|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello MLRobb,
based on the following i submit that planetary influence on the worlds
markets does not exist. if it did i would have found it, in fact what
i found was that their could not possibly be any correlations other
than random events.
MSn> A market letter is published which keeps track of planetary
MSn> alignments; not astrology, but simply adding up orbits, proximities,
MSn> mass values, etc.
MSn> When major adjacencies are imminent, certain effects are expected;
MSn> the author has studied the correlation to stock index movement, and
MSn> found enough value to offer a monthly newsletter on the investment
MSn> applications he has detected.
I humbly submit the following argument against planetary influence
upon the earths financial markets. I can only comment upon the earths
because I have not yet been privileged enough to trade other planetary
bodies markets. In 1979 while employed by a Black Box Project I
took the liberty to use the equipment assigned to me to do some after
hours research. Unlike others that might ask you to blindly follow
my opinion. I am providing my research and calculations which prove
that the dynamics of outer space are such that it is impossible
anything here could possibly influence or have any predictive value as
far as the markets are concerned.
Below is a description of how to compute the positions for the Sun and
Moon and the major planets, as well as for comets and minor planets,
from a set of orbital elements.
The algorithms have been simplified as much as possible while still
keeping a fairly good accuracy. The accuracy of the computed positions
is a fraction of an arc minute for the Sun and the inner planets,
about one arc minute for the outer planets, and 1-2 arc minutes for
the Moon. If we limit our accuracy demands to this level, one can
simplify further by e.g. ignoring the difference between mean, true
and apparent positions.
The positions computed below are for the 'equinox of the day', which
is suitable for computing rise/set times, but not for plotting the
position on a star map drawn for a fixed epoch. In the latter case,
correction for precession must be applied, which is most simply
performed as a rotation along the ecliptic.
1. Introduction
The text below describes how to compute the positions in the sky of
the Sun, Moon and the major planets out to Neptune. The algorithm for
Pluto is taken from a fourier fit to Pluto's position as computed by
numerical integration at JPL. Positions of other celestial bodies as
well (i.e. comets and asteroids) can also be computed, if their
orbital elements are available.
These formulae may seem complicated, but I believe this is the
simplest method to compute planetary positions with the fairly good
accuracy of about one arc minute (=1/60 degree). Any further
simplifications will yield lower accuracy, but of course that may be
ok, depending on the application.
2. A few words about accuracy
The accuracy requirements are modest: a final position with an error
of no more than 1-2 arc minutes (one arc minute = 1/60 degree). This
accuracy is in one respect quite optimal: it is the highest accuracy
one can strive for, while still being able to do many simplifications.
The simplifications made here are:
1: Nutation and aberration are both ignored.
2: Planetary aberration (i.e. light travel time) is ignored.
3: The difference between Terrestial Time/Ephemeris Time (TT/ET), and
Universal Time (UT) is ignored.
4: Precession is computed in a simplified way, by a simple addition to
the ecliptic longitude.
5: Higher-order terms in the planetary orbital elements are ignored.
This will give an additional error of up to 2 arc min in 1000 years
from now. For the Moon, the error will be larger: 7 arc min 1000 years
from now. This error will grow as the square of the time from the
present.
6: Most planetary perturbations are ignored. Only the major
perturbation terms for the Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus, are
included. If still lower accuracy is acceptable, these perturbations
can be ignored as well.
7: The largest Uranus-Neptune perturbation is accounted for in the
orbital elements of these planets. Therefore, the orbital elements of
Uranus and Neptune are less accurate, especially in the distant past
and future. The elements for these planets should therefore only be
used for at most a few centuries into the past and the future.
3. The time scale
The time scale in these formulae are counted in days. Hours, minutes,
seconds are expressed as fractions of a day. Day 0.0 occurs at 2000
Jan 0.0 UT (or 1999 Dec 31, 0:00 UT). This "day number" d is computed
as follows (y=year, m=month, D=date, UT=UT in hours+decimals):
d = 367*y - 7 * ( y + (m+9)/12 ) / 4 + 275*m/9 + D - 730530
Note that ALL divisions here should be INTEGER divisions. In Pascal,
use "div" instead of "/", in MS-Basic, use "\" instead of "/". In
Fortran, C and C++ "/" can be used if both y and m are integers.
Finally, include the time of the day, by adding:
d = d + UT/24.0 (this is a floating-point division)
4. The orbital elements
The primary orbital elements are here denoted as:
N = longitude of the ascending node
i = inclination to the ecliptic (plane of the Earth's orbit)
w = argument of perihelion
a = semi-major axis, or mean distance from Sun
e = eccentricity (0=circle, 0-1=ellipse, 1=parabola)
M = mean anomaly (0 at perihelion; increases uniformly with time)
Related orbital elements are:
w1 = N + w = longitude of perihelion
L = M + w1 = mean longitude
q = a*(1-e) = perihelion distance
Q = a*(1+e) = aphelion distance
P = a ^ 1.5 = orbital period (years if a is in AU, astronomical units)
T = Epoch_of_M - (M(deg)/360_deg) / P = time of perihelion
v = true anomaly (angle between position and perihelion)
E = eccentric anomaly
One Astronomical Unit (AU) is the Earth's mean distance to the Sun, or
149.6 million km. When closest to the Sun, a planet is in perihelion,
and when most distant from the Sun it's in aphelion. For the Moon, an
artificial satellite, or any other body orbiting the Earth, one says
perigee and apogee instead, for the points in orbit least and most
distant from Earth.
