Toey,
Hi. Again, welcome aboard.
I’m biased, but I agree - AB and QP3
is a great combo.
One thing to keep in mind is that when issues
arise, there are solutions and workarounds readily available. I don’t
know if I mentioned it, but in addition to this forum, two excellent sources are:
The online
AFL Function Reference:
http://www.amibroker.com/guide/afl/
The
online AFL library:
Latest posts to library - http://www.amibroker.com/library/
Complete library listing - http://www.amibroker.com/library/list.php
The library is a great resource for
problem solving. Even if you don’t find the specific solution you are
looking for, it’s a great place to pick up ideas and techniques.
Best regards,
Dan.
From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of toecutter6666
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005
2:58 AM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Newe User
- Some General Questions : )
Patrick, Dan and Dave,
What can I say? The quality and relevance of
your responses is simply
brilliant - sincere apologies for my tardiness in
acknowledging this
fact. What a welcome! <head spins> -
if this place is habitated by
the likes of you fellows, then a terrific product
is made even better
by such great user support (and I am very
impressed that Tomasz is so
very involved with the users as well).
It seems my questions were a little naïve, but
while trading is not
new to me, the use of AB is, so thanks for the
replies. Previously,
in my "futures" incarnation, my data
prodider and software were
packaged so that issues such as I have raised were
virtually seamless.
In my current venture, however, I will be
using CFD's to trade these
stocks, so I hope that AB's portfolio and testing
capabilities can
facilitate leveraged trades.
Taking aboard all of your advices, I have
subsequently read further
here and across the web, and will go with QP3 as a
data source, as
your consensus seems to point in this direction
– extremely well
thought out and researched results demonstrate you
chaps really know
your stuff. At the very least, AB and QP3
should provide a solid
*starting* package, while I can of course modify
over time as suits.
Regarding cheaper data sources; I'm a carniverous
SciFi reader, and
RAH's books form a significant part of my library,
so the points you
make vis-à-vis TANSTAAFL raised a guffaw here in
the office. Points
well taken.
Now to roll sleeves up & get my hands dirty!!
Your help is so greatly appreciated.
Cheers Guys,
Toey.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dave"
<dbwalsh1@xxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Toe,
> I'm an Aussie AB user, for EOD data I use
EzyCast which can produce
> MetaStock format data, which I can then read
into AB using the MS
> plugin, my annual subscription is
$195(includes ASX, SFE, World Indices,
> Forex etc) for after Midnight downloads. To
set up GICS Sectors I used
> Michael (the Oz Falcon's) ASX SETUP which can
be found in the Files
> section. He has created various scripts for
updating GICS, ASX/S&P
> Indices and now some Fundamental data. There
is also a complete ASX
> SAMPLE database up to about june this year.
This is well worth a look at
> - check out his Fundamental Indicators. As
for Intraday data, you could
> shop around for a broker that intraday charts
for your entries.Note also
> that unfortunately IB does not support the
ASX.
> All the best with your foray into stocks.
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Dan Clark
> Sent: Sunday, 9 October 2005 11:39 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [amibroker] Newe User - Some
General Questions : )
>
>
>
> Toe,
>
>
>
> I'm "Dan"
:-) Welcome to the group!
>
>
>
> Dipping one's toe (pardon the pun) into the
waters of technical analysis
> can be challenging. Sometimes,
you feel like a "Stranger In A Strange
> Land"! Lots of issues,
possibilities, and dead ends. (I know because
> I been down most of them!) Hopefully we
can help you better swim
> through the murky waters.
>
>
>
> In general, I agree with Patrick and his
comments. Look below for more
> detailed, inline comments.
>
>
>
> Regarding AB, I've used many charting and
analytical packages over the
> last six years. Many have a nicer
looking UI than AB. Some have well
> over 100 built-in indicators. Some come
with data as part of the
> package. But NONE have the power and flexibility
of AB.
