|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
It's in TS .ela format but you get the drift and with about 5 minutes
you can recode it in afl. Basically you buy on a cross of the upper
BB and exit on a cross below below the SMA. Reverse on the short
side. I had to get out a sizable broom to clear the dust off this.
The reality is people don't sell good systems, they trade them. It's
amazing that this is still being sold and even more amazing that
people are still buying it. "Pet Rocks" don't have anything on
system software sellers.
{ --- Aberration --- }
Inputs: Length(35), StdDevUp(2.0), StdDevDn(-2.0);
Vars: UpBand(0), DnBand(0), Ave(0);
UpBand = BollingerBand(Close,Length,StdDevUp);
DnBand = BollingerBand(Close,Length,StdDevDn);
Ave = Average(Close,Length);
if ( MarketPosition = 0 ) and ( Close > UpBand )
then Buy("BE") tomorrow at market; { Enter Long }
if ( MarketPosition = 0 ) and ( Close < DnBand )
then Sell("SE") tomorrow at market; { Enter Short }
if ( MarketPosition = 1 ) and ( Close < Ave )
then ExitLong("LX") today at close; { Exit Short }
if ( MarketPosition = -1 ) and ( Close > Ave )
then ExitShort("SX") today at close; { Exit Long }
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxx> wrote:
> Re the "portfolio level testing" magic bullet.
>
> Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Palmer Wright [mailto:palmerw@x...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 8:27 PM
> To: aaft_ta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [aaft_ta] Fwd: Re: Available Portfolio testing
programs for
> TS2000i
>
>
> Since Michael forwarded the two messages (see below), he added four
> additional ones. The issue about whether a "basket system" like
Aberration
> is worth trading I will not discuss here (I still trade it). The
other main
> issue is about the effect of compounding when testing with TR
(Trading
> Recipes), and I comment here on that.
>
> Traders buy TR because it can test portfolios of systems and
markets using
> position sizing. A position-sizing strategy such as fixed-
fractional money
> management brings two advantages: it normalizes markets (eg.,
calculating
> many contracts for corn, but few for natural gas), and limits entry
risk for
> each position to a fixed- fraction of current equity--thus
preventing
> overtrading. If you do not use TR, I do not know how you can get
the large
> returns that compounding multiple markets can bring.
>
> Leslie Walko points to the potential danger of curve fitting caused
by
> compounding. I agree, and have been concerned for years about how
one market
> in a portfolio (commodity X) by being dramatically profitable in a
single
> year can misleadingly bias the results of the whole portfolio.
>
> During a multi-year test in TR, starting equity is low, perhaps
$100,000,
> but compounding raises equity to many million in later years. The
one-year
> outperformance of commodity X cand produce two kinds of curve-
fitting bias:
> early-years bias and end-years bias. Mark Johnson's message
describes the
> first, where X gives "a big turbocharged boost" to the portfolio's
equity,
> which then gives a head-start boost to the number of trades in all
the
> commodities traded. The second occurs when X's monster trades occur
in the
> final years of the simulated time period when the large number of
contracts
> makes X's profit far larger than if its big year came early. Here
the
> profits contributed by X dwarf what they were in the first case.
>
> As the message from M points out, we can avoid such biases by
normalizing
> with a fixed-dollar bet size in testing to remove the galloping
equity
> effect. I proposed this method in 1999, and still use it to compare
with the
> compounded performance. I confess, however, that my testing has
failed to
> find as much performance bias as I suspected I would find. The
method is
> most important when selecting markets for a portfolio.
>
> Palmer Wright
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Guess
> To: aaft_ta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 9:14 AM
> Subject: [aaft_ta] Fwd: Re: Available Portfolio testing programs
for
> TS2000i
>
>
> This is for Pat Mazur & Palmer Wright. Others are invited to
comment. I
> forwarded these two messages from another list because we have
discussed
> these issues in the past. It appears one of the posts is saying
Trading
> Recipes is in error in the way it calculates. In fact, that it
curve fits
> data in a particular case. Comments are invited.
>
> Michael
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|