[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

No I didn't know that.

That's why I leave all of the hard work to you ;-)


brian_z


--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> 
wrote:
>
> Brian,
> 
> As you know well, I am all for openess, and in a perfect world I  
would
> say "edit whatever you wish (also other people material) anytime 
and anywhere".
> 
> But unfortunatelly we are not living in a perfect world and 
allowing editing by anyone
> would destroy the quality of UKB.
> Wikipedia, as you know has FULL-TIME editors/admins
> who don't do anything but watch for the changes and revert cases of 
vandalism,
> the have dozens of programs that watch pages etc
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit
> 
> You would be surprised how much work I have with moderation of 
comments
> (literally hundreds of spammers every day attempting to UKB spam 
via comments)
> 
> If editing was open to everyone without any control the UKB would 
be flooded
> with spam/porn links/advertising within seconds.
> 
> So current scheme of one-time simple registration and editing posts 
by author only is actually good balance
> between maximum openess and maintenance costs.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:09 AM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
> 
> 
> > Als0 - the reason I have supported Tomasz and AmiBroker is 
because he 
> > is talented, creative and hardworking (haveing a go) and likewise 
to 
> > a lot of the people he has attracted around him (who are there 
for 
> > the same reason as me).
> > 
> > I hope that isn't too schmaltzy for you all.
> > 
> > F.T.R 
> > 
> > I think what is most likely to slow me down at the UKB (and bring 
me 
> > to a halt) is that I am starting to build up a volume of work and 
> > eventually it has to be maintained - links break, stuff gets out 
of 
> > date - people report the errors (as they should).
> > 
> > The task of maintaining what I have writen is going to become a 
> > burden.
> > 
> > FTR - I personally didn't want the structure we have.
> > 
> > I wanted "open authorship" so that other AB users could edit my 
work 
> > (correct mistakes, add updates, add extensions, rewrite it if it 
> > wasn't clear etc). That way the site would have remained self 
> > managing and always have dynamic content.
> > 
> > I was also interested in participating in joint development where 
I 
> > might put up one of my half-finished projects that needs code 
input 
> > and the codesters could continue it to where ever (sometimes I do 
> > come up with one or two good ideas that people would like).
> > 
> > Brian_z
> > 
> > 
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I respectfully disagree. "Distributed content" is just nice name 
> > for a mess.
> >> 
> >> Imagine that wikipedia authors posted only links to their own 
sites
> >> instead of publishing directly on wikipedia site. The value of 
> > wikipedia
> >> is because it contains actual content in ONE place instead of 
just 
> > links.
> >> 
> >> Therefore it is stronly encouraged to post actual CONTENT, not 
the 
> > links
> >> to your own site. Excessive linking to your own site may be 
> > considered as 
> >> free advertising and this list is not a place to get free 
> > advertising.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tomasz Janeczko
> >> amibroker.com
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "progster01" <progster@>
> >> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 4:46 PM
> >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> 
> > wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> if a lot of  people had their own pages (commercial or not) 
> >> >> it would add up to an awesome reference manual even though we 
do 
> >> >> lose 'search from one desk'.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Anyway the time has come to add a page for our Amifriends 
links.
> >> > 
> >> > I agree with the above.  Thanks, Brian, for your continuing
> >> > positively-oriented comments and efforts.  
> >> > 
> >> > I'm a believer in distributed content, and I think the most 
> > effective
> >> > "learning webs" going forward are going to be those which 
> > recognize
> >> > the advantages and reality of author choice in "point of 
> > publishing".
> >> > 
> >> > The URL is the great tie that binds!  :^)
> >> > 
> >> > Regardless of the origin of the initial impulse to write, when 
I 
> > post
> >> > something substantive which I think may have reference value, I
> >> > generally choose to make the best presentation I can, using 
the 
> > best
> >> > (and most well-known) tools available to me, and then to 
publish 
> > it
> >> > once in one place, with links elsewhere as seems helpful and 
> > appropriate.
> >> > 
> >> > For anyone who wants to read in more detail about why I 
publish 
> > the
> >> > way I do, I've written some about it in a post 
entitled 'Content 
> > Here,
> >> > Links Elsewhere - Reasons Part 1', which can be found here:
> >> > 
> >> > http://tinyurl.com/3a8s6k
> >> > 
> >> > Otherwise, onwards!  I don't propose to discuss this further 
here 
> > on
> >> > the AB Yahoo list, because I think it is tangential to the 
> > questions,
> >> > answers, and AB-related discussions that takes place here.
> >> > 
> >> > I value everyone's contributions to these AB discussions, in 
> > whatever
> >> > format works for them, wherever published and however linked 
to.
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks to you all!
> >> > 
> >> > P.S.  I'd also suggest if ever it seems like a link I've 
provided 
> > is
> >> > down that a) it's probably just a temporary issue, and b) email
> >> > directly to me about it would make less clutter for this 
list.  
> > Cheers!
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users 
only.
> >> > 
> >> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly 
to 
> >> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >> > 
> >> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check 
DEVLOG:
> >> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >> > 
> >> > For other support material please check also:
> >> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >> > 
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> >
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> > 
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > 
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > 
> > For other support material please check also:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>




Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/