To describe the position in the orbit, we use three angles: Mean
Anomaly, True Anomaly, and Eccentric Anomaly. They are all zero when
the planet is in perihelion:
Mean Anomaly (M): This angle increases uniformly over time, by 360
degrees per orbital period. It's zero at perihelion. It's easily
computed from the orbital period and the time since last perihelion.
True Anomaly (v): This is the actual angle between the planet and the
perihelion, as seen from the central body (in this case the Sun). It
increases non-uniformly with time, changing most rapidly at
perihelion.
Eccentric Anomaly (E): This is an auxiliary angle used in Kepler's
Equation, when computing the True Anomaly from the Mean Anomaly and
the orbital eccentricity.
Note that for a circular orbit (eccentricity=0), these three angles
are all equal to each other.
Another quantity we will need is ecl, the obliquity of the ecliptic,
i.e. the "tilt" of the Earth's axis of rotation (currently ca 23.4
degrees and slowly decreasing). First, compute the "d" of the moment
of interest (section 3). Then, compute the obliquity of the ecliptic:
ecl = 23.4393 - 3.563E-7 * d
Now compute the orbital elements of the planet of interest. If you
want the position of the Sun or the Moon, you only need to compute the
orbital elements for the Sun or the Moon. If you want the position of
any other planet, you must compute the orbital elements for that
planet and for the Sun (of course the orbital elements for the Sun are
really the orbital elements for the Earth; however it's customary to
here pretend that the Sun orbits the Earth). This is necessary to be
able to compute the geocentric position of the planet.
Please note that a, the semi-major axis, is given in Earth radii for
the Moon, but in Astronomical Units for the Sun and all the planets.
When computing M (and, for the Moon, when computing N and w as well),
one will quite often get a result that is larger than 360 degrees, or
negative (all angles are here computed in degrees). If negative, add
360 degrees until positive. If larger than 360 degrees, subtract 360
degrees until the value is less than 360 degrees. Note that, in most
programming languages, one must then multiply these angles with pi/180
to convert them to radians, before taking the sine or cosine of them.
Orbital elements of the Sun:
N = 0.0
i = 0.0
w = 282.9404 + 4.70935E-5 * d
a = 1.000000 (AU)
e = 0.016709 - 1.151E-9 * d
M = 356.0470 + 0.9856002585 * d
Orbital elements of the Moon:
N = 125.1228 - 0.0529538083 * d
i = 5.1454
w = 318.0634 + 0.1643573223 * d
a = 60.2666 (Earth radii)
e = 0.054900
M = 115.3654 + 13.0649929509 * d
Orbital elements of Mercury:
N = 48.3313 + 3.24587E-5 * d
i = 7.0047 + 5.00E-8 * d
w = 29.1241 + 1.01444E-5 * d
a = 0.387098 (AU)
e = 0.205635 + 5.59E-10 * d
M = 168.6562 + 4.0923344368 * d
Orbital elements of Venus:
N = 76.6799 + 2.46590E-5 * d
i = 3.3946 + 2.75E-8 * d
w = 54.8910 + 1.38374E-5 * d
a = 0.723330 (AU)
e = 0.006773 - 1.302E-9 * d
M = 48.0052 + 1.6021302244 * d
Orbital elements of Mars:
N = 49.5574 + 2.11081E-5 * d
i = 1.8497 - 1.78E-8 * d
w = 286.5016 + 2.92961E-5 * d
a = 1.523688 (AU)
e = 0.093405 + 2.516E-9 * d
M = 18.6021 + 0.5240207766 * d
Orbital elements of Jupiter:
N = 100.4542 + 2.76854E-5 * d
i = 1.3030 - 1.557E-7 * d
w = 273.8777 + 1.64505E-5 * d
a = 5.20256 (AU)
e = 0.048498 + 4.469E-9 * d
M = 19.8950 + 0.0830853001 * d
Orbital elements of Saturn:
N = 113.6634 + 2.38980E-5 * d
i = 2.4886 - 1.081E-7 * d
w = 339.3939 + 2.97661E-5 * d
a = 9.55475 (AU)
e = 0.055546 - 9.499E-9 * d
M = 316.9670 + 0.0334442282 * d
Orbital elements of Uranus:
N = 74.0005 + 1.3978E-5 * d
i = 0.7733 + 1.9E-8 * d
w = 96.6612 + 3.0565E-5 * d
a = 19.18171 - 1.55E-8 * d (AU)
e = 0.047318 + 7.45E-9 * d
M = 142.5905 + 0.011725806 * d
Orbital elements of Neptune:
N = 131.7806 + 3.0173E-5 * d
i = 1.7700 - 2.55E-7 * d
w = 272.8461 - 6.027E-6 * d
a = 30.05826 + 3.313E-8 * d (AU)
e = 0.008606 + 2.15E-9 * d
M = 260.2471 + 0.005995147 * d
Please note than the orbital elements of Uranus and Neptune as given
here are somewhat less accurate. They include a long period
perturbation between Uranus and Neptune. The period of the
perturbation is about 4200 years. Therefore, these elements should not
be expected to give results within the stated accuracy for more than a
few centuries in the past and into the future.
