[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: solving the prediction problem



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Larry Williams has nothing to do with this.  You still haven't 
understood what I meant, and I doubt you ever will.  You seem to hold 
to forever your moronic impression that statistics can prove 
anything.  May be it will prove your ignorance...

Regards,

Pal
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "MarkF2" <feierstein@xxxx> wrote:
> I don't have a good grasp of statistics and you do, LOL?  I'll take
> that as the ultimate compliment given your moronic comments on Larry
> Williams and your equally ignorant misapplication of the Central 
Limit
> Theorem and other statistical topics on this board.  Can't prove
> anything in statistics?   Wrong again (as usual)!  There are tons of
> proofs in statistics.  But that's not what you meant, right?  You 
were
> disputing the usefulness of dealing in probabilities as opposed to
> certainties, weren't you?  Hello, anyone home?  That's what trading 
is
> all about!  If you want to study a *really* good trader who also
> happens to be a mathematician and who BTW, I believe also believes
> that statistics is the most useful branch of mathematics for 
trading,
> look into William Eckhardt.
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "palsanand" <palsanand@xxxx> 
wrote:
> > I do not dispute the usefulness of statistics, only in the use of
> it 
> > to prove something, which anybody who has a good grasp of
> statistics 
> > in this planet knows, which apparently you don't.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Pal
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "MarkF2" <feierstein@xxxx> 
wrote:
> > > What planet are you from?  Statistics *is* a branch of applied
> > > mathematics and, IMHO, the single most useful for trading.
> > > 
> > > "Each of us has been doing statistics all his life, in the 
sense 
> > that
> > > each of us has been busily reaching conclusions based on 
empirical
> > > observations ever since birth." -- William Kruskal 
> > > 
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "palsanand" <palsanand@xxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Like I said earlier, Statistics is meaningless in the context 
> > that 
> > > > you can come out with statistics to disprove anything.  Proof 
> > > > requires a law or a theorem.  Only Mathematics can prove or
> > > disprove 
> > > > and that is one reason it is the greatest of all sciences.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/