I would appreciate if Tim, Ira, Jim and the others here could
shed
some light on the Fed's liquidity auctions -- most recently
$30
billion in funds at below-market interest rates.
It sounds
like the Fed's traditional open market operations are not
working like
they used to to add liquidity. The latest chart of M3
I've seen seems to
show the year-over-year percentage change in money
supply peaked in late
2007 and turning down slightly.
The more the people in power tell us
that the credit markets are fine
and the crisis is abating, the more
concerned I get.
From: Timothy Morge <timothymorge@sbcglobal.net>
To:
realtraders@yahoogroups.com
Date:
Thursday, January 3, 2008, 2:01:11 PM
Subject: [RT] Inflation
My
point here would be that the self proclaimed
savior, Greenspan, realized
some time ago that real
inflation was driven by the expansion of the
broadest
measure of the money supply [m3] and so he
conveniently had
the Fed officially stop publishing
the aggregate M3 numbers. Why? Because
then when the
'massaged' inflation numbers [You would die laughing
if
you saw exactly how the BLS and Treasury officials
actually 'seasonally
adjust' these and all economic
numbers, by the way] come out, they would
no longer
have to explain how M3 could be growing at 8 pct and
their
'officially massaged' CPI number showed 2 pct
inflation.
But never
fear! By law, regional Federal Reserve Banks
MUST report transactions,
money supply growth by all
measures and several other very useful
statistics. So
if you actually take the time to visit ALL the
regional
Federal Reserve Bank web sites one by one,
record the actual M3 numbers
monthly and then do the
simple math, you too can have the real money
supply
number and will have a very good feeling for what
domestic
inflation really is and what is likely to be
6-18 months from
now.
I do not buy the 'domestic inflation' has been
lowered
because of globalization and productivity. I am a
pure
monetarist and in my opinion, price is all that
matters. If M3 is
growing at 17 pct, I don't care
about those explanations--they are
fluff
mis-information excuses put out by the Fed and the
Treasury to
help explain their massaged numbers.
But as I said in an earlier
post, this MY opinion. NO
ONE should take anything I say as the
'truth.'
Instead, look at all of these statements made by
everyone,
especially the government and then do your
own reading and research. Then
make your own decision
about what makes sense and what seems like
hooey.
I can tell you...I have a wife and a 7 year old and a
9
year old and our grocery bills have more than
doubled in 2 1/2 years
where I live. And we do not
live an lavish lifestyle. And gas went from
$1.25 to
$3.00 on a good. And My insurance costs have nearly
doubled
over the past 3 years. To me, productivity and
globalization don't change
the fact that these numbers
look like I am facing 20+ pct inflation on an
annual
basis already. And just wait until our current Fed
Chairman
starts raising rates...
Tim
Morge
www.marketgeometry.com
--- Jim White <jwhite43@xxxxxxxxxnet>
wrote:
> Years ago, after the rapid rise in inflation and
>
interest rates put my development company out of
> business, I
developed an equation to forecast
> interest rates based on the rate
of increase in
> money supply and the rate of increase in GNP.
>
I will have to review the formula but I believe it
> was
>
Inflation rate = Rate of money supply growth - (rate
> of GNP growth +
3%). The effects of surplus money
> supply are felt as price increases
with a lag of
> about 6 months.
> Today's conditions are
somewhat different due to the
> globalization of business and the
rapid rise in
> productivity due to technology and have resulted
in
> a slowing of domestic inflation. Never the less, I
>
believe there will be a reckoning and a return to
> more sustainable
conditions but this time it will be
> world wide.
> Jim
White
> Pivot Research & Trading Co.
>
PivotTrader.com