5. The position of the Sun
The position of the Sun is computed just like the position of any
other planet, but since the Sun always is moving in the ecliptic, and
since the eccentricity of the orbit is quite small, a few
simplifications can be made. Therefore, a separate presentation for
the Sun is given.
Of course, we're here really computing the position of the Earth in
its orbit around the Sun, but since we're viewing the sky from an
Earth-centered perspective, we'll pretend that the Sun is in orbit
around the Earth instead.
First, compute the eccentric anomaly E from the mean anomaly M and
from the eccentricity e (E and M in degrees):
E = M + e*(180/pi) * sin(M) * ( 1.0 + e * cos(M) )
or (if E and M are expressed in radians):
E = M + e * sin(M) * ( 1.0 + e * cos(M) )
Note that the formulae for computing E are not exact; however they're
accurate enough here.
Then compute the Sun's distance r and its true anomaly v from:
xv = r * cos(v) = cos(E) - e
yv = r * sin(v) = sqrt(1.0 - e*e) * sin(E)
v = atan2( yv, xv )
r = sqrt( xv*xv + yv*yv )
(note that the r computed here is later used as rs)
atan2() is a function that converts an x,y coordinate pair to the
correct angle in all four quadrants. It is available as a library
function in Fortran, C and C++. In other languages, one has to write
one's own atan2() function. It's not that difficult:
atan2( y, x ) = atan(y/x) if x positive
atan2( y, x ) = atan(y/x) +- 180 degrees if x negative
atan2( y, x ) = sign(y) * 90 degrees if x zero
See these links for some code in Basic or Pascal. Fortran and C/C++
already has atan2() as a standard library function.
Now, compute the Sun's true longitude:
lonsun = v + w
Convert lonsun,r to ecliptic rectangular geocentric coordinates xs,ys:
xs = r * cos(lonsun)
ys = r * sin(lonsun)
(since the Sun always is in the ecliptic plane, zs is of course zero).
xs,ys is the Sun's position in a coordinate system in the plane of the
ecliptic. To convert this to equatorial, rectangular, geocentric
coordinates, compute:
xe = xs
ye = ys * cos(ecl)
ze = ys * sin(ecl)
Finally, compute the Sun's Right Ascension (RA) and Declination (Dec):
RA = atan2( ye, xe )
Dec = atan2( ze, sqrt(xe*xe+ye*ye) )
6. The position of the Moon and of the planets
First, compute the eccentric anomaly, E, from M, the mean anomaly, and
e, the eccentricity. As a first approximation, do (E and M in
degrees):
E = M + e*(180/pi) * sin(M) * ( 1.0 + e * cos(M) )
or, if E and M are in radians:
E = M + e * sin(M) * ( 1.0 + e * cos(M) )
If e, the eccentricity, is less than about 0.05-0.06, this
approximation is sufficiently accurate. If the eccentricity is larger,
set E0=E and then use this iteration formula (E and M in degrees):
E1 = E0 - ( E0 - e*(180/pi) * sin(E0) - M ) / ( 1 - e * cos(E0) )
or (E and M in radians):
E1 = E0 - ( E0 - e * sin(E0) - M ) / ( 1 - e * cos(E0) )
For each new iteration, replace E0 with E1. Iterate until E0 and E1
are sufficiently close together (about 0.001 degrees). For comet
orbits with eccentricites close to one, a difference of less than 1E-4
or 1E-5 degrees should be required.
If this iteration formula won't converge, the eccentricity is probably
too close to one. Then you should instead use the formulae for
near-parabolic or parabolic orbits.
Now compute the planet's distance and true anomaly:
xv = r * cos(v) = a * ( cos(E) - e )
yv = r * sin(v) = a * ( sqrt(1.0 - e*e) * sin(E) )
v = atan2( yv, xv )
r = sqrt( xv*xv + yv*yv )
7. The position in space
Compute the planet's position in 3-dimensional space:
xh = r * ( cos(N) * cos(v+w) - sin(N) * sin(v+w) * cos(i) )
yh = r * ( sin(N) * cos(v+w) + cos(N) * sin(v+w) * cos(i) )
zh = r * ( sin(v+w) * sin(i) )
For the Moon, this is the geocentric (Earth-centered) position in the
ecliptic coordinate system. For the planets, this is the heliocentric
(Sun-centered) position, also in the ecliptic coordinate system. If
one wishes, one can compute the ecliptic longitude and latitude (this
must be done if one wishes to correct for perturbations, or if one
wants to precess the position to a standard epoch):
lonecl = atan2( yh, xh )
latecl = atan2( zh, sqrt(xh*xh+yh*yh) )
As a check one can compute sqrt(xh*xh+yh*yh+zh*zh), which of course
should equal r (except for small round-off errors).
