[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Whopping Premiums, was : RE: [RT] Re: Fedback-This Week's Most Unusual Covered Call



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




The attached chart shows that implied volatility of 
the OEX which usually tracks 30 day historic volatility has increases 
substantially in the last few weeks.
 
Good luck and god trading,
 
Ray Raffurty
 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  M. 
  Simms 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:56 
  AM
  Subject: Whopping Premiums, was : RE: 
  [RT] Re: Fedback-This Week's Most Unusual Covered Call
  
  Speaking of 
  options, has anyone taken a gander at the whopping premiums of index options 
  like the OEX in the current expiration Month ?
  Holy 
  moly....lots of opportunities here in shorting premium if the angst is near 
  it's max.
  2 weeks ago, 
  long puts was a great position, but RIGHT NOW I can't see going long 
  <any> options at this juncture, can you ?
  <FONT color=#0000ff 
  size=2> 
  <FONT color=#0000ff 
  size=2> 
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  >
    <FONT face=Tahoma 
    size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Ray Raffurty 
    [mailto:r.raffurty@xxxxxxxx]Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 6:00 
    PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; John CappelloCc: 
    MedianLine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] Re: Fedback-This 
    Week's Most Unusual Covered Call
    Correction:  The <FONT face="Courier New" 
    size=3>cash in lieu of 0.30422 share of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. 
    Class A ("TAP.A") Common Stock; plus cash in lieu of 0.84326 share of 
    Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Class B will be a lot more than what I 
    said since TAP.A is at is at $14.40 and B is at 14.44.  Sorry, but it 
    will be around $16.20 per contract.
    <FONT face="Courier New" 
    size=3> 
    Good luck and 
    good trading
    <FONT face="Courier New" 
    size=3> 
    Ray 
    Raffurty
    
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    >
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      <DIV 
      >From: 
      Ray 
      Raffurty 
      To: <A title=jvc689@xxxxxxx 
      href="">John Cappello ; <A 
      title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      
      Cc: <A 
      title=MedianLine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="">MedianLine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      
      Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:40 
      PM
      Subject: [RT] Re: Fedback-This Week's 
      Most Unusual Covered Call
      Hi John,If you purchased 100 shares of C and 
      sold 1CLTCC call your are NOTcompletely covered.  In August of 
      2002 Citigroup spun off it's TravelersInsurance division <A 
      href="">http://www.citi.com/citigroup/press/020820a.htm 
      anddistributed the Traveler shares to owners of Citigroup stock in the 
      ratiodescribed at<A 
      href="">http://www.cboe.com/common/pageviewer.asp?file=02-454.doc&dir=ttstocksm&head=stock%20splits%20%26%20mergers&sec=5Since 
      options, including the March 15 CCC calls, where trading at the 
      timethose contracts had to be adjusted to include the shares 
      distributed and theoption symbols where changed to as the LT thus 
      CLTCC is a nonconformingoption.  At the time of the distribution 
      a new series was created foroptions sold after that date without the 
      LT symbol to indicate 100 shares ofCitigroup only.  In other 
      words if you owned 100 shares of C in early August2002 and sold (1) 15 
      CCC call you would be required to deliver both the 100Citigroup shares 
      PLUS the shares of Travelers you received, if exercised,and the symbol 
      was changer to CLTCC.  After the distribution date if 
      youpurchased 100 shares of C and sold 1 CCC 15 call you would be 
      covered.  Asfar as I know the unusual option symbol is always the 
      nonconforming one.If you look at the attached chart you will see 
      that in every case the optionwith the LT designation is trading at a 
      higher bid and ask for the samestrike than the option without the 
      LT.  This occurs because the value of theoptions are determined 
      by adding the value of the various Travelers sharesto the 100 
      Citigroup shares.I don't what Smith Barney told you but CLTCC is a 
      15 strike, it's just formore than 100 shares (nonconforming).  If 
      you go to the OptionXpress website and go to the calls only option 
      chain you can check a box to show thenonconforming options.  If 
      the box is checked the LT series shows and if itis not checked they 
      don't show.I believe the quote you got over the week end on CCC 
      was erroneous.  Theremay not even be a market in that option 
      currently (in is no longer showingup).  It is possible that the 
      data from which the various option chains arecreated had defaulted to 
      an old quote when it found no new prices.  Also,when you use a 
      website to search for option yielding a high % on coveredcalls you 
      must be very careful.  They often do not screen out 
      nonconformingoptions but calculate the % gain based on 100 
      shares!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Ihave been burned this way and learned 
      to check the CBOE's web site whensomething looks to good.If 
      you entered an order to sell CCC, I would question why your 
      brokersubstituted the nonconforming CLTCC and demand it be 
      undone.  He should haverejected the order or given you the price 
      on CCC.  If, however, you enteredthe order to sell CLTCC you need 
      to either close the trade before expirationor plan to purchase the 
      various Traveler's shares required to be covered(more 
      commissions).  In this case, perhaps your kindly old broker will 
      undothe trade..., NOT.  You can always do nothing, but you will 
      be shortTravelers on 2/24/03 after the options are exercised.  
      You can then buy toclose the short, but the market has a way of moving 
      to make this the worstpossible outcome, not to mention additional 
      commissions.The short will be:   4 shares of Travelers 
      Property Casualty Corp. Class A("TAP.A") Common Stock; plus 8 shares 
      of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Class B ("TAP.B") Common Stock; 
      plus cash in lieu of 0.30422 share ofTravelers Property Casualty Corp. 
      Class A ("TAP.A") Common Stock; plus cashin lieu of 0.84326 share of 
      Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Class B("TAP.B") Common 
      Stock.Also notice that there are 2 "cash in lieu of" 
      components.  This means youwill need to pay out that cash to the 
      option holder ($1.15 per contract).This cash is probably to adjust for 
      fractional shares that wheredistributed, but which could not be 
      accounted for otherwise.I think the odds are against you on this 
      and you will be lucky if you onlytake a small loss.  
      Unfortunately the market does not hand out money thisway.  
      Occasional there will be small discrepancies in option price to 
      stockprice, pennies or less.  Then professionals will move 
      quickly on volume andlow commissions to close the 
      discrepancy.Good luck and good trading,Ray 
      Raffurty----- Original Message -----From: "John Cappello" 
      <jvc689@xxxxxxx>To: "Ray Raffurty" <r.raffurty@xxxxxxxx>; 
      <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Cc: 
      <MedianLine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:07 
      PMSubject: Fedback-This Week's Most Unusual Covered 
      Call> Dear Ray,>> I just did a double check 
      with Smith Barney and the correct symbol> for the $15 strike price 
      is CLTCC.... which is what I sold. Options> Express also confirms 
      this. The other designations just further> describe the Travelers 
      acquisition from last year...and have nothing> to do with pricing 
      other than history.>> When I first looked at this trade, the 
      $17.50 strike price was in the> profit mode to sell the call and 
      buy the stock...that is now close to> parity.>> Hope 
      this helps.>> Sincerely,>> 
      John>>>>> ------------------ Reply 
      Separator --------------------> Originally From: "Ray Raffurty" 
      <r.raffurty@xxxxxxxx>> Subject: Re: [RT] This Week's Most 
      Unusual Covered Call> Date: 03/08/2003 
      06:54am>>> 
      [Attachment]>To unsubscribe from this group, 
      send an email 
      to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
      use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
      href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
    To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Attachment:
OEX.gif

Attachment: Description: "Description: GIF image"