|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
Not mechanical enough ? I'm clearly a believer in the use of
mechanical systems but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the design,
building, testing and evaluation of a system needs to result in an
automated club that beats me over the head. <SPAN
class=385213116-30102003><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>
<SPAN
class=385213116-30102003>me neither. I just
want to feel like I understood how to evaluate systems well enough to make a set
of real principles out of it. it's always our choice what to actually
do.
<SPAN
class=385213116-30102003>
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
Unpredictably changing data ... hmmmm ... doesn't that warrant having
parameters for systems that aren't near cliffs on surface plots ?<SPAN
class=385213116-30102003><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>
sure,
but aren't the cliffs we're really concerned with cliffs in price behavior, not
parameter values? parameters don't change by themselves, data
does.
<SPAN
class=385213116-30102003>
is
there a necessary link between EMAs 20 through 30 all working reasonably well,
and EMA 25 being more robust than EMA 30 against data variations? is that
so obviously true that I shouldn't even be asking?
<SPAN
class=385213116-30102003>
<SPAN
class=385213116-30102003>dave
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|