| 
 PureBytes Links 
Trading Reference Links 
 | 
| 
 As I read this the window is from 2/3 to 3/13 - is 
that correct? 
Jim 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:45 
  AM 
  Subject: RE: [RT] RE: Charles 
Nenner 
  
  
  
  
   Jim, how long does the Puetz crash window remain open? I am also 
  looking at the 11th as a low. 
  
    
    
    I always 
    lose track of full moons.  However, we remain in a ?Puetz? crash window 
    (crashes never occur outside a Puetz window, but do not always occur during 
    a Putetz window-see Peter Eliades work and Chris Carolan?s work).  A 
    severe downturn, however brief, is still possible. 
    My 
    preferred reading of EW (ala Hochberg/Prechter), McHugh?s phi dates, 
    and Armstrong?s PEI has a w2 of w5 of w1 (Hochberg/Prechter?s current count) 
    completing imminently at current levels or slightly higher, thereafter, with 
    3 waves down to test Nov ?08 lows and maybe even 2002 lows.  To get to 
    Armstrong?s ?reactionary high? in March 2009 there would then need to be a 
    powerful V bottom and rally (see Armstrong?s ?It?s Just Time? dated 
    10/8/08).  Just trying to put pieces together.   
    If you want 
    to get a feel for how Nenner synthesizes his forecasts, the following 2007 
    video is a pretty exhaustive video on his methods.  It?s not a pure 
    methodology.  It includes EW, cycles, Fibs, solar sunspot 
    cycles?..  Its apparently his methodology doesn?t say ?This is the day? 
    or ?This is the price.?  Rather, we?re very close in 
    TIME. 
    http://charlesnenner.com/inthenews-2007-07-12embedded.html 
     
    
    
    From: realtraders@yahoogroups.com 
    [mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
    Ketayun Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:45 
    AM To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com Subject: 
    RE: [RT] RE: Charles Nenner   
     
    
    
    
    
    Wow Jim! I just read 
    through all the clips.   
    
    
    The week of the 9th is 13 
    weeks from the Nov low with the 5th pointing to a CIT (thinking high of the 
    week).  
    
    
    The 9th should be bullish 
    (Full Moon in Leo) but possibly the low will be another day. Haytham's 
    statistic plays out often, Friday down= Monday and at least one other day 
    down in the following week. Down can be LL and up too. Maybe Feb 
    11th?  
    
     [>>]  -----Original Message----- From: 
    realtraders@yahoogroups.com 
    [mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jim 
    Ross Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:31 AM To: 
    realtraders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [RT] RE: 
    Charles Nenner
  
    
      
      Saw the 
      interview.  Loved the comment ?I?m never wrong.?  I admit, he is 
      amazing.  BUT, I saw him in March 2008 on CNBC when he declared the 
      low was likely in for the year.  OOPS.  I?ve spent this morning 
      since then catching up on the videos that are on the net for Nenner.  
      He combines EW, cycles, solarspot cycles, Fibs and tons of price 
      observations going back several hundred years and creates cycles that 
      point to turning points.  EXCEPT for the bad 2008 call, which I can?t 
      find a video for it (not surprised), he?s pretty accurate in terms of 
      time.  And on this one, I agree with an exception.  I think the 
      buy is going to be a lot lower even though its only days away.  
       
       
      He did 
      say on CNBC this morning, the low and the buy point is any day now.  
       
       
      
      
      From: realtraders@yahoogroups.com 
      [mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
      Ketayun Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:40 
      AM To: Realtraders Subject: [RT] RE: Charles 
      Nenner   
       
      
      
      
      
      Just saw him on CNBC and 
      researched him too. He is calling for a bottom (within a few days) until 
      Mid March. He seemed disinclined to point to date or price but apparently 
      is well able to do that. Anybody got a clue about his forecasts?  
        
      
        
        
        
               
    
     
    
 
    
 
__._,_.___
     
    
 
      
   
__,_._,___
 |   
 |