8. Precession
If one wishes to compute the planet's position for some standard
epoch, such as 1950.0 or 2000.0 (e.g. to be able to plot the position
on a star atlas), one must add the correction below to lonecl. If a
planet's and not the Moon's position is computed, one must also add
the same correction to lonsun, the Sun's longitude. The desired Epoch
is expressed as the year, possibly with a fraction.
lon_corr = 3.82394E-5 * ( 365.2422 * ( Epoch - 2000.0 ) - d )
If one wishes the position for today's epoch (useful when computing
rising/setting times and the like), no corrections need to be done.
9. Perturbations of the Moon
If the position of the Moon is computed, and one wishes a better
accuracy than about 2 degrees, the most important perturbations has to
be taken into account. If one wishes 2 arc minute accuracy, all the
following terms should be accounted for. If less accuracy is needed,
some of the smaller terms can be omitted.
First compute:
Ms, Mm Mean Anomaly of the Sun and the Moon
Nm Longitude of the Moon's node
ws, wm Argument of perihelion for the Sun and the Moon
Ls = Ms + ws Mean Longitude of the Sun (Ns=0)
Lm = Mm + wm + Nm Mean longitude of the Moon
D = Lm - Ls Mean elongation of the Moon
F = Lm - Nm Argument of latitude for the Moon
Add these terms to the Moon's longitude (degrees):
-1.274 * sin(Mm - 2*D) (the Evection)
+0.658 * sin(2*D) (the Variation)
-0.186 * sin(Ms) (the Yearly Equation)
-0.059 * sin(2*Mm - 2*D)
-0.057 * sin(Mm - 2*D + Ms)
+0.053 * sin(Mm + 2*D)
+0.046 * sin(2*D - Ms)
+0.041 * sin(Mm - Ms)
-0.035 * sin(D) (the Parallactic Equation)
-0.031 * sin(Mm + Ms)
-0.015 * sin(2*F - 2*D)
+0.011 * sin(Mm - 4*D)
Add these terms to the Moon's latitude (degrees):
-0.173 * sin(F - 2*D)
-0.055 * sin(Mm - F - 2*D)
-0.046 * sin(Mm + F - 2*D)
+0.033 * sin(F + 2*D)
+0.017 * sin(2*Mm + F)
Add these terms to the Moon's distance (Earth radii):
-0.58 * cos(Mm - 2*D)
-0.46 * cos(2*D)
All perturbation terms that are smaller than 0.01 degrees in longitude
or latitude and smaller than 0.1 Earth radii in distance have been
omitted here. A few of the largest perturbation terms even have their
own names! The Evection (the largest perturbation) was discovered
already by Ptolemy a few thousand years ago (the Evection was one of
Ptolemy's epicycles). The Variation and the Yearly Equation were both
discovered by Tycho Brahe in the 16'th century.
The computations can be simplified by omitting the smaller
perturbation terms. The error introduced by this seldom exceeds the
sum of the amplitudes of the 4-5 largest omitted terms. If one only
computes the three largest perturbation terms in longitude and the
largest term in latitude, the error in longitude will rarley exceed
0.25 degrees, and in latitude 0.15 degrees.
10. Perturbations of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus
The only planets having perturbations larger than 0.01 degrees are
Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus. First compute:
Mj Mean anomaly of Jupiter
Ms Mean anomaly of Saturn
Mu Mean anomaly of Uranus (needed for Uranus only)
Perturbations for Jupiter. Add these terms to the longitude:
-0.332 * sin(2*Mj - 5*Ms - 67.6 degrees)
-0.056 * sin(2*Mj - 2*Ms + 21 degrees)
+0.042 * sin(3*Mj - 5*Ms + 21 degrees)
-0.036 * sin(Mj - 2*Ms)
+0.022 * cos(Mj - Ms)
+0.023 * sin(2*Mj - 3*Ms + 52 degrees)
-0.016 * sin(Mj - 5*Ms - 69 degrees)
Perturbations for Saturn. Add these terms to the longitude:
+0.812 * sin(2*Mj - 5*Ms - 67.6 degrees)
-0.229 * cos(2*Mj - 4*Ms - 2 degrees)
+0.119 * sin(Mj - 2*Ms - 3 degrees)
+0.046 * sin(2*Mj - 6*Ms - 69 degrees)
+0.014 * sin(Mj - 3*Ms + 32 degrees)
For Saturn: also add these terms to the latitude:
-0.020 * cos(2*Mj - 4*Ms - 2 degrees)
+0.018 * sin(2*Mj - 6*Ms - 49 degrees)
Perturbations for Uranus: Add these terms to the longitude:
+0.040 * sin(Ms - 2*Mu + 6 degrees)
+0.035 * sin(Ms - 3*Mu + 33 degrees)
-0.015 * sin(Mj - Mu + 20 degrees)
The "great Jupiter-Saturn term" is the largest perturbation for both
Jupiter and Saturn. Its period is 918 years, and its amplitude is
0.332 degrees for Jupiter and 0.812 degrees for Saturn. These is also
a "great Saturn-Uranus term", period 560 years, amplitude 0.035
degrees for Uranus, less than 0.01 degrees for Saturn (and therefore
omitted). The other perturbations have periods between 14 and 100
years. One should also mention the "great Uranus-Neptune term", which
has a period of 4220 years and an amplitude of about one degree. It is
not included here, instead it is included in the orbital elements of
Uranus and Neptune.
