[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [amibroker] Re: Articles



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


<SPAN 
class=939284213-11102002>DT,
A good 
read! IMO the events of yesterday and the (apparent) follow through of today are 
not yet compelling for a Long side bias. Remember Monday just a short while 
ago?? The market is tired of selling and looks to ANY minor event to try a 
bullish move. Unfortunately the Bears are still skittish. I fear that a lotof 
yesterday was the result of skittish Bears quickly covering short positionsas 
opposed to any full scale purchasing of stocks by the "Big Money". The large 
swings we see in the indexes and in stocks themselves represent the high 
levels of fear that still grip this market. I think it is far too early to be 
looking for any long term investments. If perhaps we have found a bottom, we may 
find ourselves in a large trading range for some time to come. This will be 
challenging for many of us who have enjoyed trends (both up and down) for 
several years now. "Take the money and run" may be the best approach until the 
market makes up its mind. Dusting off, and brushing up on the use of our non 
trending indicators may be the best approach for now. Lucky for us we have a 
treasure trove of such indicators to choose from, an ever improving software 
package to practice them on and an impressive mind bank of creative people to 
help us fine tune their best use.
<SPAN 
class=939284213-11102002> 
Or 
perhaps we are on day 2 of a huge new bull where everyone can once again become 
an "Expert" and throwing darts at the Wall Street Journal can produce impressive 
year end gains.........  :))
 
Jayson 

<FONT face=Tahoma 
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS 
[mailto:TSOKAKIS@xxxx]Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:10 
AMTo: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [amibroker] Re: 
ArticlesMany people were named guru during the bullish 
years.They were not educated in fundamental or technical analysis.They 
were just pushing prices higher and higher.MACD was a fine solution for 
charts, as long as it was not crossing its signal for months !!StochD 
was not important, it was from 60 to 90 for exrended periods.Crazy P/Eswere 
promissing huge profits not only for us but for the 3 next generations 
!!Crazy profits in new tech for example, when I payed $1800 back in 1989 
for my brand new 386 and less than the half for my PIII/800 in 2000 
!!After the end of the bubble, the same people walked the dangerous [and 
wrong] path : they continued serving the bullish dream.In any local trough, 
the very next day after the reaction, they were giving bold promises for a 
new high.The reason is simple : they did not know something else to 
do.But the market was falling again and again.Nearly 3 years later some 
people still remain on this bullish dream, some gurus still remain on the 
same side, but who cares !!They did not see the bearish reality, which is 
much more real than the bullish bubble.We should face the recent example 
: What happened yesterday ? YHOO announced a third-quarter profit of 5 cents 
a share late Wednesday, a penny above estimates, and raised its revenue 
forecast for 2002. Aetna Inc. New (NYSE:AET) had some optimistic forecasts, 
GE will announce a profit report before the Friday´s open.Are these [and 
some other minor] events the reason for an enthusiastic gap up ?I would 
consider more important to read an announcement for divident payment for 
some "great" companies.[You may see also <A 
href="">http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/10/pf/investing/q_dividends/index.htm]This 
would be a serious reason to buy and hold some "promissing" stocks of the 
"new" tech.Else I am obliged to invent new techniques to take a +10% from 
CSCO, applying a "take the money and run" logic.I will be a fool ifI 
forget that the last 2 months CSCO price did not pay any respect to ANY 
technical support.Does this behavior reflects the company perspectives [to 
apply the No 1 Stockmarket axiom]?I am not the authorised person to 
answer. Did we see any serious reply to this fundamental question by any 
authorised person ?[If positive, please let me know...]. Was there any 
serious fundamental reason to drop from $15 [Aug22] to $8.5 [Oct10] in 32 
trading days ???Probably not.We have to understand that we are alone 
in this wild market, we do not need any uneducated guru to give any 
advise.The only solution, in my opinion, is our continuous fundamental and 
technical education.And especially for this technical part, Amibroker 
forum is one of the best.Enough for now, it is 10:00 and ^Gdax 
opens.Thank you for the opportunity.Dimitris Tsokakis   
        --- In amibroker@xxxx, 
"eseward_2000" <eseward_2000@xxxx> wrote:> Thanks, Dimitris; that 
was worth reading.> > Bill> > > --- In 
amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:> > <A 
href="">http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/09/markets/strategists/index.htm> 
> Interesting and educative.> > DTPost 
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)Check 
group FAQ at: <A 
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.