|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Rhonda,
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
I think his question of
is "where is the Moderator"
was an appropriate
request.
I'm being objective<FONT face=Arial
size=2>.
Adrian
posted his "opinion" based
on his experience but
no research or facts
to back that experience
up of what he "thought"
the research "should"
show in past bear markets. <SPAN
class=095511001-28072002><FONT
color=#0000ff>
<SPAN
class=095511001-28072002>
<FONT
color=#0000ff>Your exactly right. It was my opinion that I
expressed. I never professed to having
done
<FONT
color=#0000ff>the research, that I why I asked Clyde who had it all at his
fingertips to cover the relevant
<FONT
color=#0000ff>time frames to see what we could all learn.
Clyde posted research of
data and then later
posted reseach of the
period Adrian requested. <SPAN
class=095511001-28072002><FONT
color=#0000ff>
<SPAN
class=095511001-28072002>
<FONT
color=#0000ff>He did,,,and I commented on
it.
Adrian did not like those facts
but didn't provide any kind
of research
whatsoever to disprove them.
Just
lashed out in a very
harsh manner because
it didn't agree with
what the research "should"
show according to his
perception based only
on experience; no
research.
My last post on this subject.
Rhonda <SPAN
class=095511001-28072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
I'm
not sure where you derive this conclusion Rhonda...its clearly something you
made up in your own mind, as it certainly bears no relevancy to the facts that
have appeared in my posts where I commented on Clyde's chart showing the
1929-33 time frame. Like most people..you clearly missed my point as
well. I wasn't trying
to disprove Clyde as you so put it. Far from it. I was trying to
point out that if he wished to appreciate the importance of 6% updays he
needed to compare like with like. Bear trends with bear trends.
nothing complicated. Its something most analysts would do with only a
modicum of market understanding. Most people seem incapable of seeing
past one dimensional analysis. All I am trying to do is opens peoples
minds to a greater understanding of how markets work. They are complex
and chaotic...NOT one dimensional. Thats why virtually all indicators will
lose you money if used on their own. People can either learn or
not. I can take the horse to the water, but if they wish to be arrogant
and not drink because they preferred some other pond..then so be it...its not
my concern.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Adrian
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>PS. Rhonda,you need to think very clear about your statement
"it didn't agree with <FONT face=Arial
size=2>what the research "should" show
according to his perception based only
on experience; no <FONT face=Arial
size=2>research. " If you feel that research, which shows something is
or isn't true is more important than a person with 'experience'..extensive
mind you..full time for the past 20 years then you need to be extremely
careful or you will lose a lot of money. If an academic told you the
markets weren't tradeable, but someone like Richard Dennis or Monroe Trout
told you they were and they had 20 years of profits to prove it...who would
you believe??????????????
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Click here to find your contact lenses!
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|