[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SV: [amibroker] Re: 'Rule Based' versus 'Discretionary' trading...



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

How97,

You speak for your own personal interests as a systems-only-trader. You should look at things from TJ’s side as well. Since he asked us, it is clear that he wants some input on how to improve Amibroker’s charting side as well.

 

By the way, you are very much mistaken if you think that discretionary traders have no use for Amibroker and its AFL capabilities. I have constructed quite a few models that I use, and have lots more coming, that in no way are for system users only. There seems to be a widespread perception that all that discretionary traders do is draw a few trendlines, label some Elliott Waves, and look at a few Fibonacci levels. That is not true. For instance, I have run various tests on most of the MA’s I watch in order to assign them their proper level of importance when making decisions – which was greatly simplified using Amibroker. Also, a lot of discretionary traders use quite advanced custom made indicators in order to extract more information from the market. Amibroker is excellent for those things as well.

 

No matter how much I like the program, I will continue to ask for improvements on occasion, especially when the programmer asks for input.

 

You also mention that if this and that program has better abilities, why do we not use it? The reason is this: Amibroker lacks a few minor things from that program, a few minor things from this program, and so on, while having great general and (some) advanced charting capabilities. For TJ to gradually add a few useful things from other programs to further improve Amibroker for all kinds of users will in the end equal more money for TJ, which in the end equals if possible even more dedication, even better software, if possible even better support.

 

Since Amibroker in itself is not a system, from my point of view there isn’t any downside to TJ improving all aspects of Amibroker in order to attract more and more users.

 

Lastly, I know of many people who are discretionary traders at various levels of proficiency to whom I recommend Amibroker. It is a very simple and mostly user-friendly program, and you get much for the price of the program. So, until I see some statistics about the Amibroker users, I would not assume that most of them are hardcore systems or auto-systems traders that desperately need all of the (arguably very good and useful) features you mentioned, nor would I assume that even if most customers are system traders, that they would disapprove of new charting features, features that in the end may give them new ideas for their system designs.

 

Well, just my 0.13 SEK, and I am not yet an Immortal.

 

Best regards / JM

 


Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] För how97
Skickat: den 19 augusti 2008 17:17
Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ämne: [amibroker] Re: 'Rule Based' versus 'Discretionary' trading...

 

I believe it is clear that the large majority of the AB users want
to have the possibility for rule-based trading, backtesting,
automatic analysis, automatic trading etc. For that group Amibroker
is just excellent and it is constantly enhanced in these
possibilities. And that is what the large majority of its users
wants. And AB strongly supported by its users and driven by their
wishes.

The large majority of users is clearly not the discretionary
traders. These may need better or specialized charting. That may
well be. If this better charting software exists already as you are
saying, why are you not using it, why did you come here to AB? What
were you looking for?

I think it is also a clear preference of Tomasz to develop AB into a
direction where most of its users wants to ahve it. And that is
good. A lot of the stuff in AB is much too complex if you are just
looking for other kinds of charting. So why bother? You need to use
a different software.

By the way: In my opinion AB allows excellent charting.

Regards
how97

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@...>
wrote:
>
> From my perspective, and this is really why I connected charting to
> the ideas of 'rule based' vs 'discretionary' trading... if you are
a
> discretionary trader, from a software perspective it is ALL about
> visibility. If the software you are using doesn't or can't give you
> the best visibility available then you are at a disadvanatge. You
> can't make sensible discretionary trading decisions without being
able
> to see how current market structure has evolved, what market
dynamics
> are at play, how the auction process is evolving at different time
> frames etc..etc.. You simply don't get that from bar & candle
charts.
>
> Hence my obsession with Market Profile & Equivolume and generally
more
> accessability and adaptability to AmiBroker's charting facilicites.
>
> Currently it's a fabulous piece of software, particualrly for 'rule
> based' traders.... But probably a less fabulous piece of software
for
> discretionary day traders for example. But of course, I appreciate,
> it's hard to be all things to all men...
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, Ken Close <ken45140@> wrote:
> >
> > One simple suggestion for charting improvement:
> >
> > Put in the ability to insert a "Tab" character in a Title
statement
> in order
> > to make it easier to produce multi-line tables with "columns"
left
> justified
> > no matter how many decimal places in previous values in the same
row. I
> > have done it via complex IIF statements but how nice it would be
to
> insert
> > the code for a tab character to create columns. No, I do not
want to do
> > this with the gfx commands (too complex for this application).
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com]
> On Behalf
> > Of Tomasz Janeczko
> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:33 PM
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> > Subject: Re: [amibroker] 'Rule Based' versus 'Discretionary'
trading...
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Not wanting to hijack this thread but whenever I ask about some
itemized
> > list of what is exactly "weak" in AB charting, I don't receive
any
> > meaningful reply. I would really want to know some objective list
> instead of
> > statements I heard on ET that "charts are ugly" which for me
> unfortunatelly
> > means nothing, considering the hunderds of ways charts can be
customized
> > according to user taste in AB.
> >
>

__._,_.___

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___