|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Crystal clear now. It's good to look at things on a macro-level...the big
picture enhances clarification and cleans things slick as does grease
through a goose.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerard Carey" <gcfinance@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 6:37 PM
Subject: [amibroker] OT. Re: is support down? - The Black Hole Debate
In the futhering of this debate it would seem appropriate to
investigate the recognised criteria by which the presence of an
AmiBroker Black Hole could be established.
The pre-eminent problem in actual identification arises from
observational difficulties, in that `Einstein's General Theory of
Relativity' predicted that as gravity could bend space, then the
actual existence of an object with the undoubted gravitas/gravity of
an AmiBroker black hole, could be established by observing the said
object from the perspestive of a viewer, such as Yuki, as its light
was brought into focus by being bent around another object in its
direct path, such as TJ.
There is some evidence to suggest that the view so achieved is
determined by a "Wobbling" motion on the part of one of the bodies,
but far be it from me to state categorically that either Yuki or TJ
are "Wobbly" persons.
Still it must be acknowledged that we do indeed now have a blurry,
yet undetermined, possible dark orifice of some kind in view.
We now need to establish the existence of that mass of spiralling
matter - the accretion disk, the actuality of which would confirm a
Black Hole's existence. Its size would of course confirm. well. how
big it is.
In conclusion may I state on behalf of the majority of Amibroker
users that while we `Without Hesitation' accept TJ's assertion of
Supports "Output", even this could possibly be considered further
evidence that an AmiBroker Black Hole exits.
Black holes can also eject, from their centre, relatively small
amounts of material at high speeds to form jets - the unkind amongst
us, not me of course, not in a million years, would propose that TJ
and Marcins efforts could be regarded as such.
My fervent hope is that I have added some small clarity to the debate
Yours in AB
Gerard
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxx> wrote:
I anyone getting replies from support@xxx?
I seem to be sending to a black hole.
Yuki
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|