|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yep, well August is a tough month to try to do anything let alone predict,
guess, even follow anything from my experience, something to do with the
Hamptons, last days of summer, kids off to schoole etc, we should all be on
vacation like them :-)?
don ewers
----- Original Message -----
From: "tradewynne" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Elliott wave count
> Um, gulp, now I'm scared: we seem to agree.
>
> > What do you think is coming up BW, any thoughts?
>
> I really don't know, but it'd be cool if it replayed the
> 70's a bit. In particular that DJI 7480 (38.2%) retracement
> from the 1974 low. Then the DJI would have paid it's
> respects to both '82 and '74 and could go off and churn
> the bulls and burn the bears with big trading ranges like it did
> in the 70's.... Probably just whistful thinking: the 70's
> and 80's were fun times for me, I'd like to do it all
> again.
>
> For now my system is short and my count points down,
> but the system could flip manana. We'll see.
>
> BW
>
>
>
> --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxx> wrote:
> > BW,
> > Ahh I see, I probably did not phase that very well. The comment
> about the
> > bears is not a ST one (1-5 day correction), infact we will likely
> correct
> > the rally up. I am speaking a little longer term than a ST
> correction,
> > should it come in here, which very well could be profitable for a
> bear. My
> > comment would be more directed towards late September. As I have
> said I am
> > seeing some warnings that once any correction is over, we may take
> out the
> > rally highs in a larger wave c:4 on the daily (a correction here
> being B:4
> > on the daily). Maybe not, but the warnings are there
> irregardless. In
> > otherwords a possible bigger ABC, the abc on the 60min being wave
> A:4? My
> > targets for this rally was 968 to 974 and we fell slightly short.
> >
> > What do you think is coming up BW, any thoughts?
> > don ewers
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "tradewynne" <tradewynne@xxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 3:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Elliott wave count
> >
> >
> > > > DE: Look at the very right side of the 60min chart I sent (in
> red,
> > > swing target) :-)
> > >
> > > Of course, and yet with a direct hit on *your* AGET's simple as
> ABC
> > > target you say:
> > >
> > >
> > > >....might be "up".....
> > > > > > > Careful bears
> > > > > > > > for the moment?
> > > > > > > > don ewers
> > >
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > This is my whole point and question: why ignore what your own
> > > software seems to be saying loud and clear? I've looked at the
> > > charts you posted and done the same calcs myself (I posted "960+"
> > > here a week ago). Your software seems to be calling for a
> potential
> > > 200+/- point decline right from Thursday's high yet you seem to be
> > > bullish cause of the PTI?
> > >
> > > BW
> > >
> > > PS: The thing that concerns me with this PTI stuff is that
> > > bear market rallies tend to be very sharp. If the PTI is
> > > a momentum based indicator, and someone claims it's right
> > > 94% of the time, but most of their tests were done in post 1993
> > > bull markets.... what can I say: it makes me wonder.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > BW,
> > > > You asked "OK, so you are saying it's a momentum indicator that
> > > predicts
> > > > what the MACD will do?"
> > > >
> > > > DE: Not sure if I could say yes or no to that, I do not know the
> > > algorithm?
> > > > I view it mainly as a tool that tells me when I should be
> > > questioning what
> > > > are the other possibilities here, since something is not quite
> > > right with
> > > > this pattern. At that point would normally trade my trading
> > > position from
> > > > one with a good setup to one with a questionable setup (ala a
> wave
> > > 4 sell
> > > > here thinking a new wave 5 low will come in from here). It's a
> > > warning sign
> > > > to not just jump on a type #1 trade which is after a wave 4 to
> > > capture wave
> > > > 5.
> > > >
> > > > BW: You asked " Most of the "testing" has been done in Bull
> market
> > > > conditions? Has it been tested on 1930's, 1966-1982, or recent
> > > Nikkei data?
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > DE: I don't know the answer about how far they went back His
> email
> > > (Tom
> > > > Joseph) is gettrader@xxxx I believe. You could email him and
> ask for
> > > > specifics I suppose, he would know if anyone?
> > > >
> > > > BW: You asked "Contrary to what" Recall you had asked in the
> prior
> > > email
> > > > "Why / when would you ignore *your* clearly very bearish EW
> count
> > > based on
> > > > the PTI?"