>
>
>
> Here are two of my posts to the AB Yahoo user
group comparing Telechart
> and QuotesPlus:
>
>
>
> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/85659
>
> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/86251
>
>
>
> The first is my initial report about two
months ago. The second is my
> final report a few weeks later. Look
for other posts with that title.
> Other AB users added additional, excellent
information including some
> things that I missed.
>
>
>
> One other point. Since I posted the
comparison, my opinion has
> polarized even further. I would
never go back to TeleChart.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Dan.
>
>
> _____
>
>
> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of NW Trader
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 3:27 PM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Newe User - Some
General Questions : )
>
>
>
> Hi Toe,
>
>
>
> If you want a good comparison, check for the
comments Dan wrote in
> evaluation of both TC and QP this past summer
(look about the end of
> July, first part of August, thread subject:
Report on Quotes Plus Data,
> or search for Quotes Plus). For several
reasons he switched to QP3 from
> TC2005. I continue to use both.
>
>
>
> I'm a TA trader (swing and intraday), I trade
for a living, and do some
> sorts/explorations on fundamental data
(usually on the weekends). I use
> end of day data feeds from QP and TC2005 (TC
also has intraday updating,
> ~ 15-20 min delayed), and intraday data feeds
from eSignal, and (via
> QuoteTracker) Prophet.net and several
brokerages. Intraday I mostly
> rely on the eSignal data to feed AB (trades
and watchlists) and do some
> scans on large watchlist using TC2005
delayed. I have multiple
> computers, multiple broadband connections and
maintain multiple data
> bases (both end of day and intraday) for
AB. But to respond to your
> questions:
>
>
>
> 1st: If I do a FA scan or sort in QP3/TC2005,
can the results be
> imported into AB, so I can then run TA over
those results? Yes -- but
> for the most part, I don't know why you would
want to do so -- AB
> explorations run much faster than either QP
or TC. You can access most
> (if not all) of the fundamental data fields
in QP using the
> "GetExtralData()" command. TC
has virtually no fundamentals exposed to
> AB. But yes, ticker lists generated
from any source can be imported
> into AB watchlists from .lst, .tls, .txt, or
.csv files with a simple
> Import procedure.
>
> [Dan] I strongly agree on this
point. I very much like using QP data
> in AB, especially for its access to
"ExtraData". Initially I tried
> running scans in TC and then importing the
results into AB. It was a
> serious hassle!!!
>
>
>
> Currently I have two scans that each take 12
to 15 minutes to run in AB.
> 90% of the functionality of these scans can
NOT be implemented in either
> TC or QP. One piece of the second
scan was originally designed for TC.
> It took 19 separate, manual steps to
implement in TC. Now I just ONE
> push a button in AB.
>
>
>
> I'm a database architect by profession (fancy
name for a database
> developer). My professional
opinion of Telechart's programming
> language and architecture is that it is
seriously flawed. The Watchlist
> sorting has some nice features, but much of the
scanning process is
> based on loading PCFs into Watchlist and then
sorting, selecting,
> sorting again, flagging, unflagging,
etc. Initially it sounds great,
> but you hit the "wall" pretty
fast.
>
>
>
> For example, let's say that you have a scan
that looks for stocks whose
> price is diverging from an indicator (that's
the 19 step one mentioned
> above). My scan resulted in about
90 stocks that met criteria. From
> there it was a manual review of the
charts. OK, I could deal with that.
> So I reviewed each of the 90 stocks and
loaded the interesting 10-15
> interesting ones into a Watchlist.
Great! Until the next day.
>
>
>
> Then I ran the scan again. Guess
what?!? The scan found most of the 90
> stocks from day one plus a few more in day
two. Now why would I want
> to re-review the symbols that are already in
my "Stalking" Watchlist or
> ones that I've already decided to exclude!?!
>
>
>
> So, I posted to the Worden support forum -
"How can I exclude symbols?
