|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Peter,
> I've checked on my PC and Fortran compiled
> programs run at least 2 -3 x faster than C etc
It really depends on the quality of the compiler. A decent C optimizing compiler
can generate the code that runs exactly the same speed as a Fortran code.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
===============
AmiBroker - the comprehensive share manager.
http://www.amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "server not recognized" <winchp@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Event Date
> Yeah we all did fortran a LONG time ago. Its upto Fortran 95 now after
> Fortran 66, 77, 90, so 2000 must be close by.
>
> Its still the language of choice in physics and aerospace when high
> computational speed is needed. I've checked on my PC and Fortran compiled
> programs run at least 2 -3 x faster than C etc. BTW did you know that at
> the core of MATLAB is fortran computation.
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barry Holt" <bholt@xxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 12:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Event Date
>
>
> > Tomasz,
> >
> > Thank you for the programming tips. These examples you have been
> providing,
> > once I understand them fully, will make it invaluable for further
> > programming.
> >
> > I used to do Fortran programming a LONG time ago, but AFL is very
> different,
> > especially the concept of arrays for most variables.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
|