|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Anyone have been in contact with David Jennings?
I have send few e mails with no answer?
thanks in advance
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Harper" <_sharper@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gannsghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [gannsghost] Re: Studying Gann
> to all,
>
> There will always be doubters to various methods. It
> has been said that Gann was about 85% correct in his
> predictions - why wasn't he 100% correct. Nobody is
> perfect, or any system, but we can try to get as close
> as we can. Why aren't Elliott Waves correctly
> measured? The debate on these can go on and on. The
> key, I believe, is to go back in time and research the
> various cycles. That's why Gann went back a few
> hundred years researching some cycles. Since the
> orbit of the planets are in a fixed pattern, then the
> cycles should be recurring over time, and a
> significant amount of data will show this without
> astrology. Without astrology though, it will not give
> the cause, just the effect. Gann made several
> predictions in his annual forecast also, such as
> hurricanes, earthquakes, and the political climate.
> These passages alone can be from astrology because
> they didn't have the computers, unless you say that
> astrology is a time computer, to forecast events. The
> weater report on television isn't that scientific - it
> uses data from the past to try to predict the future
> (nobody belittles the weatherman though and people
> still watch it). Study Gann's books and other papers
> and learn from nature.
>
> Scott Harper
>
>
> --- leepaige2001 <leepaige2001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Peter,Nroman,and Other GG Members,
> >
> > We don't need another SPAMMER debate.I think that
> > Jason and Randy----
> > covered that about 10 days.Norman,yes you are good
> > at Astrology,but
> > we need more results.Peter raises some good concerns
> > about this
> > issue.A suggestion for all,Why doesn't Norman answer
> > those 10
> > questions put forth from Randy?Yes they were tough
> > questions,but I
> > think they were done with the GG Groups best
> > interests in mind.I
> > think VZ has erased those "helphr-posts",but maybe
> > someone else in
> > here has them,and they could forward them to the
> > group,with VZ's
> > permission.Norman,This is not a personal attack at
> > you or your Astro
> > methods,but many of us in here just need some
> > answers that raised our
> > doubts about you,being you didn't debate what was
> > said.Peter also has
> > some very good questions as well.After all,Gann was
> > more than
> > just "Astrology".He used many methods,which included
> > Astrology.I
> > don't think we need to debate,"Which came first Gann
> > theory",Gann
> > Astrology,or Gann Technicals.After all,does it
> > really matter?Don't
> > they both work?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Lee Paige
> >
> >
> > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, "Norman Winski"
> > <nwinski@xxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Peter Andrews
> > > To: gannsghost@xxxx
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:51 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [gannsghost] Re: Studying Gann
> > >
> > >
> > > Norman
> > >
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > > Sorry, I won't let you take shots at me and
> > then say, but
> > let's move on. In your most recent note, your lack
> > of substantiation
> > was conspicuous by its absence. Now you have "moved
> > on" by making
> > more unsubstantiated attacks on me. I have had
> > nothing to do with
> > people being removed from this list. They did that
> > on their own. No
> > one left because of anything I said about them,
> > because I don't hurl
> > personal insults. However, I am not afraid to debate
> > the issues at
> > hand. Some people take it personally when they find
> > themselves on the
> > short end of a debate, due to a lack of
> > substantiation or proof. It
> > is easy to make cheap accusations about people you
> > don't know. It is
> > much harder to back those accusations with proof.
> > It would be
> > refreshing if rather than resorting to personal
> > attacks on me, you
> > made at least a feeble attempt to defend the Gann or
> > market related
> > positions you took on your earlier posts. I take it
> > as an act of
> > surrender when you "move on" without any defense of
> > your positions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Norman
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There are many previous posts about your
> > 'success' as a trader,
> > your spamming and your constant belittling of
> > others.
> > >
> > > I have no intention of going over that again.
> > Many good people
> > have left this site and that is very sad.
> > >
> > > If you are so despirate for money, sell your
> > courses to innocent
> > novices who know no better - but let this site get
> > back to discussing
> > Gann and trading.
> > >
> > > I earn a living from trading with Gann
> > techniques and I do not
> > need to sell anything to anyone.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > Norman Winski <nwinski@xxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Forget astrology. If astrology were the
> > answer all of
> > Gann's charts would be covered in it and Norman
> > Winski would use it
> > for trading instead of spamming this group in a
> > despirate attempt to
> > sell his course to people who do not (yet) know any
> > better.
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > > How much Astrology have you studied? What
> > makes you think I
> > am spamming and not sincerely trying to help
> > someone? What makes you
> > think that I don't use Astrology for trading? If you
> > had read my
> > posts in the past year, you would know that I have
> > posted many
> > profitable recommendations worth tens of thousands
> > of dollars, just
> > in the past year, of which I executed all of those
> > trades for my own
> > account. How many of those recomendations did you
> > check out or
> > follow? Peter, I am willing to bet my ephemeris
> > that you know very
> > little if any Astrology. To paraphrase Sir Issac
> > Newton, I have
> > studied it sir, you have not.
> > >
> > > By the way, I wonder what one is suposed
> > to do when
> > reading Gann and Gann suggests such methods as
> > getting the
> > incorporation date and time for a company without
> > some knowledge of
> > Astrology? Should those who follow your Gann path
> > just ignore about
> > 50% of what Gann writes and chock it up to some
> > possible future
> > epiphany? Peter, please tell us your qualifications
> > for advising on
> > learning Gann? How many years have you studied? How
> > much Astrology
> > have you studied and why don't you think it adds to
> > learning Gann?
> > >
> > > As for my spamming, there is no reason
> > anyone can't go get
> > Astrology information from thousands of other
> > sources other than
> > me. I didn't advise that anyone had to study with
> > me in order to
> > learn Gann. I merely advise they should learn
> > Astrology in the same
> > way someone should learn math if they want to
> > understand physics.
> > >
> > > Peter, I eagerly await to be enlightened
> > by your answers to
> > the above questions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Norman
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > three6phi <rikim@xxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Linda,
> > >
> > > I can only suggest you either purchase
> > Gann's Commodity and
> > or Stock
> > > Market course(s); his books are an
> > absolute must. Whilst a
> > little
> > > difficult to follow most the time, there
> > is
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> http://news.yahoo.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> gannsghost-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Home Selling? Try Us!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/QrPZMC/iTmEAA/MVfIAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|