> Can I set up an 'Exclude'
Watchlist?" Their response: "Sorry, that
> can't be done. What you can do is
manually review your list of 2000
> tradable stocks and delete the ones you don't
want." My response: "Uh,
> right! Sure! Happy
to!" NOT!
>
>
>
> (You might detect a certain level of
frustration here.)
>
>
>
> Conversely, if I approached things via TA 1st
in AB, can I export
> results from AB into either QP3 or TC2005 for
further FA? Yes, you can
> export explorations or scan results to .lst,
.tls, .txt, or .csv files
> with a simple export procedure to create a
list to import elsewhere. If
> you just want to create a watchlist to track
in QP, TC or Excel,
> certainly that can be done. I rarely
use the chart or other programs
> that come with QP as AB "does it
all" for me so QP (and for the most
> part) TC2005 are merely data feeds any more.
>
> [Dan] Patrick is correct. You
can. It's very easy. However, I can't
> imagine doing that. With QP
data, you can do much more in AB. For
> example, here is a "Commentary"
Patrick wrote and shared with me. All
> of the data is retrieved and calculated
directly from QP price, volume
> and fundamental data. Virtually all of
this data can be used in an AB
> scan, exploration or chart:
>
>
>
> STOCK REPORT with Fundamental Data available
from Quotes Plus for:
> LKQX
>
>
>
> COMPANY NAME: LKQ CORP-COM
>
>
>
> Briefing: LKQ Corporation is a
nationwide provider of recycled OEM
> automotive products and related services. For
the 6 months ended
> 6/30/05, revenues increased 32% to $269.8M.
Net income increased 46% to
> $16M. Revenues reflect higher volume of
products sold, an increase in
> number of customers served and business
acquisitions. Net income also
> reflects improved operating margins and
increase in interest and other
> income.<P><P>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************** SUMMARY INFORMATION
**************************
>
> FOR: 10/7/2005
>
>
>
>
CLOSE: 30.50
>
>
Volume:
115,659
>
>
>
> High Close in past 21 days: 30.67
>
>
>
> 52 Week High Close: 32.00
>
> 52 week Low Close: 13.60
>
>
>
> Options: Options are NOT traded
on this
issue
>
>
>
> Market
Capitalization
741.2
>
>
>
> QuotesPlus Relative
Strength: 87.000
>
>
>
> Beta - issue
Volatility:
0.000
>
> ADX(14) =
15.7
Trend: Down
>
> ATR(5) = 1.04
>
>
>
> Gizzard Stock Criteria
Met: YES
>
> DAY TRADER POTENTIAL: NO
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************** DETAIL INFORMATION
*******************************
>
>
>
> --- Share and Volume Data -----
>
>
>
> Number of Shares (millions):
24.30
>
>
>
>
Date:
10/7/2005
>
> Volume (millions):
0.116 % of 21 day MA: 59.7%
>
> Daily Average Volume Traded prior
5 days (millions): 0.222
>
> Daily Average Volume Traded prior 21 days
(millions): 0.192
>
> Daily Average Volume Traded prior 50 days
(millions): 0.184
>
>
>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
> --- Stock Ownership
Information ---
>
>
>
> Shares Outstanding
(millions):
21.23
>
> Shares Float
(millions):
18.00
>
>
>
> Float Turnover (days, based on 10 day Avg
Vol) 63.30
>
>
>
> Percent of Shares held by
Institution:
57.79%
>
>
>
> Short interest
(millions):
0.90
>
> Float / Short
Ratio:
20.02
>
> Short Interest as % of Shares
Outstanding: 4.2%
>
> Short Interest as % of
Float:
5.0%
>
> Days to Cover
Short:
4.644
>
>
>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
> --- Fundamental Data ---
>
>
>
> High PE range:
0.000
>
> Low
PE
range: 0.000
>
> Price/Earnings Growth
Ratio: 0.000
>
> Annual
Dividend: 0.000
>
>
>
> Cash Flow per
Share:
1.461
>
> Long term debt to
equity:
0.244
>
> Return on
Equity:
12.205
>
> Bookvalue in dollars per share: 10.804
>
>
>
> 1-year growth rate of earnings per
share: 14.972
>
> 5-year growth rate of earnings per
share: 68.185
>
> One Year Projected EPS
Growth: 17.073
>
> Two Year Projected EPS
Growth: 17.708
>
> Three Year Projected EPS
Growth: 16.000
>
> TTM Sales: 23.617
>
> TTM
EPS: 1.110
>
>
>
>
>
> One month price
change: 62.00%
>
> Three month price change:
280.00%
>
> Six month price
change: 1,100.00%
>
> One year price
change: 1,691.00%
>
>
>
> Is there any validity in purchasing *both*
products given the redundancy
> of many features in each if I had both?
