > > > > >> > discretionary trader, from a software perspective
it
> > is
> > > ALL
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > >> > visibility. If the software you are using doesn't
or
> > > can't
> > > > > > give you
> > > > > > > >> > the best visibility available then you are at a
> > > > > disadvanatge.
> > > > > > You
> > > > > > > >> > can't make sensible discretionary trading
decisions
> > > without
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > > >> able
> > > > > > > >> > to see how current market structure has evolved,
what
> > > market
> > > > > > > >> dynamics
> > > > > > > >> > are at play, how the auction process is evolving
at
> > > > > different
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > >> > frames etc..etc.. You simply don't get that from
bar &
> > > > > candle
> > > > > > > >> charts.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Hence my obsession with Market Profile &
Equivolume
> > and
> > > > > > generally
> > > > > > > >> more
> > > > > > > >> > accessability and adaptability to AmiBroker's
charting
> > > > > > facilicites.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Currently it's a fabulous piece of software,
> > > particualrly
> > > > > > for 'rule
> > > > > > > >> > based' traders.... But probably a less fabulous
piece
> > of
> > > > > > software
> > > > > > > >> for
> > > > > > > >> > discretionary day traders for example. But of
course,
> > I
> > > > > > appreciate,
> > > > > > > >> > it's hard to be all things to all men...
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ken Close
> > <ken45140@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > One simple suggestion for charting improvement:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Put in the ability to insert a "Tab" character
in a
> > > Title
> > > > > > > >> statement
> > > > > > > >> > in order
> > > > > > > >> > > to make it easier to produce multi-line tables
> > > > > > with "columns"
> > > > > > > >> left
> > > > > > > >> > justified
> > > > > > > >> > > no matter how many decimal places in previous
values
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > same
> > > > > > > >> row. I
> > > > > > > >> > > have done it via complex IIF statements but how
nice
> > > it
> > > > > > would be
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> > insert
> > > > > > > >> > > the code for a tab character to create columns.
No,
> > I
> > > do
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > >> want to do
> > > > > > > >> > > this with the gfx commands (too complex for this
> > > > > > application).
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Ken
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >> > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > >> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > > >> > On Behalf
> > > > > > > >> > > Of Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:33 PM
> > > > > > > >> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [amibroker] 'Rule Based'
> > > > > versus 'Discretionary'
> > > > > > > >> trading...
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Not wanting to hijack this thread but whenever I
ask
> > > about
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > >> itemized
> > > > > > > >> > > list of what is exactly "weak" in AB charting, I
> > don't
> > > > > > receive
> > > > > > > >> any
> > > > > > > >> > > meaningful reply. I would really want to know
some
> > > > > objective
> > > > > > list
> > > > > > > >> > instead of
> > > > > > > >> > > statements I heard on ET that "charts are ugly"
> > which
> > > for
> > > > > me
> > > > > > > >> > unfortunatelly
> > > > > > > >> > > means nothing, considering the hunderds of ways
> > charts
> > > can
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> customized
> > > > > > > >> > > according to user taste in AB.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between
> > users
> > > > > only.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
> > > directly to
> > > > > > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always
check
> > > > > DEVLOG:
> > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|