|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Wanna second that, Dimitris!!!
Markus
----- Original Message -----
From: "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: settings
> Dear Tomasz,
> Let me repeat here that when we suggest something
> we do not have any intension to apply any kind of stress.
> So, if it is possible and if it does not disturb the scedule,
> a request may be satisfied sooner or later.
> On the other side, everybody in this superb site is doing his
> best and the result is an advanced level group.
> Advanced and fertile criticism gives day by day strong results.
> Many "serious" articles in popular magazines or internet T/A sites
> would not have the slightest chance to survive in this high-level
> forum.
> This may be a kind of reward for your continuous day and night
> efforts.
> I do not think that other multi-personal development has the same
> impact.
> So, keep up excellent work, we all are on your side.
> Best Regards
> Dimitris Tsokakis
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <amibroker@xxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for these suggestions. While they are welcome and very
> useful, please allow
> > me to comment why I choose certain implementation over another.
> >
> > We all know applications like Excel, Word and other "office-
> standard" ones.
> > They are written by hundreds of developers. Sometime ago I was a
> part
> > of 40-people development team in Florida-based company (much, much,
> much smaller
> > than Microsoft :-) ). In 40-people team there were people that
> worked for
> > months exclusively on small user-interface details. This is the
> case for all the companies
> > selling ten thousands copies (or more) of the software.
> > Implementing fancy user interface features *IS* time consuming.
> >
> > For AmiBroker things look different - I don't have a hundred
> developer team here -
> > I always have to find a balance between time needed to implement
> certain feature
> > and the "coolness" of features. I can not spend three weeks to
> develop "the most
> > fancy chart sheets in the world". Sometimes a little bit simpler
> (or limited) implementation
> > takes much, much less time. If this is interface-only issue I
> sometimes would prefer it.
> >
> > I am always trying to provide essential things first that decide on
> analytical power of AmiBroker -
> > later I can improve the user interface and add some cool features
> (which you can live
> > without for a while). I belive that traders are very intelligent
> people that can see
> > the raw power of the software putting much less attention to "bells
> and whistles".
> >
> > Belive me I am doing my best - for example I have developed syntax
> highlighting editor
> > within 5 days - something that takes a month for the others.
> >
> > I am always saying that AmiBroker will be improved constantly and I
> can confirm this
> > once again. Your suggestions are being implemented all the time,
> but since
> > my resources are limited not everything will be ready within a
> month.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > ===============
> > AmiBroker - the comprehensive share manager.
> > http://www.amibroker.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: jonf
> > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: settings
> >
> >
> > Here are my 2 cents suggestion about the sheets, the indicator
> list and the GUI. In general, I think it's best to avoid any
> predefined limit in any part of the GUI.
> >
> > 1) For the multiple sheet they can behave like Excel or other
> program
> > a) Non predefine number of sheet, user can add and remove them
> > b) Split separation between tab and scroll bar can be dynamically
> move
> > c) If all tab can't be display small arrow can be use to scroll
> tabs left and right
> > e) Option to place the scrollbar beside (like it is now) or on
> top of the sheet tabs
> >
> > 2) For the indicator list:
> > a) Instead of having a fixed list of Indicator, why not having a
> tree view like the stock list.
> > b) This view could be directly link to an afl file, and wouldn't
> have to reload the file each time you change the script. Some script
> could stay in memory but I think it's better to related to the script
> on file only because we never sure which afl is more current (the one
> on the file or the ones on memory).
> > c) Formula editing window could be separate from Setting and ALL
> setting could be overnight inside AFL.
> > d) When Right click on the item of the list, a menu could appear
> to decide if we want to edit the script, change the setting, add the
> indicator, run exploration, etc..
> > e) Modular script writing with #include style AND reusable
> function definition
> > f) We can also have a separate small list for Auto-Analysis and
> Commentary. The list could be a simple combo box to quickly choose a
> AFL. This list will be user configurable by using the full tree view
> list as the source.
> > g) An option to toggle off the "Always on top" of the different
> dialog would also be useful.
> >
> > Jon.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Tomasz Janeczko
> > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: settings
> >
> >
> > Hello Dimitris,
> >
> > Text tool - this is "side effect" of "snap to price". Switch it
> off
> > before using Text tool.
> > This will be of course fixed in the next version.
> >
> > Custom indicators sorting - will be added in 3.80
> > More sheets - I am considering this but there must be some place
> > left for the scrollbar :-)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
> > To: <amibroker@xxxx>
> > Sent: 12 October, 2001 09:41
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: settings
> >
> >
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > Will you add some more sheets with 3.80.?
> > (Existing 4 cover nearly the half of the job)
> > Any chance for Custom Indicators sorting?
> > Text tool is not working properly with 3.76. When I write a
> letter in
> > RSI graph at 30 position, it is placed at 5.8, which is the
> close
> > value for that date. Then I have to enter properties dialog and
> > change position. Is ot possible to fix it?
> > Best regards
> > Dimitris Tsokakis
> > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <amibroker@xxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Currently this works like that, but in the 3.8 the settings
> > > will not be affected.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tomasz Janeczko
> > > amibroker.com
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian Salter" <saltyla1@xxxx>
> > > To: "AMINewsgroup" <amibroker@xxxx>
> > > Sent: 12 October, 2001 08:15
> > > Subject: [amibroker] settings
> > >
> > >
> > > T.J.
> > > When trying to override "Maximum Loss Stop" and
> > > "Profit Target" settings through a formula when
> > > running SCAN it overwrites what I had set in the
> > > "Settings" dialog box. My original settings in the
> > > dialog box are not restored when exiting AA or even
> > > AB.
> > > Thankyou for a Great Program,
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> > ------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
|