|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
do a search in the searchable archives
for volume overflow. I think that this is what you are experiencing.
d
<span
>-----Original Message-----
From: mmqp [mailto:mmqp@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:38
PM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amibroker] strange
"cum(volume) result compared to Excel.
<span
>
<span
>Hi,<span
>
Has anyone seen this strange results from
cum(volume) as it compared
to same formula in Excel spread sheet. I
have following lines in
Auto-Analysis.
AddColumn(Volume ,"Volume",1);
AddColumn(Cum(volume) ,"CumVol",1);
filter = 1;
"Explore" on one stock; copy result to
an Excel sheet. insert
cumulative formula for volume and the results are
different in some
lines moving forward.
I would expect I get no 1's and 10's column in AB
"cum" function
because volume datas are reported with 100's as
smallest size.
However I see some 2,4,6,8 in the least
significant column. Has
anyone seen this before and have an explaination
for it?
TIA
<font size=2
face="Courier New">Send BUG REPORTS to
bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<span
>
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to:
amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: <a
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: <a
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|