|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear MLRobb,
In your interesting note there is a confusion between frequency of
light and velocity (speed) of light.
Also, it would be better to give us Mr. B. Satterfield reference.
And there is a third (interesting) point: When we say " alignment" we
must clear one thing. Lines are not the common straight lines, our
space is not Euclidean any more (since ~1910 ).
Trendlines are not always straight lines too.
Thank you for this note.
Best Regards
Dimitris Tsokakis
--- In amibroker@xxxx, MLRobb@xxxx wrote:
> A market letter is published which keeps track of planetary
> alignments; not astrology, but simply adding up orbits,
proximities,
> mass values, etc.
>
> When major adjacencies are imminent, certain effects are expected;
> the author has studied the correlation to stock index movement, and
> found enough value to offer a monthly newsletter on the investment
> applications he has detected.
>
> He says the planetary alignments have a greater effect on the
> weather, but are still useful to trading.
>
> In the meanwhile B. Satterfield, Australian astro-physicist has
> published his discovery of gravity waves; its frequency, he has
> determined, is several magnitude greater than light (about 18
> magnitudes,actually).
>
> If energy was equal to mass X frequency of C ^2 ([being a very
large
> number]and legal only for destructive purposes, we are told),
perhaps
> mass X frequency of G ^2 will have absence of energy on the other
> side of the = sign.
>
> In any case, it is interesting to think of such massive numbers,
and
> whether planetary alignments have any effect on the weather.
|