> > > >
> > > > DE: My answer was in my prior email that the low PTI is saying
> > > something may
> > > > be wrong, that the wave 4 may not be a normal wave 4, and as
> such
> > > prices can
> > > > go higher than what a wave 4 normally does overall?
> > > >
> > > > BW: You asked "So many EWers on the list, yet not one mentioned
> SPX
> > > 966 is a
> > > > perfect A=C"
> > > >
> > > > DE: Look at the very right side of the 60min chart I sent (in
> red,
> > > swing
> > > > target) :-)
> > > > don ewers
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "tradewynne" <tradewynne@xxxx>
> > > > To: <realtraders@xxxx>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 12:44 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [RT] Elliott wave count
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > 94% of all wave 4's will pull back to zero (or within 10%
> of the
> > > > > > wave 3's 3/35 oscillator height). If the wave
> > > > > > 4's 5/35 oscillator drops below 1.4 of the height,
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, so you are saying it's a momentum indicator that predicts
> > > > > what the MACD will do?
> > > > >
> > > > > > It has been thoroughly tested by AGET (they have had the
> > > indicator
> > > > > since 1993 at least)
> > > > >
> > > > > Most of the "testing" has been done in Bull market
> conditions? Has
> > > > > it been tested on 1930's, 1966-1982, or recent Nikkei data?
> > > > >
> > > > > Are the "tests" done on the original wave 4 counts or the
> after
> > > the
> > > > > fact changed wave 4 counts? IOW, do they only count the data
> after
> > > > > they've turned out to be right?
> > > > >
> > > > > > Quite the contrary, a low PTI (below 35) is an indication
> the
> > > any
> > > > > wave 5 will be a double bottom (or top)..
> > > > >
> > > > > Contrary to what?
> > > > >
> > > > > Once again, based on the DJI, a very moderate new low would
> > > approach
> > > > > 38.2% from 1974 near 7480. Also, the recent DJI low is near
> the
> > > 38.2%
> > > > > retrace off the 1982 low (7555). In the fall of 1974 the SPX
> rally
> > > > > was just about the same percentage rally off the lows as the
> SPX
> > > > > peak last week. So many EWers on the list, yet not one
> mentioned
> > > > > SPX 966 is a perfect A=C. FWIW, the SPX did NOT make a new low
> > > with
> > > > > the DJI in the fall of 1974. That would seem to agree with
> > > AGET "PTI"
> > > > > call for a failed fifth.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > BW
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > BW,
> > > > > > Quite the contrary, a low PTI (below 35) is an indication
> the
> > > any
> > > > > wave 5
> > > > > > will be a double bottom (or top) at the worst and a failed
> 5th
> > > wave
> > > > > at the
> > > > > > best (meaning the wave 5 never occurs). In the case since
> the
> > > wave
> > > > > 3 was
> > > > > > down and the wave 4 was up, so it is currently saying any
> wave 5
> > > > > down,
> > > > > > should it materialize, will "currently" not project wave 5
> > > making a
> > > > > new low
> > > > > > (in this 5 wave pattern) and may just keep rallying up
> > > utimately.
