[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] File Type/Size Does matter!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

> PNG is good. Just note that older browsers (IE 4, as I recall) had 
probs (didn't display) PNG files,...

yea fwiw, I've got an older "high end" image editor that will not 
read PNG's, that's why I still use GIFs even though my browser reads 
PNGs.

BW


--- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gary Funck" <gary@xxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ernie Bonugli [mailto:ebonugli@x...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:14 AM
> > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [RT] File Type/Size Does matter!
> > The attached file is a PNG file.
> >
> > Here's a quick test on size and why I use PNG:
> >
> > png  -  15kb
> > gif  -  18kb
> > bmp -  155kb
> > jpeg - 338kb
> >
> > I  was  a  little surprised the the the jpeg was the worst one in
> > this test.
> 
> PNG is good. Just note that older browsers (IE 4, as I recall) had 
probs
> (didn't display) PNG files, so there may be interoperability 
problems with old
> software. These days though, PNG files are frequently used on the 
net, so it
> may not be a problem.
> 
> JPG is generally better for photos/pictures than 
graphics/tables/charts,
> because it interpolates the image, which caan create shadowing and 
fuzziness
> when the chart is enlarged.
> 
> I think the large JPG above might've been due to the resolution and 
number of
> colors you chose.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/