|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
DT
Yes the original filter was not the best choice, a better choice
would be
Filter = ticker !="";
Andrew
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS"
<TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:
> Andrew uses a nice trick.
> Although ORdNum = Status("StockNum"); refers to the whole
database,
> he counts through it the specific list.
> [comment the SetOption("NoDefaultColumns",True); line to see what
I
> mean]
> The filter condition
> Filter = result;
> means
> Filter = result!=0;
> BTW, Andrew, what shall we do if, instead of RSI(), we have, for
> example, MACD(), who may accept zero values ?
> Dimitris Tsokakis
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Andrew" <a.perrin@xxxx> wrote:
> > Yuki
> > Try this AFL, BUT TAKE CARE WHERE YOU INSERT YOUR CODE. This
AFL
> > uses foreign statements to perform your code on your list of
> > stocks. Place your code in the wrong place and the results you
> will
> > get won't relate to "list" stock. Stocks in report are only
those
> > in your list, but they are displayed in order.
> >
> > List = "MSFT,INTC,BEAS,CSCO";
> > ORdNum = Status("StockNum");
> > sym = StrExtract( List, ORdnum );
> > ticker = "";
> > result = 0;
> > if(sym != "")
> > {
> > SetForeign(Sym);
> > Ticker = Name();
> > //Start your code
> > Result = RSI();
> > //finish your code
> > RestorePriceArrays();
> > }
> > Filter = result;
> > SetOption("NoDefaultColumns",True);
> > AddTextColumn(ticker,"Ticker");
> > AddColumn(result,"RSI");
> >
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxxx>
wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > Saturday, December 6, 2003, 7:08:59 AM, you wrote:
> > >
> > > A> Yuki I don't see any automatic sort taking place in the
first
> > > A> column when I run the AFL, I have to Click to sort so the
> > > A> solution is beyond me
> > >
> > > Actually, when I played with this some more, I got some
> > understanding
> > > of what is happening.
> > >
> > > When you turn off the default columns, they disappear, but only
> > > visually in the case of 'ticker'. The initial report order will
> > > apparently be sorted exactly the same as if that column was
still
> > > present. Strange to me that an exploration would print to the
> > screen
> > > using a sort category that isn't even present in the report,
but
> > that
> > > is surely what I'm seeing.
> > >
> > > It's not that bad to have to click on the myorder column head
to
> > > resort of course, but it was a disappointment to realize that
> > dumping
> > > the initial column that seemed to be controlling the initial
sort
> > > order was a complete waste of time.
> > >
> > > Yuki
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|