|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thank you DT for pointing out the difference between rate of travel
and rate of vibration,or oscillation.
The Setterfield papers are here: http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/
--- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:
> Dear MLRobb,
> In your interesting note there is a confusion between frequency of
> light and velocity (speed) of light.
> Also, it would be better to give us Mr. B. Satterfield reference.
> And there is a third (interesting) point: When we say " alignment"
we
> must clear one thing. Lines are not the common straight lines, our
> space is not Euclidean any more (since ~1910 ).
> Trendlines are not always straight lines too.
> Thank you for this note.
> Best Regards
> Dimitris Tsokakis
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, MLRobb@xxxx wrote:
> > A market letter is published which keeps track of planetary
> > alignments; not astrology, but simply adding up orbits,
> proximities,
> > mass values, etc.
> >
> > When major adjacencies are imminent, certain effects are
expected;
> > the author has studied the correlation to stock index movement,
and
> > found enough value to offer a monthly newsletter on the
investment
> > applications he has detected.
> >
> > He says the planetary alignments have a greater effect on the
> > weather, but are still useful to trading.
> >
> > In the meanwhile B. Satterfield, Australian astro-physicist has
> > published his discovery of gravity waves; its frequency, he has
> > determined, is several magnitude greater than light (about 18
> > magnitudes,actually).
> >
> > If energy was equal to mass X frequency of C ^2 ([being a very
> large
> > number]and legal only for destructive purposes, we are told),
> perhaps
> > mass X frequency of G ^2 will have absence of energy on the other
> > side of the = sign.
> >
> > In any case, it is interesting to think of such massive numbers,
> and
> > whether planetary alignments have any effect on the weather.
|