|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxxx> wrote:
> Hi DT,
>
> Monday, November 17, 2003, 6:35:42 PM, you wrote:
>
> DT> With the beginning of this year, a beautiful inverted H S
> DT> [per=3] was already formated.
>
> DT> The ^N225 values were about 8700, the near perspective of the
> DT> invH S was ~9800 in 20 bars and the target price was
>
> DT> 10800 in 40 bars.
>
> I look. I look again. I don't see it.
Yuki,
What is that again ?
What is a H&S ? Is it an objective T/A formation [for all of us] or
it is what we see [in November] and we donīt see in January ????
Well, I will go with the first choice, any alternative doesnīt make
any sense !!!
Now, if you have another "definition" for the H&S, let us do
something more creative: Write [in words] the conditions you follow,
I shall try to code them and then check them in Nikkei or any other
market for the benefit of the list.
If we choose the subjective way, then there is no reason to discuss,
congratulations for your excellent movement and fullstop.
[It would be *very* interesting and tempty to try and code the
traderīs point of view]
Dimitris Tsokakis
I'm sure somehow you have
> found a mathematical way to find it, but since I can't see it, and I
> can *clearly* *see* this current one, I don't know. Perhaps that is
> the difference: The machine cannot yet do what the human eye can do.
> All I see there is a market scraping along trying to hold 8400,
which
> it does for some time, then fails.
>
> DT> 3 days later, an equally beautiful bearish H S was ready,
> DT> the near perspective was ~8300 and the target was 7300.
>
> DT> If the ^N225 H S has a slight relation with reliable
> DT> signals, what would an aggressive trader do on Jan6 to Jan9,
2003
> DT> ??
>
> You call that little piece of junk a bearish H&S??? Okay,
subjective
> this is, but absolutely the thought would never, ever enter my mind.
> Again, all I see is a scraping along the 8400 line roughly.
>
> DT> Of course, it is not the only syndrom to characterise ^N225 as
> DT> the most tricky index. All the "heavy load" N100 techniques
>
> DT> crash on Nikkei, there is no reason to go to H S to find
> DT> it out.
>
> DT> [per=3 was the proper value for the recent
> DT> H S...]
>
> Really??? <lol> This is so obvious to me, and I can't even see the
> other one.
>
> Yes, the 225 is not for the faint of heart. It's a high-beta
> playground and one should be over 21 years of age (by a healthy
> margin) to romp around here. ^^_^^
>
> Yuki
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|