|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
This is what is already happening with Herman and Al co-authoring many UKB posts.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Brown" <see3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:29 AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
> TJ and Brian,
>
> Sorry to butt into the middle of this interesting thread, but I was
> wondering if a further compromise could be added? Perhaps, a UKB
> author could grant editing privileges to other specific registered
> authors who are trusted and talented. That would allow material to
> be expanded on or corrected and also give the possibility of Team or
> Joint projects between author collaborators.
>
> Dennis
>
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 6:57 PM, brian_z111 wrote:
>
>> No I didn't know that.
>>
>> That's why I leave all of the hard work to you ;-)
>>
>>
>> brian_z
>>
>>
>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> As you know well, I am all for openess, and in a perfect world I
>> would
>>> say "edit whatever you wish (also other people material) anytime
>> and anywhere".
>>>
>>> But unfortunatelly we are not living in a perfect world and
>> allowing editing by anyone
>>> would destroy the quality of UKB.
>>> Wikipedia, as you know has FULL-TIME editors/admins
>>> who don't do anything but watch for the changes and revert cases of
>> vandalism,
>>> the have dozens of programs that watch pages etc
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit
>>>
>>> You would be surprised how much work I have with moderation of
>> comments
>>> (literally hundreds of spammers every day attempting to UKB spam
>> via comments)
>>>
>>> If editing was open to everyone without any control the UKB would
>> be flooded
>>> with spam/porn links/advertising within seconds.
>>>
>>> So current scheme of one-time simple registration and editing posts
>> by author only is actually good balance
>>> between maximum openess and maintenance costs.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tomasz Janeczko
>>> amibroker.com
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxx>
>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:09 AM
>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
>>>
>>>
>>>> Als0 - the reason I have supported Tomasz and AmiBroker is
>> because he
>>>> is talented, creative and hardworking (haveing a go) and likewise
>> to
>>>> a lot of the people he has attracted around him (who are there
>> for
>>>> the same reason as me).
>>>>
>>>> I hope that isn't too schmaltzy for you all.
>>>>
>>>> F.T.R
>>>>
>>>> I think what is most likely to slow me down at the UKB (and bring
>> me
>>>> to a halt) is that I am starting to build up a volume of work and
>>>> eventually it has to be maintained - links break, stuff gets out
>> of
>>>> date - people report the errors (as they should).
>>>>
>>>> The task of maintaining what I have writen is going to become a
>>>> burden.
>>>>
>>>> FTR - I personally didn't want the structure we have.
>>>>
>>>> I wanted "open authorship" so that other AB users could edit my
>> work
>>>> (correct mistakes, add updates, add extensions, rewrite it if it
>>>> wasn't clear etc). That way the site would have remained self
>>>> managing and always have dynamic content.
>>>>
>>>> I was also interested in participating in joint development where
>> I
>>>> might put up one of my half-finished projects that needs code
>> input
>>>> and the codesters could continue it to where ever (sometimes I do
>>>> come up with one or two good ideas that people would like).
>>>>
>>>> Brian_z
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I respectfully disagree. "Distributed content" is just nice name
>>>> for a mess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Imagine that wikipedia authors posted only links to their own
>> sites
>>>>> instead of publishing directly on wikipedia site. The value of
>>>> wikipedia
>>>>> is because it contains actual content in ONE place instead of
>> just
>>>> links.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore it is stronly encouraged to post actual CONTENT, not
>> the
>>>> links
>>>>> to your own site. Excessive linking to your own site may be
>>>> considered as
>>>>> free advertising and this list is not a place to get free
>>>> advertising.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Tomasz Janeczko
>>>>> amibroker.com
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "progster01" <progster@>
>>>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 4:46 PM
>>>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if a lot of people had their own pages (commercial or not)
>>>>>>> it would add up to an awesome reference manual even though we
>> do
>>>>>>> lose 'search from one desk'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway the time has come to add a page for our Amifriends
>> links.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with the above. Thanks, Brian, for your continuing
>>>>>> positively-oriented comments and efforts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm a believer in distributed content, and I think the most
>>>> effective
>>>>>> "learning webs" going forward are going to be those which
>>>> recognize
>>>>>> the advantages and reality of author choice in "point of
>>>> publishing".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The URL is the great tie that binds! :^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regardless of the origin of the initial impulse to write, when
>> I
>>>> post
>>>>>> something substantive which I think may have reference value, I
>>>>>> generally choose to make the best presentation I can, using
>> the
>>>> best
>>>>>> (and most well-known) tools available to me, and then to
>> publish
>>>> it
>>>>>> once in one place, with links elsewhere as seems helpful and
>>>> appropriate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For anyone who wants to read in more detail about why I
>> publish
>>>> the
>>>>>> way I do, I've written some about it in a post
>> entitled 'Content
>>>> Here,
>>>>>> Links Elsewhere - Reasons Part 1', which can be found here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3a8s6k
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise, onwards! I don't propose to discuss this further
>> here
>>>> on
>>>>>> the AB Yahoo list, because I think it is tangential to the
>>>> questions,
>>>>>> answers, and AB-related discussions that takes place here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I value everyone's contributions to these AB discussions, in
>>>> whatever
>>>>>> format works for them, wherever published and however linked
>> to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to you all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. I'd also suggest if ever it seems like a link I've
>> provided
>>>> is
>>>>>> down that a) it's probably just a temporary issue, and b) email
>>>>>> directly to me about it would make less clutter for this
>> list.
>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that this group is for discussion between users
>> only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly
>> to
>>>>>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
>> DEVLOG:
>>>>>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For other support material please check also:
>>>>>> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>>>>
>>>> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
>>>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>>>
>>>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>>>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>>>
>>>> For other support material please check also:
>>>> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>>
>> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>
>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>
>> For other support material please check also:
>> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|