|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Trader:
A suggestion. Since you are familiar with
programming in MS, why not program what you want in MS and then
convert. Very easy to do with documentation that is equivalent to what
Equis gives you with MS. If you have a problem converting from MS, you
could post your program and other will help you convert to AFL. Then you
can move from single stock testing to portfolio testing without any
problem. If you cannot do it in MS with a single stock, at this pointyou
will probably not be any happier with AB. Accepting this reality would be
a constructive step forward, permitting you to move on to the programs thatare
still useful to you until Tomasz develops AB to the point that you can do what
you want.
Good Trading.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
<DIV
>From:
<A title=traders10@xxxx
href="">traders10@xxxx
To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxx
href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 6:11
PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Dear
Trader
--- In amibroker@xxxx..., <A
href="">box25@xxxx... wrote:
(snip)
I have no complaints about AB in general, its value vs cost, or the
excellent support provided by Tomasz. However, I have not switched
from TS, MS, SC, TAS, AIQ or Investigator to AB.AB has one
feature, the ability to back test a portfolio of securities, which I am
trying to use to evaluate trading system ideas.
(snip)
What programming I do
is application oriented primarily in MS or TS easy language. What is
familiar and comfortable there is rather different in many ways from TJ's
vision of what he would like AB to be. Those differences make it
difficult for me to move ahead with my project from time to
time.(snip)
|