> > > > > So not
> > > > > > bearish, actually bullish.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The PTI (Profit Taking Index) is a proprietary indicator
> that
> > > aids
> > > > > in
> > > > > > determining the probability of a wave 5, by measuring the
> wave
> > > 4
> > > > > correction
> > > > > > (it compares the Buying/Selling momentum in Wave 3 with the
> > > > > Buying/Selling
> > > > > > momentum in Wave 4). Basically it is an algorithm that "in
> a
> > > > > number"
> > > > > > measures whether the wave 4 normal in price and time in
> > > relation to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > previous wave 3. If it is not normal, one needs to be
> > > suspicious
> > > > > of what is
> > > > > > mentioned above (double bottom or top or a failed 5th
> wave), as
> > > > > well as a
> > > > > > possible wave count change (the 1-2-3 becomes A-B-C) and a
> new
> > > 1-2-
> > > > > 3 starts
> > > > > > from the previous end of wave 3).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It has been thoroughly tested by AGET (they have had the
> > > indicator
> > > > > since
> > > > > > 1993 at least) and I have found it to be one of the best
> tools
> > > in
> > > > > analyzing
> > > > > > any 300 bar count and measing a wave 4 to determine the
> > > probability
> > > > > of a
> > > > > > wave 5. If you think of any move as a three wave affair
> (ignore
> > > > > the smaller
> > > > > > wave 1 and wave 2, just think of it as two thrusts in one
> > > > > direction, with a
> > > > > > correction in between. The only statistic I havewhich was
> from
> > > > > 1993 said 21
> > > > > > to 26% of the time the 2nd thrust fails to take out the
> high (or
> > > > > low) of the
> > > > > > first thrust. The PTI is a tool that warns you that you
> may be
> > > in
> > > > > one of
> > > > > > those instances. The other stat I have is 94% of all wave
> 4's
> > > will
> > > > > pull back
> > > > > > to zero (or within 10% of the wave 3's 3/35 oscillator
> > > height). If
> > > > > the wave
> > > > > > 4's 5/35 oscillator drops below 1.4 of the height, this
> will
> > > also
> > > > > send the
> > > > > > PTI lower.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Attached are the 60min (measuring count from 5-17-02 which
> is
> > > only
> > > > > wave 3 on
> > > > > > the daily) and daily charts (measuring the count from 3-19-
> 02
> > > high)
> > > > > and a
> > > > > > weekly. Both are saying the same thing with the low
> PTI's. On
> > > the
> > > > > 60min
> > > > > > (in long term count) the rally also past the red wave 4
> > > channels,
> > > > > another
> > > > > > warning this it is not a normal wave 4. Note the 5/35 and
> 10/70
> > > > > oscillators
> > > > > > (long term count) have both gone past the 1.40, saying they
> > > > > have "lost
> > > > > > control". We may correct this rally up, however AGET is
> giving
> > > > > hint's it
> > > > > > may have futher to go ultimately?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No PTI on a weekly since it is showing 5 waves in (PTI only
> > > appear
> > > > > between a
> > > > > > wave 3 and a wave 4). There is some question on the count
> there
> > > > > because the
> > > > > > wave 5's 5/35 oscillator is "bigger" than the wave 3's.
> This
> > > could
> > > > > mean the
> > > > > > count could expand again (wave 5 becomes wave 3 and we are
> in
> > > wave
> > > > > 4 now)?
> > > > > > If that count change occurs a PTI would appear, so jury out
> > > there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hope this helps and sorry about the long explanation.
> > > > > > don ewers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "tradewynne" <tradewynne@xxxx>
> > > > > > To: <realtraders@xxxx>
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 12:36 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [RT] Elliott wave count
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >My PTI cash is also saying this is not a normal wave 4
> with
> > > a PTI
> > > > > > > >below 34 of 26? Careful bears for the moment?
> > > > > > > > don ewers
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is the PTI an indicator? What's its basis? Anyone coded
> > > > > > > and tested it? What's the current weekly and hourly "PTI"?
> > > > > > > Are they bullish too? Why / when would you ignore *your*
> > > > > > > clearly very bearish EW count based on the PTI?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BW
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PS: You bulls be careful too now....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Don Ewers" <dbewers@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Tend to agree Earl, something else might be "up". My
> PTI
> > > cash
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > saying this is not a normal wave 4 with a PTI below 34
> of
> > > 26?
> > > > > > > Careful bears
> > > > > > > > for the moment?
> > > > > > > > don ewers
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxx>
> > > > > > > > To: <realtraders@xxxx>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:00 AM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [RT] Elliott wave count
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Advanced Get EOD, September EMini, Daily chart in
> regular
> > > > > count
> > > > > > > (close to
> > > > > > > > > shifting to long count) shows closing PTI for
> Wednesday
> > > at 26.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earl
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: "rashid subtain" <vze24c5m@xxxx>
> > > > > > > > > To: <realtraders@xxxx>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 11:13 AM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [RT] Elliott wave count
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Earl,
> > > > > > > > > My PTI count shows 66.what software are u using.Thanks
> > > for the
> > > > > > > info
> > >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/02
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/mG3HAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|