|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Here's to the good ole trading days and RT was part of
that experience.
I'm taking it a little easier now. These post are right
on.
Chas
-----
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:26:56 EDT
delta88343@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>
> Jeff,
>
> I think (know) you're right.
>
> I have been on this list for probably 13+ years and I
>remember the days when
> members would regularly post their ideas and thoughts
>with charts.
>
> Most of the problem I believe, as we have seen for a
>while, is that
> individual's posts get heavily criticized when they do
>not include a component of
> analysis that someone else is seeking or if someone does
>not agree with their
> thinking and opinion. If they are asked to explain
>something, it should be done
> in a professional fashion. Not from an obvious position
>to knock someone or
> their work or ask them to prove what they are saying.
>
> This is a forum for an exchange of ideas...right or
>wrong, whether one
> agrees or disagrees with their assessment of an issue.
>
> We all have the right of choice to open someone's post
>to the list or not.
>
> This bantering about posts containing links to an
>individuals site has gone
> way beyond the realm of normalcy.
>
> Quite frankly, I do not know where we are on that issue.
>Most posts that
> seem argumentative I just delete. I do not care if
>someone includes a link to a
> site they have, as long as they are not openly selling
>their wares in their
> emails. Let them sell their wares via the accuracy of
>their projections. If
> individuals then choose to visit that site or contact
>that individual privately
> so be it. This is America...our foundation is build upon
> commerce.
>
> In my opinion, individuals that get arrogant, or their
>posts become negative
> and start knocking someone else's work or opinion should
>be immediately
> banned for a specific period of time after a private
>warning. If the poor conduct
> persists then a longer ban should be implemented and
>then ultimately a
> permanent ban should be warranted if the negative
> behavior does not self correct.
>
> I believe the above is a root cause of lack of
>participation on the list.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> So those that use to post more, please continue to do
>so-so the list can get
> back to where it use to be which was an interesting
>exchange of ideas,
> methodologies (except where proprietary of course) and
>projections...right or
> wrong. That's not the issue...communication is.
>
> Lee
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/21/2008 12:18:45 A.M. Eastern
>Daylight Time,
> jharteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Steve:
> I’m sure your question to I’m has also been in the
>minds of many who have
> been around long enough to recall what Realtraders was
>like more than 10 years
> ago. Of course your name still rings a ‘clear’ bell to
>me. I have made
> attempts to put on gifs on several very different topics
>from a technical
> standpoint; but there isn’t even one response out of
>what I have presented. I can
> accept the fact that my trading ‘ideas’ could be totally
>wrong or worthless
> to anyone; but when there wasn’t even one negative
>and/or constructive
> criticisms out of posts; there is something amiss on
>this list. These topics are
> not anything ‘new’ to anyone; such as pattern
> recognitions, harmonics
> patterns, 1-2-3, Ross Hooks, Slings, Woodie’s CCI…etc.
> I guess, people are just not
> in the ‘mood’ of interacting trading ideas anymore.
> Take care.
> Have a good one
> Jeff Harteam
>
>
> ____________________________________
>
>From: <ST1>re <ST1>re [mailto: [mailto [mailto ]
>On Behalf Of Steve
> Karnish
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 11:19 AM
> To: <ST1>re <ST1>re
> Subject: Re: [RT] A Re: Centered Moving Average
>Approach vs. Standard
> Error Band
> Clyde,
> I receive many of the same low risk entries by using a
>55-period standard
> error band (see attachment). The only reason I've
> lurked the forum for the
> last three or four years, after being an active
>contributor for five or six
> years, is to be able to see what the "swing machine" is
> predicting.
> Tell me Tell : what became of the fine forum that once
>existed under this
> name? I reviewed a few weeks of real traders' postings
>from over five years
> ago and was surprised at the quality of posts and
>thoughtful responses most
> received. At one time this forum was a great place to
>bounce around technical
> ideas. Do any great technical forums still exists?
> Realtraders has become
> an opinionated, negative gathering place. Where's a po
>boy to go to exchange
> trading ideas?
> Take care,
>
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.Che
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.3/1563 -
>Release Date: 7/20/2008
> 12:59 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Get fantasy football with free live
>scoring. Sign up for
>FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
> (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:realtraders-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:realtraders-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|