|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi,
Has anyone seen this strange results from cum(volume) as it compared
to same formula in Excel spread sheet. I have following lines in
Auto-Analysis.
AddColumn(Volume ,"Volume",1);
AddColumn(Cum(volume) ,"CumVol",1);
filter = 1;
"Explore" on one stock; copy result to an Excel sheet. insert
cumulative formula for volume and the results are different in some
lines moving forward.
I would expect I get no 1's and 10's column in AB "cum" function
because volume datas are reported with 100's as smallest size.
However I see some 2,4,6,8 in the least significant column. Has
anyone seen this before and have an explaination for it?
TIA
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save Smiley. Help put Messenger back in the office.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/4PqtEC/anyFAA/i5gGAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|