This is idiosyncratic -- I do,
> as each has data and features that I find
useful (intraday updates in TC
> so I can quickly scan larger stock
watchlists, albeit delayed,
> fundamentals in QP not available in TC,
etc). The nominal cost of 25-30
> a month is a fraction of my trading expenses
(several trade commissions)
> and I believe they easily pay for themselves
-- can't say that about
> other data vendors I've used, however.
It is no problem to have both
> databases on the same machine, to
export/import scan/exploration results
> between the two (e.g., I scan for low float
issues in QP, then send to a
> watchlist in the TC supported AB database to
scan against because TC
> doesn't provide float data). As to
program features, I really don't use
> either QP or TC programs much -- perhaps I'll
look at TC occasionally
> for a fast intraday update to a PCF/EZ Scan
generated list.
>
> [Dan] QP does not provide intraday updates to
data, only EOD. That's
> about the only benefit that I can think
of. But I'm a swing trader. I
> don't trade intraday any more. So
that's not an issue for me.
>
>
>
> If I want intraday updates, I can get the
data from Interactive Brokers.
> I'm thinking about getting an EOD
subscription to eSignal just for the
> one-minute data. Neither TC nor
QP provide this. QP only does daily
> data and TC only provides 15 minute bars real
time (at $100/month!).
>
>
>
> Also, I do not use the QP charting and
analysis tools except maybe to
> audit the data. I believe that Patrick
uses TC data to compare to QP
> data. That's another advantage of
having both. For me, the cost is
> less of an issue. It's the hassle of
keeping two systems updated. For
> me, it's just not worth the hassle.
>
>
>
> 2nd: I am an EOD swing style trader, but
would like access on some
> occasions to *intraday* data for optimal
entries and exits. Is there a
> way that this data can be obtained easily and
cheaply for those times I
> need it, for certain equities? Depends
on what you want and how you
> trade -- I time my entries on the shorter
trades, and somewhat for the
> longer swings as well. I use
intraday updates from TC2005 for delayed
> data (to update a larger database for general
scans) and other real-time
> data vendors (for trade, breakout and other
watchlist updates) . I do
> not use (or recommend) "free" data,
as many years ago I found that it
> was not reliable enough to risk my trading
money on (especially
> Quote.com's stuff). It sounds trite,
but Robert Heinlein's TANSTAAFL
> (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch)
applies. But it's up to
> you. You might want to check out
Medved's QuoteTracker
> (http://www.quotetracker.com/)
as a means to track issues and import
> data cheaply/freely to AB. As noted
above, I can use intraday data from
> Prophet.net data ( http://www.prophet.net/), PCQuote, and
data from my
> brokers in QT and then access it in AB (via
the QT plug-in). QT
> supports a number of free and inexpensive
data vendors and brokers (see:
> http://www.quotetracker.com/qsources.shtml
), including some in
> Australia. Note as well that
if you want intraday data, you will want
> to get the RT version of AB (AB Pro), not the
standard.