For Mercury, Venus and Mars we can ignore all perturbations. For
Neptune the only significant perturbation is already included in the
orbital elements, as mentioned above, and therefore no further
perturbation terms need to be accounted for.
11. Geocentric (Earth-centered) coordinates
Now we have computed the heliocentric (Sun-centered) coordinate of the
planet, and we have included the most important perturbations. We want
to compute the geocentric (Earth-centerd) position. We should convert
the perturbed lonecl, latecl, r to (perturbed) xh, yh, zh:
xh = r * cos(lonecl) * cos(latecl)
yh = r * sin(lonecl) * cos(latecl)
zh = r * sin(latecl)
If we are computing the Moon's position, this is already the
geocentric position, and thus we simply set xg=xh, yg=yh, zg=zh.
Otherwise we must also compute the Sun's position: convert lonsun, rs
(where rs is the r computed here) to xs, ys:
xs = rs * cos(lonsun)
ys = rs * sin(lonsun)
(Of course, any correction for precession should be added to lonecl
and lonsun before converting to xh,yh,zh and xs,ys).
Now convert from heliocentric to geocentric position:
xg = xh + xs
yg = yh + ys
zg = zh
We now have the planet's geocentric (Earth centered) position in
rectangular, ecliptic coordinates.
12. Equatorial coordinates
Let's convert our rectangular, ecliptic coordinates to rectangular,
equatorial coordinates: simply rotate the y-z-plane by ecl, the angle
of the obliquity of the ecliptic:
xe = xg
ye = yg * cos(ecl) - zg * sin(ecl)
ze = yg * sin(ecl) + zg * cos(ecl)
Finally, compute the planet's Right Ascension (RA) and Declination
(Dec):
RA = atan2( ye, xe )
Dec = atan2( ze, sqrt(xe*xe+ye*ye) )
Compute the geocentric distance:
rg = sqrt(xg*xg+yg*yg+zg*zg) = sqrt(xe*xe+ye*ye+ze*ze)
13. The Moon's topocentric position
The Moon's position, as computed earlier, is geocentric, i.e. as seen
by an imaginary observer at the center of the Earth. Real observers
dwell on the surface of the Earth, though, and they will see a
different position - the topocentric position. This position can
differ by more than one degree from the geocentric position. To
compute the topocentric positions, we must add a correction to the
geocentric position.
Let's start by computing the Moon's parallax, i.e. the apparent size
of the (equatorial) radius of the Earth, as seen from the Moon:
mpar = asin( 1/r )
where r is the Moon's distance in Earth radii. It's simplest to apply
the correction in horizontal coordinates (azimuth and altitude):
within our accuracy aim of 1-2 arc minutes, no correction need to be
applied to the azimuth. One need only apply a correction to the
altitude above the horizon:
alt_topoc = alt_geoc - mpar * cos(alt_geoc)
Sometimes one need to correct for topocentric position directly in
equatorial coordinates though, e.g. if one wants to draw on a star map
how the Moon passes in front of the Pleiades, as seen from some
specific location. Then we need to know the Moon's geocentric Right
Ascension and Declination (RA, Decl), the Local Sidereal Time (LST),
and our latitude (lat).
