|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I thought I had responded in a constructive manner, yet instead of
wanting to look at specifics which you seem not to either want to or
be able to supply, you want to have a semantic debate. the 4 .vs. 72
degree postings which I looked at briefly are as I recall a product
of the same thing, an arithmetic comparison .vs. a geometric one
where rise is being measured by point change rather than percent.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "MarkF2" <feierstein@xxxx> wrote:
> Fred, do you really think the topic of dimensional coherency and,
more
> importantly, how to apply it isn't "much of anything?" Especially
> given why it came up? Remember the 4deg and 72deg angles on the QQQ
> and ^NDX? So now you're calling me names? Hey, I'm sorry if I hurt
> your feelings enough to do that to you, but please ignore my posts
in
> the future if you can't respond in a constructive and non-demanding
> manner. Thanks :-) Mark
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" <fctonetti@xxxx> wrote:
> > You never said much of anything as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Take your prozac and be a good little boy.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|