|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes, that it a good idea.
Once again I will bring it up to Herman (I think we might have to go
in house on that one).
Thks,
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dennis Brown <see3d@xxx> wrote:
>
> TJ and Brian,
>
> Sorry to butt into the middle of this interesting thread, but I
was
> wondering if a further compromise could be added? Perhaps, a UKB
> author could grant editing privileges to other specific registered
> authors who are trusted and talented. That would allow material
to
> be expanded on or corrected and also give the possibility of Team
or
> Joint projects between author collaborators.
>
> Dennis
>
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 6:57 PM, brian_z111 wrote:
>
> > No I didn't know that.
> >
> > That's why I leave all of the hard work to you ;-)
> >
> >
> > brian_z
> >
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Brian,
> >>
> >> As you know well, I am all for openess, and in a perfect world I
> > would
> >> say "edit whatever you wish (also other people material) anytime
> > and anywhere".
> >>
> >> But unfortunatelly we are not living in a perfect world and
> > allowing editing by anyone
> >> would destroy the quality of UKB.
> >> Wikipedia, as you know has FULL-TIME editors/admins
> >> who don't do anything but watch for the changes and revert cases
of
> > vandalism,
> >> the have dozens of programs that watch pages etc
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit
> >>
> >> You would be surprised how much work I have with moderation of
> > comments
> >> (literally hundreds of spammers every day attempting to UKB spam
> > via comments)
> >>
> >> If editing was open to everyone without any control the UKB would
> > be flooded
> >> with spam/porn links/advertising within seconds.
> >>
> >> So current scheme of one-time simple registration and editing
posts
> > by author only is actually good balance
> >> between maximum openess and maintenance costs.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tomasz Janeczko
> >> amibroker.com
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
> >> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:09 AM
> >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
> >>
> >>
> >>> Als0 - the reason I have supported Tomasz and AmiBroker is
> > because he
> >>> is talented, creative and hardworking (haveing a go) and
likewise
> > to
> >>> a lot of the people he has attracted around him (who are there
> > for
> >>> the same reason as me).
> >>>
> >>> I hope that isn't too schmaltzy for you all.
> >>>
> >>> F.T.R
> >>>
> >>> I think what is most likely to slow me down at the UKB (and
bring
> > me
> >>> to a halt) is that I am starting to build up a volume of work
and
> >>> eventually it has to be maintained - links break, stuff gets out
> > of
> >>> date - people report the errors (as they should).
> >>>
> >>> The task of maintaining what I have writen is going to become a
> >>> burden.
> >>>
> >>> FTR - I personally didn't want the structure we have.
> >>>
> >>> I wanted "open authorship" so that other AB users could edit my
> > work
> >>> (correct mistakes, add updates, add extensions, rewrite it if it
> >>> wasn't clear etc). That way the site would have remained self
> >>> managing and always have dynamic content.
> >>>
> >>> I was also interested in participating in joint development
where
> > I
> >>> might put up one of my half-finished projects that needs code
> > input
> >>> and the codesters could continue it to where ever (sometimes I
do
> >>> come up with one or two good ideas that people would like).
> >>>
> >>> Brian_z
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I respectfully disagree. "Distributed content" is just nice
name
> >>> for a mess.
> >>>>
> >>>> Imagine that wikipedia authors posted only links to their own
> > sites
> >>>> instead of publishing directly on wikipedia site. The value of
> >>> wikipedia
> >>>> is because it contains actual content in ONE place instead of
> > just
> >>> links.
> >>>>
> >>>> Therefore it is stronly encouraged to post actual CONTENT, not
> > the
> >>> links
> >>>> to your own site. Excessive linking to your own site may be
> >>> considered as
> >>>> free advertising and this list is not a place to get free
> >>> advertising.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Tomasz Janeczko
> >>>> amibroker.com
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "progster01" <progster@>
> >>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 4:46 PM
> >>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> if a lot of people had their own pages (commercial or not)
> >>>>>> it would add up to an awesome reference manual even though we
> > do
> >>>>>> lose 'search from one desk'.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyway the time has come to add a page for our Amifriends
> > links.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree with the above. Thanks, Brian, for your continuing
> >>>>> positively-oriented comments and efforts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm a believer in distributed content, and I think the most
> >>> effective
> >>>>> "learning webs" going forward are going to be those which
> >>> recognize
> >>>>> the advantages and reality of author choice in "point of
> >>> publishing".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The URL is the great tie that binds! :^)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regardless of the origin of the initial impulse to write, when
> > I
> >>> post
> >>>>> something substantive which I think may have reference value,
I
> >>>>> generally choose to make the best presentation I can, using
> > the
> >>> best
> >>>>> (and most well-known) tools available to me, and then to
> > publish
> >>> it
> >>>>> once in one place, with links elsewhere as seems helpful and
> >>> appropriate.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For anyone who wants to read in more detail about why I
> > publish
> >>> the
> >>>>> way I do, I've written some about it in a post
> > entitled 'Content
> >>> Here,
> >>>>> Links Elsewhere - Reasons Part 1', which can be found here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3a8s6k
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Otherwise, onwards! I don't propose to discuss this further
> > here
> >>> on
> >>>>> the AB Yahoo list, because I think it is tangential to the
> >>> questions,
> >>>>> answers, and AB-related discussions that takes place here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I value everyone's contributions to these AB discussions, in
> >>> whatever
> >>>>> format works for them, wherever published and however linked
> > to.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to you all!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> P.S. I'd also suggest if ever it seems like a link I've
> > provided
> >>> is
> >>>>> down that a) it's probably just a temporary issue, and b)
email
> >>>>> directly to me about it would make less clutter for this
> > list.
> >>> Cheers!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please note that this group is for discussion between users
> > only.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly
> > to
> >>>>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
> > DEVLOG:
> >>>>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For other support material please check also:
> >>>>> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
> >>>
> >>> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> >>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >>>
> >>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
DEVLOG:
> >>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >>>
> >>> For other support material please check also:
> >>> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> >
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > For other support material please check also:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|