[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Fortune.com Retirement Guide 2002 Stocks vs. Bonds



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

The opposing point of view by Bill Miller. Please scroll all the way 
down.

John


Fortune.com: Retirement Guide 2002: Stocks vs. Bonds
        
     
       
     
                  
     
                        SEARCH FORTUNE 
                           
                       
                        GET QUOTE 
                          
                       
                 
                 
                        Fortune 500 
                       
                        Global 500 
                       
                        100 Best to Work For 
                       
                        America's Most Admired 
                       
                        Global Most Admired 
                       
                        100 Fastest Growing 
                       
                        Small Business 100 
                       
                        50 Best for Minorities 
                       
                        Washington Power 25 
                       
                        CEOs 
                       
                        All Fortune Lists 
                       
                        Download the 500  
                 

                 

                        Click here to subscribe to Fortune.
                        Provide banner and clickthrough for non-JS 
people. 
                 
                 
                        Fortune Datastore 
                        Magazine Customer Service 
                        · Renew 
                        · Change address 
                        Fortune Conferences 
                        Special Sections 
                        Magazine Advertisers 

                       
                 
                 
                        Current Issue 
                        Archive 
                        Site Map 
                        Frequently Asked Questions 
                        Press Center 
                        Contact Fortune 
                        Advertising Information 

                       
                 
           
      RETIREMENT GUIDE 2002  
           
                         
                        Bill Miller
                        (Photo: Evan Kafka) 
                        STOCKS OR BONDS
                        · Bill Miller: Sultan of Stock
                        · Bill Gross: Bond King
                             
                                Protect Your Dreams
                                Best-Laid Plans
                                FORTUNE 40
                                Stocks vs. Bonds
                                Real Estate: Invest Where You Sleep?
                                Pension Funds' Seamy Side
                                Retirement Guide
                                 
                             

                       
                  Stocks or Bonds? Bill vs. Bill
                  Can bonds beat stocks for a third year in a row? 
Two legendary fund managers offer answers--and surprising views on 
the state of the markets. 
                  FORTUNE
                  Monday, August 12, 2002
                  By David Rynecki 

                  Bill Miller: The Sultan of Stock
                  Miller, who oversees Legg Mason Value Trust fund, 
is the only manager to have beaten the S&P 500 for 11 years in a row.

                  FORTUNE: Is the selloff almost over? 
                  MILLER: Look, you can never call a bottom. We began 
buying some of the telecom equipment names in spring and summer of 
2001 because we thought more than a year into the decline a lot of 
those stocks were within maybe three to six months of bottoming. We 
were early. It was a mistake. But there are a whole host of things 
going on now that tell me that the market is in a bottoming process. 
Take the duration of the decline--22 months. That's equal to the '73-
'74 decline. Go back to the Great Depression, and that market was 30 
months from the peak in 1929 to the bottom. What we're seeing is 
something the vast majority of people haven't seen before because 
this is a once-in-a-generation--or once- or twice-in-a-century--type 
of event. What's good is that the levels of pessimism reflected in a 
lot of the technical indices, the outflow of mutual funds, the 
declining retail participation, the significant decline in 
speculative activity, the drying up of the new issue calendar--these 
all indicate a bottoming process.

                  FORTUNE: So is this a golden opportunity? 
                  MILLER: Not really. If the market's valuations were 
seven or eight times earnings, or even ten times earnings [the S&P 
500 is trading at an average 2002 price/earnings ratio of about 22], 
I'd say it was a golden opportunity. There is an opportunity to do 
quite well, but overall market valuations are not compelling. Even if 
we are right that the equity market is attractive right here, that 
doesn't mean that the difficulties that led to this situation have 
disappeared and that we'll have 15% returns. We're in the camp of 6% 
to 8% annual returns--not thrilling, but wonderful compared with 
losing money.

                  FORTUNE: Then what will it take to beat the S&P 
500? 
                  MILLER: The key is avoiding the areas that have 
been terrible. Most stocks, something like 60%, are outperforming the 
market. Sometimes the market is a democracy, meaning everything goes 
up. Sometimes it's a meritocracy, and few things go up. In all 
markets I look for very high rates of return over my forecast time 
horizon. A stock may be performing very poorly in this environment 
and still be a great investment over a number of years. We want to 
know how stock prices depart from underlying value and why. That can 
be on the upside as we saw with the Internet, when most companies 
weren't worth anything like the market thought they were worth. What 
we want is the reverse--tremendous pessimism, people believing that a 
business is broken, scandal, something everybody is fleeing from--in 
short, what we're seeing today. That has pointed us to business 
models that are in the process of changing and that people don't 
fully understand, like Barry Diller's USA Interactive, or companies 
that are right in the cross hairs of what everyone is most afraid of, 
like Tyco.

