|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello,
I respectfully disagree. "Distributed content" is just nice name for a mess.
Imagine that wikipedia authors posted only links to their own sites
instead of publishing directly on wikipedia site. The value of wikipedia
is because it contains actual content in ONE place instead of just links.
Therefore it is stronly encouraged to post actual CONTENT, not the links
to your own site. Excessive linking to your own site may be considered as
free advertising and this list is not a place to get free advertising.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "progster01" <progster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 4:46 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxx> wrote:
>
>> if a lot of people had their own pages (commercial or not)
>> it would add up to an awesome reference manual even though we do
>> lose 'search from one desk'.
>>
>> Anyway the time has come to add a page for our Amifriends links.
>
> I agree with the above. Thanks, Brian, for your continuing
> positively-oriented comments and efforts.
>
> I'm a believer in distributed content, and I think the most effective
> "learning webs" going forward are going to be those which recognize
> the advantages and reality of author choice in "point of publishing".
>
> The URL is the great tie that binds! :^)
>
> Regardless of the origin of the initial impulse to write, when I post
> something substantive which I think may have reference value, I
> generally choose to make the best presentation I can, using the best
> (and most well-known) tools available to me, and then to publish it
> once in one place, with links elsewhere as seems helpful and appropriate.
>
> For anyone who wants to read in more detail about why I publish the
> way I do, I've written some about it in a post entitled 'Content Here,
> Links Elsewhere - Reasons Part 1', which can be found here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3a8s6k
>
> Otherwise, onwards! I don't propose to discuss this further here on
> the AB Yahoo list, because I think it is tangential to the questions,
> answers, and AB-related discussions that takes place here.
>
> I value everyone's contributions to these AB discussions, in whatever
> format works for them, wherever published and however linked to.
>
> Thanks to you all!
>
> P.S. I'd also suggest if ever it seems like a link I've provided is
> down that a) it's probably just a temporary issue, and b) email
> directly to me about it would make less clutter for this list. Cheers!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|