Our astronomical latitude (lat) must first be converted to a
geocentric latitude (gclat), and distance from the center of the Earth
(rho) in Earth equatorial radii. If we only want an approximate
topocentric position, it's simplest to pretend that the Earth is a
perfect sphere, and simply set:
gclat = lat, rho = 1.0
However, if we do wish to account for the flattening of the Earth, we
instead compute:
gclat = lat - 0.1924_deg * sin(2*lat)
rho = 0.99883 + 0.00167 * cos(2*lat)
Next we compute the Moon's geocentric Hour Angle (HA):
HA = LST - RA
where LST is our Local Sidereal Time, computed as:
LST = GMST0 + UT + LON/15
where UT is the Universal Time in hours, LON is the observer's
geographical longitude (east longitude positive, west negative). GMST0
is the Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time at 0h UT, and is most easily
computed by adding, or subtracting, 180 degrees to Ls, the Sun's mean
longitude, and then converting from degrees to hours by duvuding by
15:
GMST0 = ( Ls + 180_deg ) / 15
We also need an auxiliary angle, g:
g = atan( tan(gclat) / cos(HA) )
Now we're ready to convert the geocentric Right Ascention and
Declination (RA, Decl) to their topocentric values (topRA, topDecl):
topRA = RA - mpar * rho * cos(gclat) * sin(HA) / cos(Decl)
topDecl = Decl - mpar * rho * sin(gclat) * sin(g - Decl) / sin(g)
(Note that if decl is exactly 90 deg, cos(Decl) becomes zero and we
get a division by zero when computing topRA, but that formula breaks
down very close to the celestial poles anyway. Also if gclat is
precisely zero, g becomes zero too, and we get a division by zero when
computing topDecl. In that case, replace the formula for topDecl with
topDecl = Decl - mpar * rho * sin(-Decl) * cos(HA)
which is valid for gclat equal to zero; it can also be used for gclat
extremely close to zero).
This correction to topocentric position can also be applied to the Sun
and the planets. But since they're much farther away, the correction
becomes much smaller. It's largest for Venus at inferior conjunction,
when Venus' parallax is somewhat larger than 32 arc seconds. Within
our aim of obtaining a final accuracy of 1-2 arc minutes, it might
barely be justified to correct to topocentric position when Venus is
close to inferior conjunction, and perhaps also when Mars is at a
favourable opposition. But in all other cases this correction can
safely be ignored within our accuracy aim. We only need to worry about
the Moon in this case.
If you want to compute topocentric coordinates for the planets anyway,
you do it the same way as for the Moon, with one exception: the
parallax of the planet (ppar) is computed from this formula:
ppar = (8.794/3600)_deg / r
where r is the distance of the planet from the Earth, in astronomical
units.
14. The position of Pluto
No analytical theory has ever been constructed for the planet Pluto.
Our most accurate representation of the motion of this planet is from
numerical integrations. Yet, a "curve fit" may be performed to these
numerical integrations, and the result will be the formulae below,
valid from ca 1800 to ca 2100. Compute d, our day number, as usual
(section 3). Then compute these angles:
S = 50.03 + 0.033459652 * d
P = 238.95 + 0.003968789 * d
Next compute the heliocentric ecliptic longitude and latitude
(degrees), and distance (a.u.):
lonecl = 238.9508 + 0.00400703 * d
- 19.799 * sin(P) + 19.848 * cos(P)
+ 0.897 * sin(2*P) - 4.956 * cos(2*P)
+ 0.610 * sin(3*P) + 1.211 * cos(3*P)
- 0.341 * sin(4*P) - 0.190 * cos(4*P)
+ 0.128 * sin(5*P) - 0.034 * cos(5*P)
- 0.038 * sin(6*P) + 0.031 * cos(6*P)
+ 0.020 * sin(S-P) - 0.010 * cos(S-P)
latecl = -3.9082
- 5.453 * sin(P) - 14.975 * cos(P)
+ 3.527 * sin(2*P) + 1.673 * cos(2*P)
- 1.051 * sin(3*P) + 0.328 * cos(3*P)
+ 0.179 * sin(4*P) - 0.292 * cos(4*P)
+ 0.019 * sin(5*P) + 0.100 * cos(5*P)
- 0.031 * sin(6*P) - 0.026 * cos(6*P)
+ 0.011 * cos(S-P)
r = 40.72
+ 6.68 * sin(P) + 6.90 * cos(P)
- 1.18 * sin(2*P) - 0.03 * cos(2*P)
+ 0.15 * sin(3*P) - 0.14 * cos(3*P)
Now we know the heliocentric distance and ecliptic longitude/latitude
for Pluto. To convert to geocentric coordinates, do as for the other
planets.
15. The elongation and physical ephemerides of the planets
When we finally have completed our computation of the heliocentric and
geocentric coordinates of the planets, it could also be interesting to
know what the planet will look like. How large will it appear? What's
its phase and magnitude (brightness)? These computations are much
simpler than the computations of the positions.
Let's start by computing the apparent diameter of the planet:
d = d0 / R
R is the planet's geocentric distance in astronomical units, and d is
the planet's apparent diameter at a distance of 1 astronomical unit.
d0 is of course different for each planet. The values below are given
in seconds of arc. Some planets have different equatorial and polar
diameters:
Mercury 6.74"
Venus 16.92"
Earth 17.59" equ 17.53" pol
Mars 9.36" equ 9.28" pol
Jupiter 196.94" equ 185.08" pol
Saturn 165.6" equ 150.8" pol
Uranus 65.8" equ 62.1" pol
Neptune 62.2" equ 60.9" pol
The Sun's apparent diameter at 1 astronomical unit is 1919.26". The
Moon's apparent diameter is:
d = 1873.7" * 60 / r
where r is the Moon's distance in Earth radii.