                  FORTUNE: Tyco? Why would you go near something that 
radioactive? 
                  MILLER: What's so radioactive about Tyco? We own a 
lot of it. We bought it in the first quarter, which was obviously 
early, but have been buying 500,000 shares a day for quite some time. 
Tyco's problems, so far, are not Tyco's problems. They are [ex-CEO] 
Dennis Kozlowski's personal problems. There is no ongoing SEC 
investigation of Tyco's accounting--not yet, at least. The SEC 
conducted such an investigation in 1999 and found there wasn't any 
issue with Tyco's acquisition accounting. What's scaring people right 
now is that they look at what WorldCom did and wonder if Tyco didn't 
do the same. We are not in that camp. As we go through the company, 
our central valuation is about $30, twice where it's trading. With a 
better environment, we could see it go to the mid-40s. We think 
there's a big margin for safety in the stock.

                  FORTUNE: You've been particularly vocal about stock 
options. 
                  MILLER: Yes. The promiscuous issuance of options 
creates a serious problem for the equity investor because the equity 
investor is suffering substantial yearly dilution of his future 
returns as a portion of those returns are transferred to management 
and employees. In that environment bonds have the great advantage 
that management cannot take those returns away, whereas the equity 
investor has been a full participant on the downside but only a 
partial participant on the upside.

                  FORTUNE: What's to be done? 
                  MILLER: If stock options cannot be honestly 
accounted for, then they should be eliminated. Companies that lobby 
to keep the estimated expense of stock options off the income 
statement are advertising their intent to deceive and contributing to-
-almost causing--the crisis of confidence. We're systematically 
paring down or eliminating positions in the portfolio where we have 
evidence that the management manipulates the stock option program to 
their advantage or ignores shareholders' majority votes on 
resolutions. We're really raising the threshold for managements. Now, 
if I'm so interested in corporate governance then why am I buying 
Tyco? Tyco is going to get a lot better corporate governance than it 
has had, and so are a lot of other companies. If we believe there is 
going to be better responsiveness to shareholders, that is a big plus.

                  FORTUNE: Other than Tyco and USA, where do you see 
opportunities? 
                  MILLER: We've ramped up some of the more 
speculative names like Nextel and AES. I also think some of the 
financials are well positioned: Fannie Mae in the low 70s, Citigroup 
below $40. [Mortgage insurer] MGIC is another value. Here's a company 
that earns 25% on equity every year and has grown its earnings every 
year for ten years at 15%, has a sterling balance sheet, is 
overcapitalized, and trades at nine times earnings. For people with 
an appetite for scarier things, Lucent and Qwest are attractive.

                  FORTUNE: You've said the guy with the lowest 
average cost wins. How so? 
                  MILLER: A lot of people will pay $30 for a stock, 
and it goes to $20 and they wait for the stock to act better before 
they buy more. But if it goes from $20 to $30 and you doubled the 
position at $20, now your average cost is $25. If you wait you gain 
nothing. We would prefer to buy stocks at the exact low, but as 
Bernard Baruch said, "Nobody buys at the low or sells at the high 
except liars." We know that when we buy them they're going lower, and 
we should be willing to continue buying.

                  FORTUNE: So what's the bottom line? 
                  MILLER: The second half of the year is going to be 
much better than the first.

                  FORTUNE: Will bonds beat stocks again this year? 
                  MILLER: At the beginning of the year, I thought 
stocks would outperform bonds. I've been wrong, since bonds are about 
2,500 basis points ahead of the S&P 500. Given the wide gap, I 
believe bonds will outperform stocks this year. Looking out three to 
five years, I think stocks will outperform bonds from here.

                  Or will bonds beat stocks? See Bill Gross: The Bond 
King. 
                 
             
           
     
     

            
     


     
      ©Copyright 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in 
whole or in part without permission is prohibited. 
      Privacy Policy Terms of Use Disclaimer Contact Fortune 
      Copyright © 1995-2001 Stockpoint its data suppliers. All rights 
reserved. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ and 20 
minutes for other exchanges. Quote data provided by S&P Comstock. 
Please read our Terms and Conditions. 




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/