>
> [Dan] I agree on TANSTFFL. You
can get intraday data from Interactive
> Brokers. It's free if you have an
account. You can get up to 5 days
> of backfills. I've tried it
and it works pretty well. For me, I'm
> just as happy using the charting provided by
my broker to fine tune my
> order. But then again, my trading
volume is on the order of trades per
> month not trades per day (like Patrick).
>
>
>
> I don't really understand what
"backfill" is, but I suspect that has
> something to do with what I'm asking
here... Backfill is simply getting
> data for periods prior to the time you start
accessing the data (whether
> in AB or some other program). It is
data vendor specific. Some data
> vendors provide it (and in varying amounts
and periods), others do not
> (see the QT data vendor list for
examples). ESignal (www.esignal.com)
> provides 10 days of tick and 120 days of 1
minute historic intraday
> data. Unless you have been accumulating
data for a particular issue,
> get a vendor that provides it if you need
it. You need it if you want
> to look at intraday support and resistance,
pivot points, volume at
> price, etc. to help time your entry. If
you've had the stock on a
> watchlist you've been tracking and
accumulating intraday data (in AB
> there's no limit to the amount you can
accumulate), then you may not
> need it. If you like to trade a stock
you've done no workup on but hear
> that there's some news that's moving it, or
want to look at recent
> intraday history of a stock that you've
identified from an end of day
> scan and added to AB, you need it.
Again, you will need AB Pro.
>
> [Dan] Interactive Brokers provide 5 days of
backfill.
>
>
>
> 3rd: It is essential to me that GICS
breakdowns into Sector/Industry
> Group/Industry etc are available and updated
in whatever DB I use. Who
> maintains this - the data supplier or
AB? I'm not certain what you mean
> by GICS breakdowns. To me industry and
sector assignments are a
> secondary issue, not essential, so I've not
spent much time on it. I
> trade patterns principally, but do look for
them in Sectors. Generally,
> if your data vendor does it (both QP and TC
have their systems of
> assignment) it saves you al lot of time, but
you can set up your own in
> AB. You might read Dan's comments or
ask him as he is much more attuned
> to this issue, and there was a discussion
with in the past couple months
> on sector assignment issues.
>
> [Dan] If you want GICS, you do NOT, repeat
NOT, NOT, NOT want Telechart.
> They have a flattened hierarchy with over
thirty sectors. They have
> Tobacco as a sector!!! QP
uses a mapping that is similar to, but not
> quite like GICS I believe. Actually, I
rather like QP's mapping.
>
>
>
> 4th: I realise that QP3 and TC2005 only
provide their data for the US
> stock markets. Does anybody know where
similar (ie GICS-sorted, OHLC
> and key fundamentals) might be available for
ASX (Australian) listed
> stocks? Ask Graham or the other Aussies
here and look in the files
> section for the ASX files. ESignal does
supply foreign exchange data,
> so do other data vendors. I have no
experience with any as I trade the
> US NASDAQ issues almost exclusively.
Try GTW - (Google the Web).
>
>
>
> I would need such data to be usable in AB,
and again, a cost effective
> solution would be preferred! Is is
possible to maintain you own ticker
> lists and somehow use them to gather free EOD
data (eg: Yahoo) for use
> in AB, or is this not worth the effort given
all of the GICS groupings
> and constant changes etc. Yes, you can set up
and manage your own ticker
> list database and use a free data source in
AB. But repeat after me, "
> Cheap, Quick, Working" -- pick any 2,
but you can't have all three (AB
> is the only exception I know of that proves
this rule). If it's Quick
> and Working, it's going to cost more, if it's
Cheap and Working, it's
> going to take some time, and if it's Cheap
and Quick, it won't work
> well. My time is spent trading, not
adjusting data bases (for splits,
> mergers, new tickers, ticker changes,
dividends, etc., as well as
> maintaining assignments to Sectors,
Industries, etc), so I'm quite
> willing to pay a data vendor to do that,
provided they do. QP and TC
> are worth it.