Two other quantities we'd like to know are the phase angle and the
elongation.
The phase angle tells us the phase: if it's zero the planet appears
"full", if it's 90 degrees it appears "half", and if it's 180 degrees
it appears "new". Only the Moon and the inferior planets (i.e. Mercury
and Venus) can have phase angles exceeding about 50 degrees.
The elongation is the apparent angular distance of the planet from the
Sun. If the elongation is smaller than ca 20 degrees, the planet is
hard to observe, and if it's smaller than ca 10 degrees it's usually
not possible to observe the planet.
To compute phase angle and elongation we need to know the planet's
heliocentric distance, r, its geocentric distance, R, and the distance
to the Sun, s. Now we can compute the phase angle, FV, and the
elongation, elong:
elong = acos( ( s*s + R*R - r*r ) / (2*s*R) )
FV = acos( ( r*r + R*R - s*s ) / (2*r*R) )
When we know the phase angle, we can easily compute the phase:
phase = ( 1 + cos(FV) ) / 2 = hav(180_deg - FV)
hav(FV) is the "haversine" of the phase angle. The "haversine" (or
"half versine") is an old and now obsolete trigonometric function;
it's defined as:
hav(x) = ( 1 - cos(x) ) / 2 = sin^2 (x/2)
As usual we must use a different procedure for the Moon. Since the
Moon is so close to the Earth, the procedure above would introduce too
big errors. Instead we use the Moon's ecliptic longitude and latitude,
mlon and mlat, and the Sun's ecliptic longitude, mlon, to compute
first the elongation, then the phase angle, of the Moon:
elong = acos( cos(slon - mlon) * cos(mlat) )
FV = 180_deg - elong
Finally we'll compute the magnitude (or brightness) of the planets.
Here we need to use a formula that's different for each planet. FV is
the phase angle (in degrees), r is the heliocentric and R the
geocentric distance (both in AU):
Mercury: -0.36 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.027 * FV + 2.2E-13 * FV**6
Venus: -4.34 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.013 * FV + 4.2E-7 * FV**3
Mars: -1.51 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.016 * FV
Jupiter: -9.25 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.014 * FV
Saturn: -9.0 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.044 * FV + ring_magn
Uranus: -7.15 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.001 * FV
Neptune: -6.90 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.001 * FV
Moon: +0.23 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.026 * FV + 4.0E-9 * FV**4
** is the power operator, thus FV**6 is the phase angle (in degrees)
raised to the sixth power. If FV is 150 degrees then FV**6 becomes ca
1.14E+13, which is a quite large number.
For the Moon, we also need the heliocentric distance, r, and
geocentric distance, R, in AU (astronomical units). Here r can be set
equal to the Sun's geocentric distance in AU. The Moon's geocentric
distance, R, previously computed i Earth radii, must be converted to
AU's - we do this by multiplying by sin(17.59"/2) = 1/23450. Or we
could modify the magnitude formula for the Moon so it uses r in AU's
and R in Earth radii:
Moon: -21.62 + 5*log10(r*R) + 0.026 * FV + 4.0E-9 * FV**4
Saturn needs special treatment due to its rings: when Saturn's rings
are "open" then Saturn will appear much brighter than when we view
Saturn's rings edgewise. We'll compute ring_mang like this:
ring_magn = -2.6 * sin(abs(B)) + 1.2 * (sin(B))**2
Here B is the tilt of Saturn's rings which we also need to compute.
Then we start with Saturn's geocentric ecliptic longitude and latitude
(los, las) which we've already computed. We also need the tilt of the
rings to the ecliptic, ir, and the "ascending node" of the plane of
the rings, Nr:
ir = 28.06_deg
Nr = 169.51_deg + 3.82E-5_deg * d
Here d is our "day number" which we've used so many times before. Now
let's compute the tilt of the rings:
B = asin( sin(las) * cos(ir) - cos(las) * sin(ir) * sin(los-Nr) )
This concludes our computation of the magnitudes of the planets.
16. Positions of asteroids
For asteroids, the orbital elements are often given as: N,i,w,a,e,M,
where N,i,w are valid for a specific epoch (nowadays usually 2000.0).
In our simplified computational scheme, the only significant changes
with the epoch occurs in N. To convert N_Epoch to the N (today's
epoch) we want to use, simply add a correction for precession:
N = N_Epoch + 0.013967 * ( 2000.0 - Epoch ) + 3.82394E-5 * d
where Epoch is expressed as a year with fractions, e.g. 1950.0 or
2000.0
Most often M, the mean anomaly, is given for another day than the day
we want to compute the asteroid's position for. If the daily motion,
n, is given, simply add n * (time difference in days) to M. If n is
not given, but the period P (in days) is given, then n = 360.0/P. If P
is not given, it can be computed from:
P = 365.2568984 * a**1.5 (days) = 1.00004024 * a**1.5 (years)
** is the power-of operator. a**1.5 is the same as sqrt(a*a*a).
When all orbital elements has been computed, proceed as with the other
planets (section 6).
17. Position of comets.
For comets having elliptical orbits, M is usually not given. Instead
T, the time of perihelion, is given. At perihelion M is zero. To
compute M for any other moment, first compute the "day number" d of T
(section 3), let's call this dT. Then compute the "day number" d of
the moment for which you want to compute a position, let's call this
d. Then M, the mean anomaly, is computed like:
M = 360.0 * (d-dT)/P (degrees)
where P is given in days, and d-dT of course is the time since last
perihelion, also in days.
Also, a, the semi-major axis, is usually not given. Instead q, the
perihelion distance, is given. a can easily be computed from q and e:
a = q / (1.0 - e)
Then proceed as with an asteroid (section 16).
18. Parabolic orbits
If the comet has a parabolic orbit, a different method has to be used.
Then the orbital period of the comet is infinite, and M (the mean
anomaly) is always zero. The eccentricity, e, is always exactly 1.
Since the semi-major axis, a, is infinite, we must instead directly
use the perihelion distance, q. To compute a parabolic orbit, we
proceed like this:
Compute the "day number", d, for T, the moment of perihelion, call
this dT. Compute d for the moment we want to compute a position, call
it d (section 3). The constant k is the Gaussian gravitational
constant: k = 0.01720209895 exactly!
Then compute:
H = (d-dT) * (k/sqrt(2)) / q**1.5
where q**1.5 is the same as sqrt(q*q*q). Also compute:
h = 1.5 * H
g = sqrt( 1.0 + h*h )
s = cbrt( g + h ) - cbrt( g - h )
cbrt() is the cube root function: cbrt(x) = x**(1.0/3.0). The formulae
has been devised so that both g+h and g-h always are positive.
Therefore one can here safely compute cbrt(x) as exp(log(x)/3.0) . In
general, cbrt(-x) = -cbrt(x) and of course cbrt(0) = 0.
Instead of trying to compute some eccentric anomaly, we compute the
true anomaly and the heliocentric distance directly:
v = 2.0 * atan(s)
r = q * ( 1.0 + s*s )
When we know the true anomaly and the heliocentric distance, we can
proceed by computing the position in space (section 7).
19. Near-parabolic orbits.
The most common case for a newly discovered comet is that the orbit
isn't an exact parabola, but very nearly so. It's eccentricity is
slightly below, or slightly above, one. The algorithm presented here
can be used for eccentricities between about 0.98 and 1.02. If the
eccentricity is smaller than 0.98 the elliptic algorithm (Kepler's
equation/etc) should be used instead. No known comet has an
eccentricity exceeding 1.02.
As for the purely parabolic orbit, we start by computing the time
since perihelion in days, d-dT, and the perihelion distance, q. We
also need to know the eccentricity, e. The constant k is the Gaussian
gravitational constant: k = 0.01720209895 exactly!
Then we can proceed as:
a = 0.75 * (d-dT) * k * sqrt( (1 + e) / (q*q*q) )
b = sqrt( 1 + a*a )
W = cbrt(b + a) - cbrt(b - a)
c = 1 + 1/(W*W)
f = (1 - e) / (1 + e)
g = f / (c*c)
a1 = (2/3) + (2/5) * W*W
a2 = (7/5) + (33/35) * W*W + (37/175) * W**4
a3 = W*W * ( 432/175) + (956/1125) * W*W + (84/1575) * W**4 )
w = W * ( 1 + g * c * ( a1 + a2*g + a3*g*g ) )
v = 2 * atan(w)
r = q * ( 1 + w*w ) / ( 1 + w*w * f )
This algorithm yields the true anomaly, v, and the heliocentric
distance, r, for a nearly-parabolic orbit. Note that this algorithm
will fail very far from the perihelion; however the accuracy is
sufficient for all comets closer than Pluto.
20. Rise and set times.
(this subject has received a document of its own)
21. Validity of orbital elements.
Due to perturbations from mainly the giant planets, like Jupiter and
Saturn, the orbital elements of celestial bodies are constantly
changing. The orbital elements for the Sun, Moon and the major
planets, as given here, are valid for a long time period. However,
orbital elements given for a comet or an asteroid are valid only for a
limited time. How long they are valid is hard to say generally. It
depends on many factors, such as the accuracy you need, and the
magnitude of the perturbations the comet or asteroid is subjected to
from, say, Jupiter. A comet might travel in roughly the same orbit
several orbital periods, experiencing only slight perturbations, but
suddenly it might pass very close to Jupiter and get its orbit changed
drastically. To compute this in a reliable way is quite complicated
and completely out of scope for this description. As a rule of thumb,
though, one can assume that an asteroid, if one uses the orbital
elements for a specific epoch, one or a few revolutions away from that
moment will have an error in its computed position of at least one or
a few arc minutes, and possibly more. The errors will accumulate with
time.
PS I especially hope you paid attention to the Mars calculations.
--
Best regards,
List mailto:list@x...
|