>
> [Dan] I agree completely. One big
issue for you will be the Sector and
> Industry mappings. With QP (and TC),
you just click a button to import
> all of the Sectors and Industries AND the
Stock to Industry/Sector
> mappings.
>
>
>
> As professional database developer, I've
built many systems that cleanse
> and manage data. I'm very
qualified to do it. But I would NEVER,
> EVER do it for my stock data.
Managing data is one serious hassle. I
> don't have the time.
>
>
>
> Pay the bucks to QP, TC, eSignal or whoever
and let them do it.
>
>
>
> I am quite adept at writing complex excel
formula, so I hope that a)the
> AFL is similar in construction and concept,
and that b) I can contribute
> in a worthwhile manner here in the
future!! I'm not a programmer, not
> particularly adept (but moderately
proficient) in excel, and I've been
> able to learn to program AFL. IMHO,
it's not hard. Others are
> certainly better than I and there are some
capabilities of AB that I've
> never bothered to learn, but the user group
is a great community of
> sharing, Tomasz is a paragon of patience and
exemplar of incredible user
> support, and (as Dan has eloquently explained
at diverse times) AB is
> like an onion with layers of capability that
can be peeled to suit any
> user's needs and abilities. Welcome,
good luck and do let us know what
> you come up with.
>
> [Dan] If you can write Excel code, you can
probably program AB. You
> will probably have some head-scratching
session like you would with any
> analytical/charting tool you
buy. It's just part of the learning
> process. When you feel more
comfortable with it, you can be more
> aggressive.
>
>
>
> One of the WONDERFUL things about AB is the
ability to peel back the
> covers. Just create a chart and insert
some indicators into panes.
> Then, right-click on a pane and click
"Edit Formula". A window will
> pop up and display the code that creates your
chart. You can make a
> few changes, click the "check"
button to validate the code, then click
> save. Your changes appear in the
chart.
>
>
>
> Or, you can download formulas from the
formula library and insert them
> into charts and scans. Most of
the things that you will want to
> program have already been coded and exist in
the library. Just
> download a copy, try it and then modify to
taste. (Tip: Effective
> programmers copy a lot. We haven't the
time to waste.)
>
>
>
> For example, here's a simple momentum
indicator from the library:
>
> http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=539
>
>
>
> And here's a nice looking "MACD and
histogram divergence detection" AFL,
> which I just downloaded:
>
> http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=562
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Peace and Justice ---
Patrick
>
>
>
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion
between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an
e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Investment
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Investment+management+software&w1=I
>
nvestment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Inve
>
stment+property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+a
>
nalysis+software&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=_XXUzbE9l5lGlZNcM
> u4KNQ> management software
Real
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Real+estate+investment+software&w1=
>
Investment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Inv
>
estment+property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+
>
analysis+software&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=5_sgDczz3ArKGMtJ
> 9tFSJA> estate investment software
Investment
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Investment+property+software&w1=Inv
>
estment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Invest
>
ment+property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+ana
>
lysis+software&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=_N6zcwefgp4eg5n6oX5
> WZw> property software
> Software
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Software+support&w1=Investment+mana
> gement+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investment+propert
>
y+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+softwa
>
re&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=MJ2jP31F3n64RDZkDadU8w>
support
> Real
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Real+estate+investment+analysis+sof
>
tware&w1=Investment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+softwa
>
re&w3=Investment+property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+in
>
vestment+analysis+software&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=GmF8PlA
> JASx0wrSaX5-Zlw> estate investment
analysis software Investment
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Investment+software&w1=Investment+m
>
anagement+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investment+prop
>
erty+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+sof
>
tware&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=aMgGsKT4w29dMAYUzQUKzg>
> software
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your
group "amibroker
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker>
" on the web.
>
>
> * To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
<mailto:amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
>
> * Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
.
>
>
> _____
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS